If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk,
else it would not be worth their effort to do this. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
Hi!
Win & render another group unusable It has become *very* annoying, but I'm not giving up on this group just yet. Last night I built a fairly elaborate rule in Outlook Express to get most of it, and it really helped quite a bit. This took a lot of thinking, as I wanted to strike a balance between getting most of the garbage and not deleting wanted posts that happen to contain certain words in the subject. So far it seems like the source is abuse of Google Groups. But I'm just not willing to block GG postings for a multitude of reasons. (Yes, I have news access outside of GG. It is, however, not the best.) ....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. The reason they do it is not so much because it is successful, but because it is very, very cheap to do this. I'm sure they get some responses, but I doubt they are the main reason for this. William |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
Don't assume that there is even junk to buy. The spammers could be scammers who
take your money and provide nothing in return. Great profit margins on that sort of business. Their web site, in pidgin English with many HTML formatting errors advertises every fake watch possible. Well, maybe not. No fake Timex. Why would anyone trust a seller of avowedly fake goods? In the words of Barnum, there's a sucker born every minute... Ben Myers On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:07:22 -0700, "Justbob30" wrote: Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:55:20 -0400, Ben Myers
wrote: Don't assume that there is even junk to buy. The spammers could be scammers who take your money and provide nothing in return. Great profit margins on that sort of business. Their web site, in pidgin English with many HTML formatting errors advertises every fake watch possible. Well, maybe not. No fake Timex. Why would anyone trust a seller of avowedly fake goods? In the words of Barnum, there's a sucker born every minute... Ben Myers And/or at the same time, harvest emails to sell or spam your email addresses too !! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:48:25 -0400, "Doug"
wrote: "Justbob30" wrote in message ... Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. Filter posts from Googlegroups and it's almost entirely eliminated. In fact scrolling back to December of last year I don't see one in alt.sys.pc-clone.dell. NFilter is my choice. http://www.nfilter.org/ Doug, this may be a trade off because if my memory is correct and feel free to correct if I'm wrong (I used nfilter a long time ago), you have to use a proxy to make it work with your newsreader and that slows things down a bit. No argument about nfilter as it's been around a long time and a proven filter and many like yourself swear by it. I just want to make others aware that they may have to sacrifice a bit of speed to use nfilter for spam filtering. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:13:30 -0500, RnR wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:48:25 -0400, "Doug" wrote: "Justbob30" wrote in message ... Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. Filter posts from Googlegroups and it's almost entirely eliminated. In fact scrolling back to December of last year I don't see one in alt.sys.pc-clone.dell. NFilter is my choice. http://www.nfilter.org/ Doug, this may be a trade off because if my memory is correct and feel free to correct if I'm wrong (I used nfilter a long time ago), you have to use a proxy to make it work with your newsreader and that slows things down a bit. No argument about nfilter as it's been around a long time and a proven filter and many like yourself swear by it. I just want to make others aware that they may have to sacrifice a bit of speed to use nfilter for spam filtering. Just to add to my post above, just in case I'm using the wrong terminology regarding a "proxy", what I had in mind is I recall you had to set your newreader to 127.0.0.1 or local host which slowed it down a bit. Nfilter did work tho as instructed. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
"Justbob30" wrote in message ... Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. Message rules. "Poof". These particular spammers aren't very creative (ie - sending multiple messages from the same created address(es) on a given day, and using a common word or words in the subject lines all of their spam posts). Today is the first day in a couple of weeks I've opened the groups to no SPAM messages. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:02:23 -0500, "S.Lewis"
wrote: "Justbob30" wrote in message ... Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. Message rules. "Poof". These particular spammers aren't very creative (ie - sending multiple messages from the same created address(es) on a given day, and using a common word or words in the subject lines all of their spam posts). Today is the first day in a couple of weeks I've opened the groups to no SPAM messages. Stew, don't tell them that. I know exactly what you mean and I've seen many that are nearly impossible to filter due to their uniqueness but I'm not going to educate them how to spam past most filters. If I did, I'd have to write better filters too and even then some would fly by my filters . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I guess the spammers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:07:22 -0700, "Justbob30"
wrote: Win & render another group unusable....I guess someone must buy this junk, else it would not be worth their effort to do this. Whether they will stay is uncertain. This group has been fortunate for so long that they haven't rendered it unusable, and the people here are creative so there would still be options but won't go into them unless it's necessary. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO SPAMMERS HERE! | Josh Mathews | Printers | 0 | September 6th 07 03:47 PM |
survey spammers...(OT) | nospam | Printers | 2 | October 14th 06 06:22 AM |
zebracomputers - spammers | peter | UK Computer Vendors | 1 | May 18th 06 07:35 AM |
CrazyPC = spammers? | Michael Brown | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | January 20th 05 07:51 AM |
I wish you Dam Spammers were really gone !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 | LoBo | Cdr | 0 | July 11th 03 12:58 PM |