If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How could 192 TB be squeezed on a half-inch tape?
Perusing the future LTO standards, there is LTO-12 192 TB (uncompressed).
Currently at LTO-8 with 12 TB. I believe LTO-10 48 TB will happen, but after that seems to be a wish list. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How could 192 TB be squeezed on a half-inch tape?
There is a conference paper by Fuji where they claim to have achieved more
than that - 220 TB! Mostly a new magnetic material, and thinner longer tape. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Housing two 2.5-inch hard disks in one 3.5-inch drive bay? | Man-wai Chang to The Door (24000bps) | Storage (alternative) | 11 | March 29th 10 07:42 PM |
16-inch server, 19-inch rack | robert.waters | General | 0 | October 11th 06 11:04 PM |
Gaming work-around for Half-Life / Half-Life2 | Larry Hodges | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | November 14th 05 04:39 PM |
Thermal transfer material squeezed out? Just the facts. | Matt | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | April 15th 04 01:15 AM |
Maxtor HD 20 GB squeezed to 10 GB by OEM, how to unsqueeze? | Ron | Homebuilt PC's | 15 | September 13th 03 11:25 PM |