A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why so very small amount of thermal compound?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 16th 04, 12:00 AM
Navid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why so very small amount of thermal compound?

I have read posts that suggest minimal thermal compound. The Arctic Silver
instructions also suggest a very small amount.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_s...structions.htm

I understand this advice if the concern is that too much compound may
contaminate the pins and cause electrical problems. But, I don't understand
it if the concern is heat transfer.
I realize that the objective is to only fill the microscopic gaps between
the two surfaces.

After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides. The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?
Am I missing something?

Thanks,

Navid



  #2  
Old June 16th 04, 02:13 AM
BananaOfTheNight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I understand this advice if the concern is that too much compound may
contaminate the pins and cause electrical problems. But, I don't understand
it if the concern is heat transfer.


The thermal conductivity of any fluid or suspension, however
well-designed, will never be as good as the thermal conductivity of a
metal. This is due to the way in which heat flows - heat is a
consequence of the random motion of atoms and is transmitted more
efficiently if the atoms are bonded in a regular (dense) structure, with
lots of (relatively) weak bonds to transmit the random vibrations along.

Hence, you want to apply as little as possible, only filling the valleys
between the surfaces (removing air which does not conduct heat well),
but not adding any more layers (of less thermal conductivity than the
heatsink) than is absolutely necessary between the chip and the sink.

The ultimate 'thermal compound' would be liquid metal that gets poured
between the chip and sink and forms a perfect seal upon cooling.
However, this would destroy your chip...

I realize that the objective is to only fill the microscopic gaps between
the two surfaces.


This is because the thermal conductivity of your Arctic Silver (or even
generic thermal grease) is greater than that of air, so you remove all
air pockets.

After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides. The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?


There will always be a small amount of thermal compound between the
peaks, however little, as it will be nigh-on impossible to remove all of
it purely by pressure. However, the separation between the peaks will be
much less than that between valleys, as the force is indeed rather large.
  #3  
Old June 16th 04, 02:17 AM
David Besack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides. The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?


Well, the same theory could be applied to water under a car's tires, and
yet cars DO hydroplane.

You are right the force is great, but some small amount will remain.
  #4  
Old June 16th 04, 04:24 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Navid wrote:
I have read posts that suggest minimal thermal compound. The Arctic Silver
instructions also suggest a very small amount.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_s...structions.htm

I understand this advice if the concern is that too much compound may
contaminate the pins and cause electrical problems. But, I don't understand
it if the concern is heat transfer.
I realize that the objective is to only fill the microscopic gaps between
the two surfaces.

After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides. The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?
Am I missing something?


The force isn't as high as you think and the thermal compound doesn't flow
as easily as you think.


Thanks,

Navid




  #5  
Old June 16th 04, 04:47 AM
Navid
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"David Besack" wrote in message
...
After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces
together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides.
The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the
peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?


Well, the same theory could be applied to water under a car's tires, and
yet cars DO hydroplane.

You are right the force is great, but some small amount will remain.


OK.
So, the pressure is not enough to get rid of all the compound between the
peaks, and a small layer remains.
Thanks for correcting me.


  #6  
Old June 17th 04, 06:17 AM
Mercury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Navid" wrote in message
. com...
I have read posts that suggest minimal thermal compound. The Arctic

Silver
instructions also suggest a very small amount.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_s...structions.htm

I understand this advice if the concern is that too much compound may
contaminate the pins and cause electrical problems. But, I don't

understand
it if the concern is heat transfer.
I realize that the objective is to only fill the microscopic gaps between
the two surfaces.

After the heat sink is mounted, the force pushing the two surfaces

together
is so high that any extra compound will be squeezed out of the sides. The
compound is a fluid after all. There will be no compound between the

peaks
(only in the valleys). Is that not true?
Am I missing something?


A layer will always remain, impeding heat transfer.

That said, you can glop on as much compound as you like, and the pressure of
the heatsink will push out enough to always give you half-decent
temperatures.

Unless you're a mad overclocker who wants every single megahertz and every
single 0.1 degree, you shouldn't worry about it. I certainly don't, and I
overclock, AND I've never had heat issues.


  #7  
Old June 17th 04, 09:54 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:17:45 -0400, "Mercury"
wrote:


"Navid" wrote in message
.com...
I have read posts that suggest minimal thermal compound. The Arctic

Silver
instructions also suggest a very small amount.
http://www.arcticsilver.com/arctic_s...structions.htm



A layer will always remain, impeding heat transfer.

That said, you can glop on as much compound as you like, and the pressure of
the heatsink will push out enough to always give you half-decent
temperatures.

Unless you're a mad overclocker who wants every single megahertz and every
single 0.1 degree, you shouldn't worry about it. I certainly don't, and I
overclock, AND I've never had heat issues.



A wonderful approach.

The moron's guide to unending stupidity.

...of course, those with IQ's over 40 understand it's easier to just
use less.

but... the morons will always be with us.

Let's have a hand for the moron. And let me say it's always been such
a pleasure working with people like you.


  #8  
Old June 17th 04, 10:45 AM
Lech Staniewicz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A layer will always remain, impeding heat transfer.

True, but it won't impede heat transfer as much as air will - that's why
you apply the stuff in the first place. Adding too much could cause the
stuff to glop out and bridge 2 pins. Some thermal compounds are
conductive, so you have just b0rked your system by doing that. AS is
slightly capacitive, so it could do nasty things to system stability if
it were to flow across 2 pins, and others are electrically neutral (like
their Ceramique compound) so you could smear your whole board in it and
suffer no ill effects.

Plus your syringe of AS will last longer if you use the tiny amounts
prescribed.
  #9  
Old June 17th 04, 11:01 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lech Staniewicz wrote:

A layer will always remain, impeding heat transfer.



True, but it won't impede heat transfer as much as air will


Not necessarily true. With the proper amount there is contact with only the
voids filled but with too much there is a layer of the thermal compound
between the two surfaces, separating them. Where, before, with 'dry, you
had contact with some air, too much has thermal compound between all of it
and that layer can be worse than the smaller amount of air in the dry mating.

See he

http://power.ece.uiuc.edu/Balog/imag...lectronics.pdf

The principles are the same for processor heatsinks.



- that's why
you apply the stuff in the first place. Adding too much could cause the
stuff to glop out and bridge 2 pins. Some thermal compounds are
conductive, so you have just b0rked your system by doing that. AS is
slightly capacitive, so it could do nasty things to system stability if
it were to flow across 2 pins, and others are electrically neutral (like
their Ceramique compound) so you could smear your whole board in it and
suffer no ill effects.

Plus your syringe of AS will last longer if you use the tiny amounts
prescribed.


  #10  
Old June 17th 04, 10:01 PM
Mercury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
...

Let's have a hand for the moron.


Maybe instead of calling me a moron you could explain what it is I said that
you consider wrong.

Obviously glopping on heatsink compound is wasteful and runs the risk of
causing electrical problems.

My point was that one shouldn't worry about getting the
impossibly-ultra-thin layer that is mentined in the AS3 instructions.

And it's not "easier to use less". I tried the "half-grain of rice", and I
don't have the patience or dexterity to work with it. I put on enough to get
a nice even layer using a credit card. Like buttering toast.

If you don't like it, do it your own way, and don't me a moron.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Took off Heatsink and no thermal compound left any reason this would happen ? We Live For The One We Die For The One General 1 May 4th 04 03:19 AM
Took off Heatsink and no thermal compound left any reason this would happen ? We Live For The One We Die For The One Overclocking 1 May 4th 04 12:35 AM
So what if thermal compound spreads? Will Dormann General 134 April 20th 04 12:51 PM
Best thermal compound? feedhead Overclocking 1 August 14th 03 12:50 AM
Intel thermal pad or Arctic Silver? kony General 3 July 4th 03 12:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.