If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
I am loking for a ballpark costof a storage system to handle about 60
Terabytes of data. Can someone give me a rough hardware cost of this? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
OK, I guess I deserved that. Basically we are about to give birth to a
60 terabyte xml repository that an application needs access to. I assume a SAN but I am clueless in this area and need to give a very rough estimate of how much the storage solution will cost. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
60 terabytes
In article .com,
wrote: OK, I guess I deserved that. Basically we are about to give birth to a 60 terabyte xml repository that an application needs access to. I assume a SAN but I am clueless in this area and need to give a very rough estimate of how much the storage solution will cost. The cost per gigabyte is between $0.50/GB for raw SATA disk sold wholesale, and $25/GB for high-end fiber-channel attached disk arrays using fast SCSI disks. For SATA disk you can about triple that to go from the raw disk to disks in enclosures with power supplies. For the disk arrays, you can quadruple the value, if you want RAID-10 mirroring locally, and remote mirroring to a desaster recovery site. So the range of $1.50/GB to $100/GB makes the cost of your system about $90K to $6M. For the high-end solution, you'll need to add SAN, power and cooling infrastructure, bringing the cost up by another few million. The huge difference in price reflects a huge range in capabilities. Which leads to the real interesting question: - Can you precompress the data? If Paul 10:1 compression is a good guess, you are down to 6TB, which can be handled by 12 SATA disks in a single enclosure, using 2 or 3 PCI-connected SATA RAID cards. - How many hosts is this storage system attached to? I would be very surprised if 60TB are being used by a single computer. - If the number of hosts is greater than one, how will the data be shared or distributed among hosts? - What read/write bandwidth do you need? Are accesses random or sequential (storage systems speed changes by several orders of magnitude depending on access pattern)? - How valuable is your data? Do you need it backed up? How are you going to back up this much data? Does it change frequently? - How vital is the data to your operation, and do you need continuous access? If yes, you positively need RAID. With this much data, I would RAID even if you can afford to lose the data for days at a time, just to minimize the management cost. If you also need to be tolerant to site failures, you need remote replication (to a second set of storage systems in a remote computer center). Once you have the answers to these questions, the choice of SAN fabric and storage device is pretty much trivial. Suggestion: look for a big vendor (typically 2-3 letter names), or a consultant/system integrator, to give you some advice. -- The address in the header is invalid for obvious reasons. Please reconstruct the address from the information below (look for _). Ralph Becker-Szendy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
60 terabytes | [email protected] | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | February 13th 06 11:02 PM |
The Terabyte Hard Drive is Here (1 Terabyte=1,000 GB; What's the Limit? Terabytes, Petabytes, Exabytes?) | [email protected] | Storage (alternative) | 49 | November 9th 05 05:20 AM |
31 Terabytes of storage? | Terry Wilson | Homebuilt PC's | 10 | August 5th 04 10:10 PM |
SCSI is limited to 2 terabytes | Maurice Volaski | Storage & Hardrives | 24 | May 28th 04 01:04 AM |
PC Server up to 2 terabytes storage? | Rich | Homebuilt PC's | 8 | April 5th 04 12:27 PM |