If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
Hello to all and thanks in advance for any help and advise on this:
I have several Optiplex GX-150's that I have purchased used. I need to install 160gig HD's as the C drive in four of them. I've done HD installs before but I seem to be missing something this time around. The system bios (A11) says the capacity for Primary Drive 0 is 160gigs. That's correct. However, when I do an Fdisk and set the primary DOS partition I'm getting back a capacity of 21553 Mbytes (Usage 100%). Nowhere near 160gigs. I've done the Fdisk twice (and rebooted from power off) and on two machines and I'm getting the same results. Any suggestions? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
What operating system do you intend to run? FDISK will not allow a partition
of 160GB. If you plan to run either Windows (2000 or XP) or Linux, the OS installer has built-in drive partitioning and formatting... Ben Myers On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:45:23 GMT, scooterspal wrote: Hello to all and thanks in advance for any help and advise on this: I have several Optiplex GX-150's that I have purchased used. I need to install 160gig HD's as the C drive in four of them. I've done HD installs before but I seem to be missing something this time around. The system bios (A11) says the capacity for Primary Drive 0 is 160gigs. That's correct. However, when I do an Fdisk and set the primary DOS partition I'm getting back a capacity of 21553 Mbytes (Usage 100%). Nowhere near 160gigs. I've done the Fdisk twice (and rebooted from power off) and on two machines and I'm getting the same results. Any suggestions? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
"scooterspal" wrote in message ... Hello to all and thanks in advance for any help and advise on this: I have several Optiplex GX-150's that I have purchased used. I need to install 160gig HD's as the C drive in four of them. I've done HD installs before but I seem to be missing something this time around. The system bios (A11) says the capacity for Primary Drive 0 is 160gigs. That's correct. However, when I do an Fdisk and set the primary DOS partition I'm getting back a capacity of 21553 Mbytes (Usage 100%). Nowhere near 160gigs. I've done the Fdisk twice (and rebooted from power off) and on two machines and I'm getting the same results. Any suggestions? FDisk may not show the correct capacity.* This cropped up with a second-hand HD I purchased on eBay. It was supposed to be 80 gig (and was) but showed up smaller on Fdisk. Format it as normal, and then check the size in DOS, Windows or whatever OS you're using. michael adams * This may be a documented bug. I never bothered to check. .... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
"scooterspal" wrote in message
... Hello to all and thanks in advance for any help and advise on this: I have several Optiplex GX-150's that I have purchased used. I need to install 160gig HD's as the C drive in four of them. I've done HD installs before but I seem to be missing something this time around. The system bios (A11) says the capacity for Primary Drive 0 is 160gigs. That's correct. However, when I do an Fdisk and set the primary DOS partition I'm getting back a capacity of 21553 Mbytes (Usage 100%). Nowhere near 160gigs. I've done the Fdisk twice (and rebooted from power off) and on two machines and I'm getting the same results. Any suggestions? FDisk may not show the correct capacity.* This cropped up with a second-hand HD I purchased on eBay. It was supposed to be 80 gig (and was) but showed up smaller on Fdisk. Format it as normal, and then check the size in DOS, Windows or whatever OS you're using. * This may be a documented bug. I never bothered to check. * It is, under Win98SE, 98, 95, etc at least - http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=263044#appliesto However, IMO none of the fixes are necessary as it's only a bug in "reporting" the size not in the actual partitioning. It also seems to be a bug in calculating the capacity, rather than in calculating the percentage. So if you wanted to create multiple partitions - which I didn't on the 80g disk - then if you based your partitions on the percentage figures and ignored the quoted capacities then this might produce satisfactory results. michael adams .... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
FDisk may not show the correct capacity. Thanks for the replies. So are you both saying go ahead with what I've done... Fdisk as 21553Mbytes... and then do the install of the OS (it will be W2K professional) and reformat the drive from there? That will give me the correct 160gig drive size at that point, do you think? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
"scooterspal" wrote in message .. . FDisk may not show the correct capacity. Thanks for the replies. So are you both saying go ahead with what I've done... Fdisk as 21553Mbytes... and then do the install of the OS (it will be W2K professional) and reformat the drive from there? You need to format the disk before you can install the OS. Not afterwards. You can then confirm the size using the same OS you used to format the disk with. michael adams That will give me the correct 160gig drive size at that point, do you think? .... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
FDisk may not show the correct capacity.
Hey, guys. I did a "format C:" from my boot floppy on one of them and got back 152,588 Mb (160gig drive) so I guess I'm all set. As you thought, it is only Fdisk that is confused about the actual size. Thanks for the help on this! George |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
"scooterspal" wrote in message
.. . FDisk may not show the correct capacity. Thanks for the replies. So are you both saying go ahead with what I've done... Fdisk as 21553Mbytes... and then do the install of the OS (it will be W2K professional) and reformat the drive from there? That will give me the correct 160gig drive size at that point, do you think? you do not need to fdisk or format a drive before you start a windows 2000 installation. you boot the machine from the windows 2000 cd and follow prompts. the windows 2000 installation will come to a point where is asks you about partitioned and unpartitioned space and allows you to delete or create partitions as desired. then it goes to ask about formatting. i think you should delete any existing partitions you may have and create a new single large partition from this utility and at very least should reformat the drive with ntfs when asked. given the method that you formatted the drive in dos it is a fat32 file structure that lacks the security and efficiency of ntfs. http://www.windowsreinstall.com/inst...lw2k/page1.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
wrong. you simply boot from the windows 2000 cd. you can partion and
format the drive durring the installation procedure. furthermore, if you format the drive with fat durring installtion you can change the format of the drive to ntfs after the os is installed and do so in a way that you will not have to reinstall the os. "michael adams" wrote in message ... "scooterspal" wrote in message .. . FDisk may not show the correct capacity. Thanks for the replies. So are you both saying go ahead with what I've done... Fdisk as 21553Mbytes... and then do the install of the OS (it will be W2K professional) and reformat the drive from there? You need to format the disk before you can install the OS. Not afterwards. You can then confirm the size using the same OS you used to format the disk with. michael adams That will give me the correct 160gig drive size at that point, do you think? ... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Optiplex GX150: Not showing correct HD size
NOOOOOO!!!! The Windows 2000 install finds the hard drive, examines all of
the partitions, and offers the user various options for setting up and formatting partitions. Running FDISK first only makes matters worse. See my earlier response... Ben Myers On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:57:13 +0100, "michael adams" wrote: "scooterspal" wrote in message . .. FDisk may not show the correct capacity. Thanks for the replies. So are you both saying go ahead with what I've done... Fdisk as 21553Mbytes... and then do the install of the OS (it will be W2K professional) and reformat the drive from there? You need to format the disk before you can install the OS. Not afterwards. You can then confirm the size using the same OS you used to format the disk with. michael adams That will give me the correct 160gig drive size at that point, do you think? ... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Optiplex GX150 - max disk size? | Nils-Eivind Naas | Dell Computers | 2 | March 18th 06 03:47 AM |
Optiplex GX150 Beeps | [email protected] | Dell Computers | 8 | February 6th 06 11:01 PM |
Optiplex GX150 Help needed... | AB | Dell Computers | 0 | September 8th 05 10:58 AM |
Optiplex GX150 - High Density RAM ok? | [email protected] | Dell Computers | 2 | July 12th 05 02:04 AM |
Problem with Optiplex GX150 CD drive eject button | Cerridwen | General | 1 | February 16th 04 09:37 AM |