Advantages of Parallel Hz

On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?

FYI, serial processors running extremely high clock rates without
cooling equipment, can easily fry. Either you need a cooling system or
parallel-Hz. I would like the latter since I want my PC to have the
least amount of moving parts.

"Radium" wrote in message
oups.com...
On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?

Sure it is. But you clearly don't have a clue about how
to do that.

I do realize that you're a troll - I would just like you to consider
becoming a more amusing one.

Bob M.

Radium wrote:
On May 4, 5:32 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:


Yes, you've SAID that before, but you have yet to give
any indication at all that it means anything.


How does it not mean anything?

Why aren't you laughing all the way to the bank ??

You have nothing,

good bye

On May 4, 7:41 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

"Radium" wrote in message
:
oups.com...

On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?

Sure it is. But you clearly don't have a clue about how
to do that.

Use parallel-Hz. Simple.

No offense but I would appreciate serious responses to my questions.
Please leave out the dark humor.

On 5/4/07 9:47 PM, in article
, "Radium"
wrote:

On May 4, 7:41 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

"Radium" wrote in message
:
oups.com...

On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?

Sure it is. But you clearly don't have a clue about how
to do that.

Use parallel-Hz. Simple.

How do you plan to use the 1 Hz. Clock pulses? Just give us an example of
HOW you will use a few of the one pps clock lines to achieve anything useful
at a rate exceeding one pps.

No offense but I would appreciate serious responses to my questions.
Please leave out the dark humor.


You aren't a serious enough troll.

On May 4, 7:32 pm, Radium wrote:
On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?

FYI, serial processors running extremely high clock rates without
cooling equipment, can easily fry. Either you need a cooling system or
parallel-Hz. I would like the latter since I want my PC to have the
least amount of moving parts.


FYI: 1 billion processors all losing 1mW is still 1KW ow power being
turned into heat. As you have already been told, the leakage current
alone will destroy your system. Your idea doesn't work.

On May 4, 11:18 pm, MooseFET wrote:

FYI: 1 billion processors all losing 1mW is still 1KW ow power being
turned into heat. As you have already been told, the leakage current
alone will destroy your system.

Couldn't circuitry be designed in such a way that the leakage current
will travel in a path out of the system, instead of toward vital
circuits?

On 4 May 2007 19:32:24 -0700, Radium
wrote:

On May 4, 7:09 pm, "Bob Myers" wrote:

Just your usual talent at expressing yourself, I guess.

So you don't think it's important to keep circuits from overheating?



It's not important to fixate on it like you need some change
instead of just learning how world+dog does it already.

You constantly demonstrate an inability to use current tech.
That is not a sign you have some advanced insight, it is a
sign you have a lot to work to do to merely become up to
speed with everyone else.

On 1 May 2007 23:46:36 -0700, in sci.electronics.design Radium
wrote:

Hi:

Below is an example of "parallel Hz"

http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif

If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them,


http://pag.csail.mit.edu/~adonovan/d...h=11&year=1995


martin

"Radium" wrote in message
ups.com...
On May 4, 11:18 pm, MooseFET wrote:

FYI: 1 billion processors all losing 1mW is still 1KW ow power being
turned into heat. As you have already been told, the leakage current
alone will destroy your system.

Couldn't circuitry be designed in such a way that the leakage current
will travel in a path out of the system, instead of toward vital
circuits?


You still don't get it, do you?
Show the physical layout of the clocking circuit on a PCB. You're suggesting
that you can build a computer having a BILLION individual clock lines, each
running at 1pps?? That's just for 1GHz... How many clock lines does that
figure out to be if you wanted to speed up the computer to 4GHz?

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

--
Dave M
MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the
address)

Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer to the end, the faster it goes.