If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:00:23 -0400, George Macdonald
wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:11:31 -0400, KR Williams wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:41:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Can we look for processors in designer colors next? Only in Macs... You've obviously not shopped for PCs recently. There are kits to put *windows* (how did M$ miss this?) in the sides of cases to see pretty blue lights on the (also optional) lights inside. If you think Apple has a corner on the nutzo's you're just not with it! Can we talk, err.. rice?... for a computer? I'm still waiting for someone to offer a *HUGE* exhaust tip that I can slap on to the back of my power supply fan and a giant airplane wing to give my case more downforce! : ------------- Tony Hill hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't that along the lines of what "Intel Inside" means?
Right now, "Intel Inside" refers to the CPU. Intel would just have to change that, to mean the CPU and the chipset too. If a PC builder isn't using an Intel chipset based MB, they would not be allowed to brand their box "Intel Inside". I would think that most people don't know that "Intel Inside" currently only means the CPU, and are already believing that a box branded as "Intel Inside" means EVERYTHING inside is from Intel. Intel would just have to make that true. Robert Myers wrote: The features in Grantsdale also could help persuade shoppers to seek out Intel-based computers, said Intel spokeswoman Laura Anderson. That may also steer shoppers away from PCs built with chips from rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc.. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Walt wrote:
Isn't that along the lines of what "Intel Inside" means? Right now, "Intel Inside" refers to the CPU. Intel would just have to change that, to mean the CPU and the chipset too. If a PC builder isn't using an Intel chipset based MB, they would not be allowed to brand their box "Intel Inside". I would think that most people don't know that "Intel Inside" currently only means the CPU, and are already believing that a box branded as "Intel Inside" means EVERYTHING inside is from Intel. Intel would just have to make that true. Do you really think Intel could get the chipset marketing campaign for free like that? For one thing, Intel tolerates licensed chipsets from other manufacturers. If it intends to continue tolerating them, then it needs to maintain reasonable relations with them, and suddenly declaring that the "Intel Inside" moniker would not apply to boxes with licensed non-Intel chipsets would be virtually a declaration of war on licensed chipsets for Intel cpu's--probably not the message Intel wants to send to anyone. RM |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 04:09:28 -0400, Tony Hill
wrote: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:00:23 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:11:31 -0400, KR Williams wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:41:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Can we look for processors in designer colors next? Only in Macs... You've obviously not shopped for PCs recently. There are kits to put *windows* (how did M$ miss this?) in the sides of cases to see pretty blue lights on the (also optional) lights inside. If you think Apple has a corner on the nutzo's you're just not with it! Can we talk, err.. rice?... for a computer? I'm still waiting for someone to offer a *HUGE* exhaust tip that I can slap on to the back of my power supply fan and a giant airplane wing to give my case more downforce! : Time to patent my electrostatic ionizing chimney which will work in conjunction with the hover lghts. Rgds, George Macdonald "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me?? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
In article i_Mvc.28059$_k3.702507@bgtnsc05-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net, lid says... In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips KR Williams wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:41:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Can we look for processors in designer colors next? Only in Macs... You've obviously not shopped for PCs recently. There are kits to put *windows* (how did M$ miss this?) in the sides of cases to see pretty blue lights on the (also optional) lights inside. If you think Apple has a corner on the nutzo's you're just not with it! And don't forget the glowing fans and cables! Reminds me of the tricked out cars & trucks with light cables. The fans were what I (ever so feebly) was talking about. $20 for a $2 fan? What's next noise-makers for computers so they sound "tough"? "tony" won't like thhhaaat! ;-) -- Keith |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 04:09:28 -0400, Tony Hill wrote: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:00:23 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:11:31 -0400, KR Williams wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:41:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Can we look for processors in designer colors next? Only in Macs... You've obviously not shopped for PCs recently. There are kits to put *windows* (how did M$ miss this?) in the sides of cases to see pretty blue lights on the (also optional) lights inside. If you think Apple has a corner on the nutzo's you're just not with it! Can we talk, err.. rice?... for a computer? I'm still waiting for someone to offer a *HUGE* exhaust tip that I can slap on to the back of my power supply fan and a giant airplane wing to give my case more downforce! : Time to patent my electrostatic ionizing chimney which will work in conjunction with the hover lghts. You forgot the "high efficiency" peltier coolers. -- Keith |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
In article S41wc.50391$Ly.31838@attbi_s01, rmyers1400
@comcast.net says... Walt wrote: Isn't that along the lines of what "Intel Inside" means? Right now, "Intel Inside" refers to the CPU. Intel would just have to change that, to mean the CPU and the chipset too. If a PC builder isn't using an Intel chipset based MB, they would not be allowed to brand their box "Intel Inside". I would think that most people don't know that "Intel Inside" currently only means the CPU, and are already believing that a box branded as "Intel Inside" means EVERYTHING inside is from Intel. Intel would just have to make that true. Do you really think Intel could get the chipset marketing campaign for free like that? For one thing, Intel tolerates licensed chipsets from other manufacturers. If it intends to continue tolerating them, then it needs to maintain reasonable relations with them, and suddenly declaring that the "Intel Inside" moniker would not apply to boxes with licensed non-Intel chipsets would be virtually a declaration of war on licensed chipsets for Intel cpu's--probably not the message Intel wants to send to anyone With as many mistooks as Intel has made over the last couple of years... Nothing would surprise me. What's the ServerWorks deal all about anyway? ...Intel slitting their collective throat once again, as I see it, anyway. Dumb! There is no money in chipsets. They're simply a necessary evil. -- Keith |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
KR Williams wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 04:09:28 -0400, Tony Hill wrote: On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:00:23 -0400, George Macdonald wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:11:31 -0400, KR Williams wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:41:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: Can we look for processors in designer colors next? Only in Macs... You've obviously not shopped for PCs recently. There are kits to put *windows* (how did M$ miss this?) in the sides of cases to see pretty blue lights on the (also optional) lights inside. If you think Apple has a corner on the nutzo's you're just not with it! Can we talk, err.. rice?... for a computer? I'm still waiting for someone to offer a *HUGE* exhaust tip that I can slap on to the back of my power supply fan and a giant airplane wing to give my case more downforce! : Time to patent my electrostatic ionizing chimney which will work in conjunction with the hover lghts. You forgot the "high efficiency" peltier coolers. It's fun to make fun of emotion- and probably hormone-driven gaming PC buyers that you can feel superior to, I guess, but given a choice between game PC buyers as an irrational decision maker (the desktop supercomputer buyers) and the warehouse-sized supercomputer buyers with a taxpayer credit card, I'll take the kids that want their cases to glow as the better bet for the future of computing, thank you very much. They don't hold press conferences to celebrate how smart they are for spending $100 million on their last taxpayer-financed boondoggle or for working out a deal that turns the availability of low-cost university-owned real estate into an opportunity for personal fame with a minimum contribution to science, and they don't expect the whole world to recognize how important they are for owning computers that take up so much real estate. The kids who want to have fun will eventually get us just as much memory, just as many gigaflops, and just as much science as the press-release generators and self-promoters, with a whole lot smaller expenditure of taxpayer dollars and a whole lot less hot air. There. Now I feel better. :-). RM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P4P800-E Deluxe: How to remove an old Intel Chipset Driver? | Peter Wagner | Asus Motherboards | 1 | July 24th 04 11:05 AM |
Intel Is Aiming at Living Rooms in Marketing Its Latest Chip | Vince McGowan | Dell Computers | 0 | June 18th 04 03:10 PM |
Intel D865Perl Chipset problem | bulldog | General | 0 | February 8th 04 02:56 PM |
PC generating unusual "chirrupy" sound? | Coda | General Hardware | 1 | November 20th 03 07:52 PM |
Hard Drive Brands: which is best? | feRRets_inc | General | 17 | November 18th 03 01:10 AM |