If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Legato Networker timing paratmer
Hello all,
One simple question,in veritas,there is a parameter MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY,does Legato networker have a function like parameter,what is it? Email answer is preferred. Thanks Victor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Well, Legato uses the following sleeps/timeouts:
1) Configurable in the jukebox: Eject sleep: Define the number of seconds for a jukebox to sleep after an eject operation. Unload sleep: Define the number of seconds for a jukebox to sleep before attempting to unload a given cardridge. Idle device timeout: The number of minutes before an idle device is unmounted (only in shared device environments). 2) Configurabe in the group: Inactivity timeout: The number of minutes of inactivity before the group of saves concludes that a client mashine is (presumably) permanently hung. Rene "Victor Zhang" schrieb im Newsbeitrag om... Hello all, One simple question,in veritas,there is a parameter MEDIA_UNMOUNT_DELAY,does Legato networker have a function like parameter,what is it? Email answer is preferred. Thanks Victor |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rene,
Thanks for your reply. One more question,why is there a need for these delay/sleep setting? Why shouldn't hardware notify software the ending of cartridge ejection,unloading,and other activity? Regards Victor |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
One more question,why is there a need for these delay/sleep setting?
Why shouldn't hardware notify software the ending of cartridge ejection,unloading,and other activity? In fact, hardware does this notification you're talking about via normal scsi-commands (command completion message and status good). As far as I know, software developers decided to add some additional delays only for safety reasons. Guess they've made thousands of test with different hardware and got sporadically errors if they only count on hardware notifications. Additional, hardware notifications are sometimes improper in environments with some forms of caching, and with multiple command buffering. Decreasing those delays should be done very careful, my recommendation is to ask the vendor of your hardware about it. Rene |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rene,
Thank you very much. Regards Victor "Rene Köhnen-Wiesemes" wrote in message ... One more question,why is there a need for these delay/sleep setting? Why shouldn't hardware notify software the ending of cartridge ejection,unloading,and other activity? In fact, hardware does this notification you're talking about via normal scsi-commands (command completion message and status good). As far as I know, software developers decided to add some additional delays only for safety reasons. Guess they've made thousands of test with different hardware and got sporadically errors if they only count on hardware notifications. Additional, hardware notifications are sometimes improper in environments with some forms of caching, and with multiple command buffering. Decreasing those delays should be done very careful, my recommendation is to ask the vendor of your hardware about it. Rene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Memory Timing Question | Si | Gigabyte Motherboards | 14 | February 9th 05 09:43 AM |
Legato Networker : Mistake labelisation action on a media not writeprotect | pmalherbe | Storage & Hardrives | 1 | November 7th 03 10:52 AM |
Complex Legato Networker Problem with AIX4.3.3 and L700e | [email protected] | Storage & Hardrives | 2 | September 24th 03 08:39 PM |
is 222 1t timing much better than 333 2t | ali yousefi | General | 5 | July 28th 03 10:07 AM |
Memory timing | Thomas Andersson | Overclocking AMD Processors | 2 | June 28th 03 03:56 AM |