Intel Prescott CPU in a Nutshell

I'm not taking credit for the information posted here; I'm merely providing
it as an interest to those who would like to know more about the differences
in these cpus.
** Cut and pasted from a page on the internet dated Feb/2004 **
Intel Prescott CPU in a Nutshell
The boyz at Intel have released their next-generation CPU for desktop
computers, code-named Prescott. If you want to read all the geek-speek, a
Google search pre-configured for the terms Intel Prescott is posted here.
But most folks simply want to to know the answer to two questions:

Do I want one? and How much will they cost? The answer to the first is: not
yet. Right now, Prescotts run a little slower than a similarly clocked
Northwood (due to a longer, 31-stage pipeline). Prescotts will sell for the
same price as their Northwood cousins at identical speed-points.

You will recognize PrEscotts by the addition of the letter 'E' to the CPU
name, such as P4-3.2E. Note that this is NOT the same as the 'EE'
outrageously expensive Extreme Edition CPU, based on the Northwood. You
might also try Atacom.

This is Intel's first major CPU re-design since the release of the Northwood
CPU some two years ago on January 7th, 2002. Note that the current Northwood
P4 max'es out at 3.4-GHz. The Prescott will initially release at the
following (GHz) speed-points: 2.8, 3.0, 3.2, & 3.4.

Note that these new Prescotts are rated no higher than current Northwood
CPUs. In the third quarter we will see speeds of 3.8 & 4.0-GHz. This would
be the time to get a Prescott, since they need the higher clock-rates to
make the longer pipeline worthwhile. All Prescotts run at 800-MHz FSB
(only).

The casual observer will notice no major changes, since the current
Northwood and new Prescott will both wear the same Pentium 4 name tag. The
most significant change is the reduced manufacturing process down to 90-nm
(nano-meter, or 0.09-micron) from the current 130-nm (0.13-micron) used by
today's Northwood.

The smaller manufacturing process results in a corresponding die-size
reduction (smaller chip). Precott is 112-mm², while the Northwood is
131-mm². Usually, smaller chips produce less heat, but the Prescott seems to
buck this trend, which is bad news. Thermal power on the 3.4-GHz Prescott
actually *increases* to 103-watts (from 89-wats for the Northwood of the
same speed). That is one hot chip! Think of the heat produced by a 100-watt
lightbulb, which can burn your hand.

The second-biggest change will be a doubling of the L2 cache to 1-MB (from
Northwood's 512-KB). The L1 cache is also doubled to 16-KB, from Northwood's
8-KB. The larger L1 cache has a higher access latency (bad). It's like a
bigger, slower truck. Will the bigger, slower truck allow you to move your
household effects more quickly? The answer is: it depends (on what you're
moving). It will likely be faster if it allows you to make one trip instead
of two.

Prescott comes with SSE3 (containing 13 new instructions), altho I don't
know of any programs that use these new instructions yet.

It also comes with a longer, 31-stage pipeline (nick-named the "Baskin
Robbins" pipeline) The pipeline is analogous to the length of a car assembly
line. By contrast, the Northwood has a 20-stage pipeline. A longer assembly
line would take longer to produce each car, unless you can speed it up ..
which is what Intel plans to do with Prescott (by increasing the clockrate,
eventually to 5-GHz).

Had enough information overload already? Two final key statistics:

The new Prescott comes with a whopping 125-million transitors (which is
good, the Northwood has 'only' 55-million) and the Prescott uses a slightly
lower default voltage: 1.385-volts (Northwood = 1.5-volts). My advice: buy a
Northwood until Prescotts exceed Northwood speeds. Let others (called "early
adopters") work out the kinks for you. When actual users report the coast is
clear, it will be time to jump in with both feet.

If you currently have a motherboard with either the Intel 865 or 875
chipset, you should be able to run a Prescott with a simple BIOS
flash-update, since they use the same 478-pin configuration as current
Northwood P4s. If you're interested in Prescott overclocking, see here and
here. Personally, I'm concerned by the fact that Prescotts run hotter than
Northwoods. Heat is a CPU's worst enemy and is always bad for stability.

The succesor to the Prescott will be code-named "Tejas" (pronounced
"teh'-hass"), scheduled for release somewhere around January, 2005. Other
rumors claim Intel may've scrapped the Tejas project.

Note that these new Prescotts are rated no higher than current Northwood
CPUs. In the third quarter we will see speeds of 3.8 & 4.0-GHz. This would
be the time to get a Prescott, since they need the higher clock-rates to
make the longer pipeline worthwhile. All Prescotts run at 800-MHz FSB
(only).

The succesor to the Prescott will be code-named "Tejas" (pronounced
"teh'-hass"), scheduled for release somewhere around January, 2005. Other
rumors claim Intel may've scrapped the Tejas project.


Tejas scrapped, and they also scrapped the 4ghz prescotts....

i think the P6 core design (P3) will be making a comeback..........

--
From Adam Webb, Overlag
www.tacticalgamer.com
CS:SOURCE server now active




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.830 / Virus Database: 565 - Release Date: 06/01/2005