If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VTL vs. Backup to Disk
I'm trying to figure out the pros and cons for backing up to a disk
device vs. using a virtual tape library like the Clariion Disk Library. You're backing up to disk on both of them, presumably at the same speeds but it seems that the VTL adds a level of complexity and cost. Does anyone have any experience or opinions of either two? Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Jul 2005 07:01:38 -0700, "
wrote: I'm trying to figure out the pros and cons for backing up to a disk device vs. using a virtual tape library like the Clariion Disk Library. You're backing up to disk on both of them, presumably at the same speeds but it seems that the VTL adds a level of complexity and cost. Does anyone have any experience or opinions of either two? Brian In theory the VTL will be faster. True, both are disk based but there are optimizations on the raw device and firmware/software for VTL's. Whether or not you would actually see a performance difference is questionable, but that's the theory. ~F |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Faeandar writes:
Whether or not you would actually see a performance difference is questionable, but that's the theory. To the OP, Perhaps you can see if you can get a loaner unit for a couple of weeks and run some benchmarks / tests? Please let us know what you decide, and the reasons. -- David Magda dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What backup software are you using? It really depends on that and how
it supports disk versus a library. Most solutions support libraries allot better then disk. So the VTL will offer more functionality then the disk solution. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'm using both Legato NetWorker and Veritas NetBackup in different
environments. I should expect that there wouldn't be much of a difference in performance between the two. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I would say use a VTL solution. This way it can be shared between the
two applications. The CDL soltuion from EMC is really using falcon store software. It works well and will allow Net Backup and Networker to use the same space. If you go with disk you are limited to one host owning the lun and only that host can dump data on it. The VTL will make it allot easier to manage. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What other considerations might there be. The two environments I'm
speaking of would have their own dedicated disk/VTL and sharing wouldn't be a issue. What about cost, performance or functionality? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On 14 Jul 2005 07:01:38 -0700, "
wrote: I'm trying to figure out the pros and cons for backing up to a disk device vs. using a virtual tape library like the Clariion Disk Library. You're backing up to disk on both of them, presumably at the same speeds but it seems that the VTL adds a level of complexity and cost. Does anyone have any experience or opinions of either two? Brian Something to consider.... http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/...&ad=523069USCA ~F |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Backup to disk and then what? Offload to Tape?
Look our solution for Windows server backup from http://www.datamills.com I cut and paste a testimonial. "Having been let down by our old tape-based backup system once to many times I searched the internet high and low for an alternative solution. I knew that the logical route would be a disk-to-disk backup between the server and a remote machine, but I was concerned that transferring so much data across the network would cause a significant drop in performance. Over the period of several months I downloaded and tested dozens and dozens of different backup systems, but none of them really did what I wanted; store multiple versions of the data from days, weeks & months ago without needing to multiply the disk space (and cost) it required! I was almost ready to give up when I stumbled across DataMills Relative Rev Backup. At last I had found an application that would store incremental backups as if they were full backups... what they are in fact is virtual backups! Genius! I now backup all my data in less than 6 minutes, and can restore any version of any file from an archive of backups that goes back months. It is so easy and so reliable I can forget about it and get on with more important things. Thanks DataMills!" -- David Hasell, Croydon, UK wrote in message oups.com... I'm trying to figure out the pros and cons for backing up to a disk device vs. using a virtual tape library like the Clariion Disk Library. You're backing up to disk on both of them, presumably at the same speeds but it seems that the VTL adds a level of complexity and cost. Does anyone have any experience or opinions of either two? Brian |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Brian,
Here is some stuff I did when I was an analyst w/ ESG. It talks a little bit about the difference. Also, it may add a little on the cost, but on the complexity side, after setup (configuring the thing to look like the tape library you want) it is very simple to deploy, manage and recover. The cost may be up there w/ things from EMC or NTAP but there are some good prodcuts available from a number of different vendors that are less. here are some of my writings Does Disk Solve The Problem? Based on our last comments about integrated disk and tape solutions, and all the hype disk based backup solutions are getting these days, lets take a closer look at how disk based solutions are helping the data protection paradigm evolve. There has been a lot of talk concerning how the backup paradigm will change toward disk-based solutions. The latest and most common discussion is about how disk-based technologies will be used to increase data recovery. As ATA arrays are becoming more mainstream and commoditized, the cost per MB of low-end disk arrays are beginning to converge with tape costs. As this convergence happens, IT managers are starting to discuss the cost-related pros and cons of managing their existing backup processes versus the ease of data management and higher availability that disk-based backup solutions provide. Again, most of these discussions revolve around disk and disk-based appliances. Traditional Backup/Recovery Technologies - Most of the traditional software backup vendors (BakBone, CA, CommVault, HP, Legato, SyncSort, Tivoli, and Veritas) have stated that they do or will support backup to disk. This means that IT can now purchase one of the many new ATA arrays to be used for caching their tape libraries. Moving data to disk with a traditional backup product is still backup in its purest form. The faster speed of disk has helped with shrinking backup windows, but only slightly. To the credit of the traditional backup vendors is that they are continuing to innovate. Companies such as Veritas are adding the capability to do synthetic full backups. This helps alleviate the need for full backups. BakBone continues to innovate as it pertains to networked storage backup, also a good platform for increasing backup performance. Data growth is still outpacing this backup window, which leads us back to the theme of this brief, which is, "How will data protection evolve to meet these challenges?" Virtual Tape Libraries (VTL) - Over the past 18 months, we have seen more and more intelligence move from the backup software into either the fabric or the arrays being used for backup/recovery. Recently, there has been a spate of VTL announcements. VTL software is designed to make a disk array look like a tape library. Vendors who deliver such technology include Alacritus, Diligent, Falconstor, IBM, Quantum, Sepaton, and even BakBone (which has designed VTL capabilities into its software). Some of these companies deliver software while others deliver appliances with software built in, such as the Quantum DX30. The goal with VTL is to get IT past the psychological inertia associated with migrating from disk- to tape-based backup. VTLs fit seamlessly into the existing backup environment and require very little or no change to the existing processes. The only change in the backup process is for IT to redirect the backup application to the IP address of the array instead of the tape library, and backups should be ready to run. The data written to disk is exactly what you would expect to see on tape, and can be easily cloned or moved quickly to tape without affecting media management schemas - which is crucial when it comes to recovery. Disk Backup/Recovery Targets - As we move along the data protection continuum, there are a couple of diverging schools of thought on disk-based backup and recovery. In the first camp is the group of people who believe in disk-based backup as cache and don't understand the need to put the data on disk in a format that is like tape. Their view is, "What is the point? VTL software costs more money and at the end of the day, IT must have a process of moving the same volume of data off to tape for archival." However, depending on the backup software, cloning data to tape may not be possible when VTL is not used. For example, data written to a 120GB disk drive with backup software cannot be cloned to 60GB tapes. Trying it could also cause an issue with the media management schemas. This is where the conflict between existing processes and new processes comes into play. While some IT folks attempt to mirror existing processes, others only care that their primary storage is always available, and they don't care that it may take all day to move backups from the ATA array to tape. That said, most disk vendors' products can act as a target for backup, these vendors include Iomega, Network Appliance, NexSAN, and Snap as well as many others. The other disk-based school of thought deals with recovery. This is not to say that by putting data on disk, you don't increase recovery speed, it does, but IT still needs to use the processes defined by traditional backup software to recover data. Even though recovery focused technologies may not meet all backup requirements, they can help companies move up the data protection index by promising faster backup and more importantly, a greater chance of data recovery. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Partition Utility | Bob | General | 49 | May 30th 05 10:50 PM |
P4S333 hard drive capacity | Katy | Asus Motherboards | 6 | September 19th 04 04:26 AM |
Disk to Disk Backup recommendations requested | Michelle | Storage (alternative) | 12 | September 9th 04 04:15 PM |
Backup software for a home network? | Ken K | Storage (alternative) | 25 | June 11th 04 01:31 AM |
Problem booting from SATA disk with GA-8KNXP motherboard (like many others) | Eric Janvier | Gigabyte Motherboards | 9 | November 22nd 03 01:56 AM |