A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Crucial bit-rotted not



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 5th 19, 01:21 AM posted to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Flasherly[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,407
Default Crucial bit-rotted not


Crucial_CT256MX100SSD1, released for first MLC 16nm SSD.

Bought it possibly five years ago, and implemented for data storage
considerations three or more years ago. The smallest consideration is
then a 30G directory in storage stasis for the hypothesized time:

Info
- date: 12/4/2019
- process: Compare
- source: Crucial_CT256MX100SSD1:\com\
- reference: :\com\
- reference volume label: 960 EVO

Basic statistics
- time elapsed: 00:06:23
- overall transfer [kB/s]: 102,033
- folders processed: 1179
- files processed: 29856
- source bytes read: 37.3 GB (40,039,430,581 bytes)
- source average transfer [kB/s]: 148,098
- source clean transfer [kB/s]: 151,099
- reference bytes read: 37.3 GB (40,039,430,581 bytes)
- reference average transfer [kB/s]: 228,348
- reference clean transfer [kB/s]: 231,992

Errors
- errors: 0
- warnings: 0
- other: 0

The above mechanics are actually a little different, as I'm migrating
partitions for reconstruction. The Crucial is a copy from an original
500G plattered HDD, whereas the above operative is a bit-by-bit
comparison of the 29856 processed files --

Product: CDCheck
Version: 3.1.3.0 stable release
Author: Mitja Perko

Viz: Crucial to 960Evo, then 960Evo to comparison of files from
original HDD storage location.

If to say, estimably so within a minimal framework of 3 years
residence on the Crucial, that there's no bit-parity errors evident
(nor needless to mention perhaps a decade on the actual "source", a WD
from pre-Terabyte vintage).

I only work in FAT32, i.e. from OEM non-Microsoft partition utilities,
which I've several such to circumvent Microsoft later constraints in
deference to NTFS;- At and up to certain points, of course, where and
should the a)O OS declares FAT32 illegal, or b) for but a singular
instance of a NTFS drive permitted files not normally approaching 4G,
at FAT32 limits, and beyond.

As I would as well realize a SSD ought not be unplugged needlessly
from an otherwise active state SSD controllers would normally engage
to maintain their data health status. (I do however minimize OS
augmentation of such routines through such as TRIM command
initiations;- as some references are given to understand they're as
well a contingency of the controller itself in a fallback-state,
usually run in duplicity after a specific time state of SSD
inactivity.)
  #2  
Old December 5th 19, 01:44 AM posted to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Flasherly[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,407
Default Crucial bit-rotted not

On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 19:21:59 -0500, Flasherly
wrote:

I'm of the opinion they really ought to invent a 12- or 24-bay
effectively RAID array, just not for the usually price of $15,000/US.

This should be of my own design, exclusively for SSDs in permanent
stasis with optionally USB3 connectivity solely for consumer
application.

$50/US should then about cover it, as the 24 SSD drives will be
controller maintained within ongoing equilibrium provided by a couple,
maybe four fine Sanyo/Panasonic Eneloop AAA NiMH.

There will a low-power indicator and/or operational charge
characteristics in normal override whenever a USB connection is
present. And it should altogether be no bigger than any average
900-pp book not already scanned.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crucial Adrenaline Roy Colson General 4 March 25th 12 09:26 PM
Are the DIMMs on the Crucial websites the only Crucial ones that will work? mm General 5 December 5th 10 05:43 PM
Crucial Ballistix and Crucial Ballistix Tracer Daave Homebuilt PC's 0 January 31st 08 11:10 PM
crucial memory Christo General 1 April 26th 05 11:18 PM
A8N-SLI with Crucial RAM Rob Nicholson Asus Motherboards 26 February 8th 05 01:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.