If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Hi,
I am trying to download drivers and a diagnostic diskette, but I don't know what exact model I do own. It is, however a small form factor model with the following specifications: - PIII, 450 MHz - 64 MB SDRAM - IDE disk 10 GB - Intel Chipset FW82443BX & FW82371EB The only label show a number, beginning with 89... -- Gruß, Andreas http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de E-Mail nur an die Antwortadresse und mit "Usenet" im Betreff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Only DeskPros were made in the small form factor. Chipset is Intel 440BX.
Perhaps an early DeskPro EN? ...Ben Myers On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 03:06:04 +0100, "Andreas Randolf" wrote: Hi, I am trying to download drivers and a diagnostic diskette, but I don't know what exact model I do own. It is, however a small form factor model with the following specifications: - PIII, 450 MHz - 64 MB SDRAM - IDE disk 10 GB - Intel Chipset FW82443BX & FW82371EB The only label show a number, beginning with 89... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Hal Ben,
Only DeskPros were made in the small form factor. Perhaps an early DeskPro EN? Yes is is, thanks. How Do I find out the exact model? The Compaq Diagnostics software tells me a lot about the system, but not the model number. Regards, -- Gruß, Andreas http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de E-Mail nur an die Antwortadresse und mit "Usenet" im Betreff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
On Mar 9, 12:17 am, "Andreas Randolf" wrote:
Hal Ben, Only DeskPros were made in the small form factor. Perhaps an early DeskPro EN? Yes is is, thanks. How Do I find out the exact model? The Compaq Diagnostics software tells me a lot about the system, but not the model number. Regards, -- Gruß, Andreas http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de E-Mail nur an die Antwortadresse und mit "Usenet" im Betreff Being as it's a pentium 3, 450mhz, small form factor; how about: "Compaq Deskpro EN Small Form Factor P450+/810e" http://h20180.www2.hp.com/apps/Nav?h...ang=en&cc=u s The "P" series are Pentium 3s, followed by the megahertz number. Where the celeron's are the "C" series. The 810e refers to the graphics. In this case it's the Intel 82810e integrated graphics. (which is available direct from intel, if you can't find it at hp ). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Good memory there. From the standpoint of software drivers, all the SFF
computers with the 810e chipset are the same, regardless of CPU. It is also possible to upgrade the later models to a 1GHz Pentium 3 or a 1.1GHz Celeron, either one operating in the 1.65v -1.7v range... Ben Myers On 9 Mar 2007 18:15:12 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 9, 12:17 am, "Andreas Randolf" wrote: Hal Ben, Only DeskPros were made in the small form factor. Perhaps an early DeskPro EN? Yes is is, thanks. How Do I find out the exact model? The Compaq Diagnostics software tells me a lot about the system, but not the model number. Regards, -- Gruß, Andreas http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de E-Mail nur an die Antwortadresse und mit "Usenet" im Betreff Being as it's a pentium 3, 450mhz, small form factor; how about: "Compaq Deskpro EN Small Form Factor P450+/810e" http://h20180.www2.hp.com/apps/Nav?h...ang=en&cc= us The "P" series are Pentium 3s, followed by the megahertz number. Where the celeron's are the "C" series. The 810e refers to the graphics. In this case it's the Intel 82810e integrated graphics. (which is available direct from intel, if you can't find it at hp ). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
On Mar 9, 6:44 pm, Ben Myers
wrote: Good memory there. This is the generation of computers I deal with daily. My memory is pretty fresh on these. From the standpoint of software drivers, all the SFF computers with the 810e chipset are the same, regardless of CPU. It is also possible to upgrade the later models to a 1GHz Pentium 3 or a 1.1GHz Celeron, either one operating in the 1.65v -1.7v range... Ben Myers I've never seen a 450mhz in a socket. All I've ever seen in that speed is slots. I think it's possible to go faster, since the 450mhz is almost the slowest p3 ever made. But slots require a bit of force to pull in and out, so I don't like swapping them out if I don't have to. Slots are made up to 1ghz (maybe a tad more), but they're very rare above 650mhz or so. And the slotkets are pretty evil, they often don't seat properly. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
I deal with these some, but less and less lately.
I do not think that the 450MHz P3 was ever made in a Socket 370. Slowest Socket 370 P3's I've ever seen are 550MHz. Yeah, Slot 1 was a very stupid idea. Fortunately, Slot 1 died out really fast with the intro of Socket 370 and PC133 memory. Not too many Slot 1 boards were made to handle the PC133 Slot 1 CPUs. Slotkets suck almost as badly as Slot 1 itself... Ben Myers On 9 Mar 2007 18:54:41 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 9, 6:44 pm, Ben Myers wrote: Good memory there. This is the generation of computers I deal with daily. My memory is pretty fresh on these. From the standpoint of software drivers, all the SFF computers with the 810e chipset are the same, regardless of CPU. It is also possible to upgrade the later models to a 1GHz Pentium 3 or a 1.1GHz Celeron, either one operating in the 1.65v -1.7v range... Ben Myers I've never seen a 450mhz in a socket. All I've ever seen in that speed is slots. I think it's possible to go faster, since the 450mhz is almost the slowest p3 ever made. But slots require a bit of force to pull in and out, so I don't like swapping them out if I don't have to. Slots are made up to 1ghz (maybe a tad more), but they're very rare above 650mhz or so. And the slotkets are pretty evil, they often don't seat properly. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
On Mar 9, 9:58 pm, Ben Myers
wrote: I deal with these some, but less and less lately. I do not think that the 450MHz P3 was ever made in a Socket 370. Slowest Socket 370 P3's I've ever seen are 550MHz. They go down to 500mhz. But the socket 370 Celerons go a bit lower. 333ish, I think. You see them in old etowers, and pavillions. Slowest p3 I've ever seen was 400mhz, and it lived in a Fujitsu tablet pc. (A Prototype, with a touch screen and wireless.) I think it was custom ordered, or was really a faster processor, and just downclocked. Yeah, Slot 1 was a very stupid idea. Fortunately, Slot 1 died out really fast with the intro of Socket 370 and PC133 memory. Not too many Slot 1 boards were made to handle the PC133 Slot 1 CPUs. Slotkets suck almost as badly as Slot 1 itself... Ben Myers IMO, Slotkets suck worse than the slot 1 itself. They have a tendency to come unseated. At least the true slots stay put once wrangled into place. On 9 Mar 2007 18:54:41 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 9, 6:44 pm, Ben Myers wrote: Good memory there. This is the generation of computers I deal with daily. My memory is pretty fresh on these. From the standpoint of software drivers, all the SFF computers with the 810e chipset are the same, regardless of CPU. It is also possible to upgrade the later models to a 1GHz Pentium 3 or a 1.1GHz Celeron, either one operating in the 1.65v -1.7v range... Ben Myers I've never seen a 450mhz in a socket. All I've ever seen in that speed is slots. I think it's possible to go faster, since the 450mhz is almost the slowest p3 ever made. But slots require a bit of force to pull in and out, so I don't like swapping them out if I don't have to. Slots are made up to 1ghz (maybe a tad more), but they're very rare above 650mhz or so. And the slotkets are pretty evil, they often don't seat properly. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Hi Paul,
Being as it's a pentium 3, 450mhz, small form factor; how about: "Compaq Deskpro EN Small Form Factor P450+/810e" The 810e refers to the graphics. In this case it's the Intel 82810e integrated graphics. There's a ATI graphics chip onboard. So it must be a different model. The Pentium 3 sits in a slot, not a socket. -- Gruß, Andreas http://www.liegerad-fernweh.de E-Mail nur an die Antwortadresse und mit "Usenet" im Betreff |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Which model do I own?
Socket 370 Celerys were made in speeds as low as 333MHz, using the same PGA
ceramic packaging as the later Pentium and Pentium MMX chips. The later Celerons, 566Mhz and above, used the newer green plastic FCPGA packaging. AFAIK, Socket 370 Pentium 3s were only manufactured as FCPGA. A pox on all slotted processors. May we never see them again... Ben Myers On 10 Mar 2007 00:03:06 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 9, 9:58 pm, Ben Myers wrote: I deal with these some, but less and less lately. I do not think that the 450MHz P3 was ever made in a Socket 370. Slowest Socket 370 P3's I've ever seen are 550MHz. They go down to 500mhz. But the socket 370 Celerons go a bit lower. 333ish, I think. You see them in old etowers, and pavillions. Slowest p3 I've ever seen was 400mhz, and it lived in a Fujitsu tablet pc. (A Prototype, with a touch screen and wireless.) I think it was custom ordered, or was really a faster processor, and just downclocked. Yeah, Slot 1 was a very stupid idea. Fortunately, Slot 1 died out really fast with the intro of Socket 370 and PC133 memory. Not too many Slot 1 boards were made to handle the PC133 Slot 1 CPUs. Slotkets suck almost as badly as Slot 1 itself... Ben Myers IMO, Slotkets suck worse than the slot 1 itself. They have a tendency to come unseated. At least the true slots stay put once wrangled into place. On 9 Mar 2007 18:54:41 -0800, " wrote: On Mar 9, 6:44 pm, Ben Myers wrote: Good memory there. This is the generation of computers I deal with daily. My memory is pretty fresh on these. From the standpoint of software drivers, all the SFF computers with the 810e chipset are the same, regardless of CPU. It is also possible to upgrade the later models to a 1GHz Pentium 3 or a 1.1GHz Celeron, either one operating in the 1.65v -1.7v range... Ben Myers I've never seen a 450mhz in a socket. All I've ever seen in that speed is slots. I think it's possible to go faster, since the 450mhz is almost the slowest p3 ever made. But slots require a bit of force to pull in and out, so I don't like swapping them out if I don't have to. Slots are made up to 1ghz (maybe a tad more), but they're very rare above 650mhz or so. And the slotkets are pretty evil, they often don't seat properly. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | [email protected] | General | 3 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | Michael Brown | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | September 27th 04 05:40 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | [email protected] | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | September 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | September 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Why 2200+ & 2800+ in both model 8 & model 10 Sempron? | [email protected] | General | 0 | September 14th 04 12:46 AM |