A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

RAID0 vs. RAID5 - Benchmark



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 04, 12:04 PM
Ingo Seibold
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default RAID0 vs. RAID5 - Benchmark

about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a
RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System?

Ingo



  #2  
Old November 11th 04, 12:36 PM
DanielEKFA
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ingo Seibold wrote:

about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a
RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System?

Ingo


Depends a lot on the controller. RAID5 will be slower to write unless you
have an extremely evil controller, but with a good RAID5 controller, reads
could match those of a RAID0 system, although the calculation would be:

RAID0 speed with X disks == RAID5 speed with X+1 disks.

At least that's what I'm told

Either way, the security provided by RAID5 is invaluable, the SX4000 has
been my best spent money in a long time!

--
I win!
  #3  
Old November 11th 04, 01:53 PM
Arno Wagner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Previously Ingo Seibold wrote:
about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a
RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System?


If you have reasonably fast disks the read speed will be limited by
the PCI speed, unless you have 66MHz PCI, 64 bit PCI or PCI-E and a
matching RAID controller. Write speed depends on the card. I have had
an Adaptec SATA RAID5 card reading and writing slower than Linux
software RAID.

In short: Reading should be about the same, maybe a bit (25%) slower.
Writing is impossible to tell without knoing the details of the
RAID% and the RAID0 solution being compared. Usually knowing
the details will still not be enough and actual benchmarking
is the only option.

And of course it depends on the specific benchmark used.

Arno
--
For email address: lastname AT tik DOT ee DOT ethz DOT ch
GnuPG: ID:1E25338F FP:0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws" - Tacitus


  #4  
Old November 11th 04, 05:07 PM
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Arno Wagner wrote:

Previously Ingo Seibold wrote:
about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a
RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System?


If you have reasonably fast disks the read speed will be limited by
the PCI speed, unless you have 66MHz PCI, 64 bit PCI or PCI-E and a
matching RAID controller.


Depends on the size of the array and the data pattern. If the data is such
that most reads are sequential then the bus could be the limiting factor.
If most reads are of random sectors then access time is still going to
dominate.

Write speed depends on the card. I have had
an Adaptec SATA RAID5 card reading and writing slower than Linux
software RAID.

In short: Reading should be about the same, maybe a bit (25%) slower.
Writing is impossible to tell without knoing the details of the
RAID% and the RAID0 solution being compared. Usually knowing
the details will still not be enough and actual benchmarking
is the only option.

And of course it depends on the specific benchmark used.

Arno


--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Max number of drives in RAID5 set Steve Christall Storage & Hardrives 3 January 10th 05 05:45 PM
RAID5 vs RAID10 speed benchmark? - C - Storage & Hardrives 15 June 15th 04 09:35 PM
120 gb is the Largest hard drive I can put in my 4550? David H. Lipman Dell Computers 65 December 11th 03 01:51 PM
Newbie storage questions... (RAID5, SANs, SCSI) David Sworder Storage & Hardrives 17 December 2nd 03 01:10 AM
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark rms Overclocking AMD Processors 7 October 5th 03 10:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.