Canon LiDE 25 & LiDE 70

My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

Standalone scanners have come down in price because so many folks have
switched to All in One printers. Personally I prefer the standalones and
have had no problems with my LiDE80.
--
Cari (MS-MVP)
Windows Technologies - Printing & Imaging
http://www.coribright.com/windows

"Talal Itani" wrote in message
news:CKMWh.5823$Fs6.1211@trnddc03...

My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document.
These Canon scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why
are they so inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:15:14 GMT, "Talal Itani"
wrote:


My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

Pay a little more and shorten the time of making a scan.

On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77, Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can jewelry
be scanned with a scanner?

"Talal Itani" wrote in message
newsDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.

--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--

"CSM1" wrote in message
...
"Talal Itani" wrote in message
newsDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since I
have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they
so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.


This is very interesting. If the jewelry is flat, like a coin, I can see
how it can be scanned. But, what about rings, bracelets, can they also be
scanned with a flatbed?

"Talal Itani" wrote in message
news:l3tXh.3332$nR1.2671@trnddc06...

"CSM1" wrote in message
...
"Talal Itani" wrote in message
newsDmXh.9830$no.4774@trnddc02...

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Apr 23, 3:15 am, "Talal Itani" wrote:
My old HP scanner finally quit all the way. So I went to Newegg, and
I
found two really inexpensive scanners: Canon LiDE 25 is for $44.77,
Canon
LiDE 70 is for $89.88. I will not be scanning any photographs, since
I have
a digital camera. Yet every once in a while I scan a document. These
Canon
scanners seem to have good reviews. Yet I am wondering, why are they
so
inexpensive? What do I lose? Thank you.

Talal Itani

The only problem with LiDE's is that by nature they have very limited
depth of field, and are pretty much useless for scanning anything
other than flat paper. If you want to scan jewelry or other small 3d
objects, get another type of scanner.


I will only scan black and white text documents. Even with that I am
worried, $44.77 is an amazing price for a scanner. By the way, can
jewelry be scanned with a scanner?

Absolutely, if the scanner's sensor is a CCD type.
Just look at jewelry on Ebay.

A lot of the jewelry is from a scanner. Some are from a digital camera.


This is very interesting. If the jewelry is flat, like a coin, I can see
how it can be scanned. But, what about rings, bracelets, can they also be
scanned with a flatbed?




Yes, them too.

A CCD sensor had a fair amount of Depth of Field, and focuses up to about an
inch of so from the top of the Platen.

How far the focus extends is specific to the scanner.
My Canon Canoscan 8400F goes to about 1/2 inch above the platen.

--
CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--