If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
I'm looking for a 250 W PSU 80+ micro-ATX in Europe and I have trouble
to find one. Dell sells some Desktop PC with PSU of this type, but I'm building a PC myself and so I need it alone. Does someone has some hints? Best regards to everyone and thanks to replying people, Andrea |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/300W-...1-FSP300-60GLS
http://www.watt-power.co.uk/catalogu...oup-p-177.html On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:40:59 +0100, twistedbrain wrote: I'm looking for a 250 W PSU 80+ micro-ATX in Europe and I have trouble to find one. Dell sells some Desktop PC with PSU of this type, but I'm building a PC myself and so I need it alone. Does someone has some hints? Best regards to everyone and thanks to replying people, Andrea |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
Andy and Steve, thank you ... but ;-)
they are 300 W, it is about 20% more than the desired. I'm not obsessed by 250 (also 240, 255, 235 or 260 do work :-). The point is that this Tom's hardware article http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...cy,2069-5.html I found very interesting, demonstrates that a PSU really well sized (in such case 220 W) gives a power saving of some tens percents, because the PSU works at a load level where it yelds really much and better. My system will be a bit energy hungrier than such of the article; it is my CPU will be the E7500 (2,93 Ghz) instead of the E7200 (2,53 Ghz), I'll have 2 hard disks (but green, it is WD SATA 500GB 32Mb cache), and then also 4 GB of RAM and a DVD writer, so, instead of a 220 W PSU a 250 should work right, but a 300 will be at least a bit oversized and so overconsuming. Regards and thanks again, Andrea |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
In article , says...
Andy and Steve, thank you ... but ;-) they are 300 W, it is about 20% more than the desired. I'm not obsessed by 250 (also 240, 255, 235 or 260 do work :-). The point is that this Tom's hardware article http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...cy,2069-5.html I found very interesting, demonstrates that a PSU really well sized (in such case 220 W) gives a power saving of some tens percents, because the PSU works at a load level where it yelds really much and better. My system will be a bit energy hungrier than such of the article; it is my CPU will be the E7500 (2,93 Ghz) instead of the E7200 (2,53 Ghz), I'll have 2 hard disks (but green, it is WD SATA 500GB 32Mb cache), and then also 4 GB of RAM and a DVD writer, so, instead of a 220 W PSU a 250 should work right, but a 300 will be at least a bit oversized and so overconsuming. Regards and thanks again, Andrea 300W rating was the smallest I found with 80+ certification. Do report back if you happen to find 250W P/S that are 80+ certified and available for sale. s |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
Steve ha scritto:
In article , says... Andy and Steve, thank you ... but ;-) they are 300 W, it is about 20% more than the desired. I'm not obsessed by 250 (also 240, 255, 235 or 260 do work :-). The point is that this Tom's hardware article http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...cy,2069-5.html I found very interesting, demonstrates that a PSU really well sized (in such case 220 W) gives a power saving of some tens percents, because the PSU works at a load level where it yelds really much and better. My system will be a bit energy hungrier than such of the article; it is my CPU will be the E7500 (2,93 Ghz) instead of the E7200 (2,53 Ghz), I'll have 2 hard disks (but green, it is WD SATA 500GB 32Mb cache), and then also 4 GB of RAM and a DVD writer, so, instead of a 220 W PSU a 250 should work right, but a 300 will be at least a bit oversized and so overconsuming. Regards and thanks again, Andrea 300W rating was the smallest I found with 80+ certification. Do report back if you happen to find 250W P/S that are 80+ certified and available for sale. The problem is "available for sale"; it is b.e. Dell uses in some of its Desktop, 80+ (or better) PSUs. I don't understand why they are so difficult to find because, if you use the PC many hours a day, b.e. in office context, then in few years you can get back the money you spent to buy them or more because the difference is not so big (from about 30$ to about $50) and you are environment friendly. I've found this one, Seasonic SS-250SU, but I fear that it can't match with my micro ATX mobo, now I'll check and then if it doesn't work I'll go for a 300 W (I've found one for sale, new also here in Italy). I'd like also if it can be quiet. Regards and thanks again |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
twistedbrain ha scritto:
Steve ha scritto: In article , says... Andy and Steve, thank you ... but ;-) they are 300 W, it is about 20% more than the desired. I'm not obsessed by 250 (also 240, 255, 235 or 260 do work :-). The point is that this Tom's hardware article http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...cy,2069-5.html I found very interesting, demonstrates that a PSU really well sized (in such case 220 W) gives a power saving of some tens percents, because the PSU works at a load level where it yelds really much and better. My system will be a bit energy hungrier than such of the article; it is my CPU will be the E7500 (2,93 Ghz) instead of the E7200 (2,53 Ghz), I'll have 2 hard disks (but green, it is WD SATA 500GB 32Mb cache), and then also 4 GB of RAM and a DVD writer, so, instead of a 220 W PSU a 250 should work right, but a 300 will be at least a bit oversized and so overconsuming. Regards and thanks again, Andrea 300W rating was the smallest I found with 80+ certification. Do report back if you happen to find 250W P/S that are 80+ certified and available for sale. The problem is "available for sale"; it is b.e. Dell uses in some of its Desktop, 80+ (or better) PSUs. I don't understand why they are so difficult to find because, if you use the PC many hours a day, b.e. in office context, then in few years you can get back the money you spent to buy them or more because the difference is not so big (from about 30$ to about $50) and you are environment friendly. I've found this one, Seasonic SS-250SU, but I fear that it can't match with my micro ATX mobo, now I'll check and then if it doesn't work I'll go for a 300 W (I've found one for sale, new also here in Italy). I'd like also if it can be quiet. Regards and thanks again I think I was wrong, if I understand well it is "up to 80%", so it's not 80+. Then I saw also that less powerfull is the PSU more quickly turns its fan when the power required grows because it become hotter and so more noisy. I'm wondering if are there fanless PSUs, 80+, 240-260 W and I'm almost sure that there aren't. regards |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
Hello world!
Well, after many Internet search I've found two 300 W PSU 80+ (one ATX, the other micro ATX) that I can get here where I live without customs taxes and in short times. They are the Seasonic SS-300SFD Micro ATX, that I can get all included for about 64 EUR and the Thermaltake TR2 QFan 300W that I can get at about 54 EUR. The micro ATX case I choose should support both (micro ATX and ATX). What would you sugggest and why? Thanks to replying people, regards to all, Andrea |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
twistedbrain wrote:
Paul thank You, The Seasonic is fixed 220VAC input. As long as that is what you're looking for, the specs look great. They look better than any other microATX I was looking at yesterday. Active PFC works against efficiency, but is mandated for operation in Europe. I have to say that I know about nothing about that, so what I'm going to write could be fully wrong, but I report only things (maybe false or misunderstood) I read, it is, I read that Active PFC enhance efficiency in some different places and (but it's unrelated - I think) I saw that 220 vattage instead of 110 could be good for efficiency because in a comparartive table of most efficient PSU there were more model at 220 than at 110 and at 220 was given also the category of Platinum 80 (also if it was empty). Anyway this last consideration about vattage is absolutely unsure and unerliable, insead, about Active PFC I read that in some different and also normally reliable places like Anandtech. Active PFC helps the power company. It may cost the user a small amount of efficiency. I don't think it is completely neutral in terms of its effects on the user's power bill. The power supply still meets its stated efficiency. My comment was more about the conflicting nature of PFC - active power factor correction helps the power company, but may not always work in the favor of the end user. If you look at the power supplies sold in North America, there isn't the same emphasis on PFC, and I don't think any of the supplies I own, have PFC. There could be a difference between efficiency at 110 versus 220 volts. But in the case of the Seasonic, that particular one only operates at 220 volts. I mentioned that, so that you'd check to see whether your power source is 220V or not. If you're in a country using 110V, then that particular Seasonic could not be used. If you have room in the computer case for a regular sized ATX supply, there are supplies with a higher efficiency than 80%. This model, for example, claim 87%. It appears to use a DC-DC converter, to convert 12V to 3.3V and 5V. So the main part of the supply is just a 12V circuit. It means the path to 3.3V and 5V, goes through two conversion steps. http://www.seasonicusa.com/X.htm AC ---- DC --+----------12V | +----DC----3.3V/5V Scroll down, and look at the test results carefully. This new design works best, if there is minimal 3.3V/5V loading. So for computers that draw most of their power from 12V, the supply gets around 90% efficiency. If you heavily load the 3.3V and 5V rails, the efficiency drops to 85%. You could see very good results here, as long as the motherboard doesn't need too much to run the chipset and peripheral chips. Of course, you need room in your computer case to fit this. You may want to verify the dimensions, and see how well it fits your computer case. http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php...print&reid=169 3.3V @ 1A, 5V @ 1A, 12V @ 10A, 23C temp 90.5% efficient 3.3V @ 14A, 5V @ 14A, 12V @ 1A, 29C temp 87.5% efficient 3.3V @ 14A, 5V @ 14A, 12V @ 1A, 35C temp 85.0% efficient So you can get some fairly good numbers, if price is no object. The price here is $180 USD. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817151088 Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
250W 80+ PSU micro-ATX in Europe
In article , says...
Hello world! Well, after many Internet search I've found two 300 W PSU 80+ (one ATX, the other micro ATX) that I can get here where I live without customs taxes and in short times. They are the Seasonic SS-300SFD Micro ATX, that I can get all included for about 64 EUR and the Thermaltake TR2 QFan 300W that I can get at about 54 EUR. The micro ATX case I choose should support both (micro ATX and ATX). What would you sugggest and why? Thanks to replying people, regards to all, Andrea If your case can take an ATX size P/S you might want to look at a SeaSonic S12II 330 Bronze 330W ATX12V v2.3 80 PLUS BRONZE Certified Active PFC Power Supply - Retail Energy Star 5.0 Ready http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817151073 s |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Generic 250W PS enough for this?!? | Alceryes | General | 7 | November 12th 05 12:04 AM |
250W (max) power supply | egf_repeats | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | October 5th 04 09:12 PM |
Tried my GF4 Ti with Deer 250W PSU... | Larry Roberts | Nvidia Videocards | 10 | April 25th 04 11:13 PM |
GF4 Ti, and 250W PSU | Larry Roberts | Nvidia Videocards | 5 | April 16th 04 01:57 PM |
250W psu... | Streiff | Overclocking AMD Processors | 13 | January 6th 04 09:36 PM |