If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"David Maynard" wrote in message ... Invisible Dance wrote: "The whole nine yards"; the belt length for a full load-out in a .50 caliber machine gun in, I think, a Thunderbolt F-47. That's certainly one of the "where dat come from?" phrases, and being a WWII aircraft fan I kind of like the ammo belt imagery (although I usually hear it as the belt length for a Supermarine Spitfire), but if you do a google search for "the whole nine yards origin" you'll find it's by no means definitive. Cement truck capacity, a football sarcasm (since modified to mean the converse) that "the whole nine yards" DOESN'T 'get you there' (boy, that fellah sure went the whole nine yards. uh huh), burial shroud size, grave depth, and amount of cloth for a full 3 piece suit are some other common suggestions but they all have 'problems'. This page http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/19981012.html isn't an authority but it does accurately sum up what such a search will reveal: So we're afraid that the current Internet verdict on the origin of "the whole nine yards" is a resounding "Who knows?" That one is additionally interesting because it's a rather recent phrase with the earliest known usage being in the 1960s, perhaps the 50's, so it's strange that it's origin was lost so quickly. The best explanation I've found on this one is simpler than any of these -- a sports commentator's enthusiastic comment on a long jump competition. In the late 50's, early 60's, that's about right for distance too. Having heard Rob Beamon use the expression before it became common (although in a different context) also leads credibility to it. Regards, -- *Art |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Medlin wrote:
"David Maynard" wrote in message ... Ed Medlin wrote: Overclocking PCs is very much in the same vain. Freudian slip? LOL.........David, David.............hehehe......I missed that completely.... Ed little snippin' Oh, and the expression "it's so cold it could freeze the balls off a brass monkey" has nothing to do with primates, either living, dead, OR made of brass, nor any male private parts, hehe, but, well, sorry for getting carried away (I wonder where that one came from). I just find the disconnect between understanding them and knowing why to be interesting. LOL......I was not the OP of the vain/vein slip, but usually catch those.....:-) The brass monkey was an inlaid brass plate with concaves to stack cannon balls on old warships. When it got cold, the plates and cannon balls would contract and sometimes fall off. Thus, freeze the balls off a brass monkey........:-) Ed You got it. It's the different coefficient of expansion that causes that. The brass contracts more so the balls eventually slip off the mount, if it gets cold enough. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Arthur Hagen wrote:
"David Maynard" wrote in message ... Invisible Dance wrote: "The whole nine yards"; the belt length for a full load-out in a .50 caliber machine gun in, I think, a Thunderbolt F-47. That's certainly one of the "where dat come from?" phrases, and being a WWII aircraft fan I kind of like the ammo belt imagery (although I usually hear it as the belt length for a Supermarine Spitfire), but if you do a google search for "the whole nine yards origin" you'll find it's by no means definitive. Cement truck capacity, a football sarcasm (since modified to mean the converse) that "the whole nine yards" DOESN'T 'get you there' (boy, that fellah sure went the whole nine yards. uh huh), burial shroud size, grave depth, and amount of cloth for a full 3 piece suit are some other common suggestions but they all have 'problems'. This page http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/19981012.html isn't an authority but it does accurately sum up what such a search will reveal: So we're afraid that the current Internet verdict on the origin of "the whole nine yards" is a resounding "Who knows?" That one is additionally interesting because it's a rather recent phrase with the earliest known usage being in the 1960s, perhaps the 50's, so it's strange that it's origin was lost so quickly. The best explanation I've found on this one is simpler than any of these -- a sports commentator's enthusiastic comment on a long jump competition. In the late 50's, early 60's, that's about right for distance too. Having heard Rob Beamon use the expression before it became common (although in a different context) also leads credibility to it. Regards, Interesting. You mean as in "he jumped the whole nine yards?" I hadn't heard that one but it makes as much sense as most of the others. As I was posting another of the 'whole thing' phrases, I.E. "the whole shebang," it occurred to me that those with "whole" in them kind of cheat on the aspect of knowing what they mean but not why as they include the obvious clue "whole" so that the rest of the phrase becomes rather irrelevant. e.g. The whole enchilada, the whole shebang, the whole nine yards, the whole kit and caboodle, the whole insert whatever sounds cool. I think I'm going to make myself a separate category of 'obvious' but unknown source as opposed to the more interesting 'really' unknown why it means that; like "lock, stock, and barrel" meaning the same 'whole thing' but without the clue "whole.") Crackerjack fun, eh? |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:16:43 -0500, David Maynard
wrote:: hehe. I noticed the spelling because you happened to hit on a phrase that fits into a part time hobby of mine: phrases we 'understand' without knowing exactly why because we've forgotten, or don't think about, where they came from. Like "lock, stock, and barrel"... which comes from ye olde gun days when if you had a 'lock' (e.g. matchlock), and a stock, and a barrel then you had an entire gun: I.E. 'the whole thing', as we use it today. How about this one? You'll never think of this phrase quite the same. "Rule of Thumb" A legal guideline from an bygone era where a man had the right to beat his wife. All too often, women were getting beaten to death so a law was enacted in some jurisdictions. Specifically, that a man could not beat his wife with anything thicker than the width of his thumb. Pretty sick, huh? A sociology prof passed that little tidbit to us when discussing social mores and how they can change over time. I don't use that phrase nearly as often anymore. ---------------------------------------- Thanks, MCheu |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
mcheu wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:16:43 -0500, David Maynard wrote:: hehe. I noticed the spelling because you happened to hit on a phrase that fits into a part time hobby of mine: phrases we 'understand' without knowing exactly why because we've forgotten, or don't think about, where they came from. Like "lock, stock, and barrel"... which comes from ye olde gun days when if you had a 'lock' (e.g. matchlock), and a stock, and a barrel then you had an entire gun: I.E. 'the whole thing', as we use it today. How about this one? You'll never think of this phrase quite the same. "Rule of Thumb" A legal guideline from an bygone era where a man had the right to beat his wife. All too often, women were getting beaten to death so a law was enacted in some jurisdictions. Specifically, that a man could not beat his wife with anything thicker than the width of his thumb. Pretty sick, huh? A sociology prof passed that little tidbit to us when discussing social mores and how they can change over time. I don't use that phrase nearly as often anymore. ---------------------------------------- Thanks, MCheu Your sociology professor seems to have fallen victim to another phrase origins myth, which seems to have cropped up in the mid 70's or so (your sociology professor can probably guess why at that time). While there are some legal references to measuring against the "thumb," like your professor says, that is not the origin of the phrase "rule of thumb," which comes from carpentry, and/or perhaps other fields of measurement (the exact first use origin isn't precisely known), and meant about what you'd guess: that the thumb was used as a ruler (measurement): the "rule of thumb" and there are similar references to using the thumb as a measurement in other languages. For example, in Swedish, the word for inch is "tum" originating from "tumme:" thumb. Not surprising when one realizes that the original length of an inch was from thumb tip to first knuckle: an imminently logical definition since everyone was already using "rule of thumb." (alternate inch measurements were the length of three barley grains placed end to end and distance from first to second knuckle on index finger.) Face it, most early measurement systems used various body parts: foot (rather obvious), yard: Distance from tip of nose to end of thumb with arm outstretched, fathom: From the Anglo-Saxon word for "embrace," it was the length of rope held between two hands with the arms outstretched, HAND: Width of one hand, including the thumb (height of horses), etc. The phrase predates any legal reference by centuries, so you can use it sans the guilt now although sites on 'sensitivities' suggest you be careful lest you offend someone who still believes the myth. For your own research try a google search with "rule of thumb origin." While we're on measurements, and myths, that reminds me of numbers in general and, in particular, 12 because it crops up in so many places. And in so many places that folks try to figure out what the heck was so 'significant' about 12; coming up with all sorts of wild theories including the spiritual and mystical. It's not all that mysterious when you think back on the times and the people, who were uneducated in general and about fractions in particular. 12 is evenly divisible by 1 (trivial case), 2, 3, AND 4! WOW! Do things in base 12 and you can evenly divide amongst the most common occurrences: half for you, half for me and it works for 3 people AND 4 too. 12 eggs to the dozen. 12 inches to the foot. 12 hours in a half day (2 halves for a full). It makes imminent sense. Oh, and since 12 minutes in an hour would make them just too darn big, what should we do? How about adding "5" to the division list to keep things simple for the simple folk? 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 = 60. Might as well use that for seconds too. See, the decimal system only makes sense for the mathematically inclined. I mean, instead of 'quarter past the hour' (it being divisible by 4) how'd you like to be stuck with 0.208333... past the hour (if they hadn't used a base 12 system)? |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Your sociology professor seems to have fallen victim to another phrase
origins myth, which seems to have cropped up in the mid 70's or so (your sociology professor can probably guess why at that time). While there are some legal references to measuring against the "thumb," like your professor says, that is not the origin of the phrase "rule of thumb," which comes from carpentry, and/or perhaps other fields of measurement (the exact first use origin isn't precisely known), and meant about what you'd guess: that the thumb was used as a ruler (measurement): the "rule of thumb" and there are similar references to using the thumb as a measurement in other languages. For example, in Swedish, the word for inch is "tum" originating from "tumme:" thumb. Not surprising when one realizes that the original length of an inch was from thumb tip to first knuckle: an imminently logical definition since everyone was already using "rule of thumb." (alternate inch measurements were the length of three barley grains placed end to end and distance from first to second knuckle on index finger.) Face it, most early measurement systems used various body parts: foot (rather obvious), yard: Distance from tip of nose to end of thumb with arm outstretched, fathom: From the Anglo-Saxon word for "embrace," it was the length of rope held between two hands with the arms outstretched, HAND: Width of one hand, including the thumb (height of horses), etc. The phrase predates any legal reference by centuries, so you can use it sans the guilt now although sites on 'sensitivities' suggest you be careful lest you offend someone who still believes the myth. For your own research try a google search with "rule of thumb origin." While we're on measurements, and myths, that reminds me of numbers in general and, in particular, 12 because it crops up in so many places. And in so many places that folks try to figure out what the heck was so 'significant' about 12; coming up with all sorts of wild theories including the spiritual and mystical. It's not all that mysterious when you think back on the times and the people, who were uneducated in general and about fractions in particular. 12 is evenly divisible by 1 (trivial case), 2, 3, AND 4! WOW! Do things in base 12 and you can evenly divide amongst the most common occurrences: half for you, half for me and it works for 3 people AND 4 too. 12 eggs to the dozen. 12 inches to the foot. 12 hours in a half day (2 halves for a full). It makes imminent sense. Oh, and since 12 minutes in an hour would make them just too darn big, what should we do? How about adding "5" to the division list to keep things simple for the simple folk? 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 = 60. Might as well use that for seconds too. See, the decimal system only makes sense for the mathematically inclined. I mean, instead of 'quarter past the hour' (it being divisible by 4) how'd you like to be stuck with 0.208333... past the hour (if they hadn't used a base 12 system)? Good stuff. These little clichés are a favorite obsession of mine. My wife often accuses me of remembering everything except things that really mean something......:-) (i.e. mowing the yard etc.). I have never really thought about the 12 thing. Now I know something else to PO the wifey.......:-) Ed |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Medlin wrote:
Your sociology professor seems to have fallen victim to another phrase =20 origins =20 myth, which seems to have cropped up in the mid 70's or so (your sociol= ogy professor can probably guess why at that time). While there are some le= gal references to measuring against the "thumb," like your professor says, =20 that is =20 not the origin of the phrase "rule of thumb," which comes from carpentr= y, =20 and/or =20 perhaps other fields of measurement (the exact first use origin isn't =20 precisely =20 known), and meant about what you'd guess: that the thumb was used as a =20 ruler =20 (measurement): the "rule of thumb" and there are similar references to =20 using the =20 thumb as a measurement in other languages. For example, in Swedish, the= =20 word for =20 inch is "tum" originating from "tumme:" thumb. Not surprising when one =20 realizes =20 that the original length of an inch was from thumb tip to first knuckle= : =20 an =20 imminently logical definition since everyone was already using "rule of= =20 thumb." =20 (alternate inch measurements were the length of three barley grains pla= ced =20 end =20 to end and distance from first to second knuckle on index finger.) Face= =20 it, most =20 early measurement systems used various body parts: foot (rather obvious= ), =20 yard: =20 Distance from tip of nose to end of thumb with arm outstretched, fathom= : =20 From =20 the Anglo-Saxon word for "embrace," it was the length of rope held betw= een =20 two =20 hands with the arms outstretched, HAND: Width of one hand, including th= e =20 thumb =20 (height of horses), etc. The phrase predates any legal reference by centuries, so you can use it= =20 sans the =20 guilt now although sites on 'sensitivities' suggest you be careful lest= =20 you =20 offend someone who still believes the myth. For your own research try a google search with "rule of thumb origin." While we're on measurements, and myths, that reminds me of numbers in =20 general =20 and, in particular, 12 because it crops up in so many places. And in so= =20 many =20 places that folks try to figure out what the heck was so 'significant' =20 about 12; =20 coming up with all sorts of wild theories including the spiritual and =20 mystical. =20 It's not all that mysterious when you think back on the times and the =20 people, =20 who were uneducated in general and about fractions in particular. 12 is= =20 evenly =20 divisible by 1 (trivial case), 2, 3, AND 4! WOW! Do things in base 12 a= nd =20 you =20 can evenly divide amongst the most common occurrences: half for you, ha= lf =20 for me =20 and it works for 3 people AND 4 too. 12 eggs to the dozen. 12 inches to= =20 the =20 foot. 12 hours in a half day (2 halves for a full). It makes imminent =20 sense. =20 Oh, and since 12 minutes in an hour would make them just too darn big, =20 what =20 should we do? How about adding "5" to the division list to keep things =20 simple =20 for the simple folk? 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 =3D 60. Might as well use that for =20 seconds too. =20 See, the decimal system only makes sense for the mathematically incline= d. =20 I =20 mean, instead of 'quarter past the hour' (it being divisible by 4) how'= d =20 you =20 like to be stuck with 0.208333... past the hour (if they hadn't used a =20 base 12 =20 system)? =20 Good stuff. These little clich=E9s are a favorite obsession of mine= =2E My wife often accuses me of remembering everything except things that real= ly mean something......:-) (i.e. mowing the yard etc.). I have never reall= y thought about the 12 thing. Now I know something else to PO the wifey.......:-) Hehe. The internet is a great source for useless information g. Although, as the saying goes, one man's trash is another man's treasure ;= ) The bit about "12" has application in looking at how one culture tries to= =20 'interpret' another when the perspective is so different (a consideration= of=20 "deductive reasoning"). In a similar vein, there was quite a hubbub a few= years=20 back about the 'discovery' that Pi showed up in all the pyramid measureme= nts,=20 but the Egyptians knew nothing of Pi! Oh my! Proof of alien influence? (o= ne of=20 the actual suggestions to explain it). As it turns out they used a measuring wheel to lay out the construction=20 dimensions and a wheel will, quite naturally, have Pi as an inherent fact= or=20 simply because it's a wheel. No 'knowledge' of it required. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
For example, overclocking the old slot-1 celeron 300 involved taping a
pin so the motherboard was 'fooled' into thinking it wanted to run on the 100 MHz FSB, which took it from 300 MHz to 450. Taping, or jumpering, other pins could increase the CPU voltage. Then Abit, and others, added BIOS features to set those via the keyboard and everyone could do it. Those same pin modifying techniques can work on any motherboard if it has the FSB capability and the right processor. for overclocking my first PC 286 i have to exchange the quartz i solder a 12Mhz into place from a 8Mhz. and my 486 / 33Mhz to 42Mhz by soldering a new quartz to get my wipeOut 1 game running smoth. good old times |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD overclocking and semperon 3100s | [email protected] | General | 0 | November 24th 04 12:02 PM |
6800 Ultra overclocking - XFX? PNY? eVGA? BFG? | Marc Brown | General | 2 | September 29th 04 04:50 PM |
Looking for some medium-to-extreme overclocking advice | Cyde Weys | General | 4 | July 2nd 04 04:03 AM |
First Time Overclocking Results | uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse | Overclocking | 3 | August 30th 03 02:36 PM |
OverClocking Guides | Phil Weldon | Overclocking | 0 | August 15th 03 05:41 AM |