If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RAID0 vs. RAID5 - Benchmark
about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a
RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System? Ingo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ingo Seibold wrote:
about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System? Ingo Depends a lot on the controller. RAID5 will be slower to write unless you have an extremely evil controller, but with a good RAID5 controller, reads could match those of a RAID0 system, although the calculation would be: RAID0 speed with X disks == RAID5 speed with X+1 disks. At least that's what I'm told Either way, the security provided by RAID5 is invaluable, the SX4000 has been my best spent money in a long time! -- I win! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Previously Ingo Seibold wrote:
about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System? If you have reasonably fast disks the read speed will be limited by the PCI speed, unless you have 66MHz PCI, 64 bit PCI or PCI-E and a matching RAID controller. Write speed depends on the card. I have had an Adaptec SATA RAID5 card reading and writing slower than Linux software RAID. In short: Reading should be about the same, maybe a bit (25%) slower. Writing is impossible to tell without knoing the details of the RAID% and the RAID0 solution being compared. Usually knowing the details will still not be enough and actual benchmarking is the only option. And of course it depends on the specific benchmark used. Arno -- For email address: lastname AT tik DOT ee DOT ethz DOT ch GnuPG: ID:1E25338F FP:0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws" - Tacitus |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Arno Wagner wrote:
Previously Ingo Seibold wrote: about how many percent goes the benchmarkable speed down when I change a RAID0 Sytem with 4 hard disks to a RAID5 System? If you have reasonably fast disks the read speed will be limited by the PCI speed, unless you have 66MHz PCI, 64 bit PCI or PCI-E and a matching RAID controller. Depends on the size of the array and the data pattern. If the data is such that most reads are sequential then the bus could be the limiting factor. If most reads are of random sectors then access time is still going to dominate. Write speed depends on the card. I have had an Adaptec SATA RAID5 card reading and writing slower than Linux software RAID. In short: Reading should be about the same, maybe a bit (25%) slower. Writing is impossible to tell without knoing the details of the RAID% and the RAID0 solution being compared. Usually knowing the details will still not be enough and actual benchmarking is the only option. And of course it depends on the specific benchmark used. Arno -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max number of drives in RAID5 set | Steve Christall | Storage & Hardrives | 3 | January 10th 05 05:45 PM |
RAID5 vs RAID10 speed benchmark? | - C - | Storage & Hardrives | 15 | June 15th 04 09:35 PM |
120 gb is the Largest hard drive I can put in my 4550? | David H. Lipman | Dell Computers | 65 | December 11th 03 01:51 PM |
Newbie storage questions... (RAID5, SANs, SCSI) | David Sworder | Storage & Hardrives | 17 | December 2nd 03 01:10 AM |
Athlon 64 Vs. Pentium 4 article: On the Justification for Quake3 as a CPU Benchmark | rms | Overclocking AMD Processors | 7 | October 5th 03 10:05 PM |