If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cooling a P4 Prescott
"Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Is this at default speed, overclocked, with the standard Intel heatsink, with something else? I'm also planning to install some extra fans in the case to get the hot air out. Just now it's sitting at 40C in the case. That's way too hot. If you pay attention to this aspect before splashing out on a new heatsink, you will find that your existing thermal solution, whatever it is, will work far more effectively, as will whatever you buy to replace it - if indeed you still need a replacement. what are the benefits of using 'heat pipe' technology? Put very simply, heat pipes are a method of "pumping" heat away from its source to the cooling portion of the heatsink via a phase change (liquid to vapour and back to liquid) process. The sealed pipes contain a fluid that evaporates at the base of the sink due to heat from the CPU. It then rises to the top of the pipe, carrying the heat with it, and gradually condensing back to liquid as it goes, thus trickling back to the bottom of the heatsink where the process starts again. One of the points to make about heat pipe heatsinks is that they are normally designed to work best on a horizontally mounted motherboard, and their effectiveness is often compromised when mounted sideways in a tower case. The Thermalright TOWER112 (http://tinyurl.com/4tmtu). This is made by Thermaltake, not Thermalright, and is also a heat pipe heatsink, and works very well. Probably worth pointing out though that the CoolerMaster Hyper 6 is a very similar design, but benefits from a better fitting kit and a better standard of finish to its CPU mating face. If you're prepared to do a little work, the Thermaltake product works just as well as the CoolerMaster. Out of the box though the CM product is a little better. One thing to point out about both these designs is that they are both physically very large and very heavy. If you're going to mount in a tower system, you really need to bolt their mounts through to the case via standoffs to take the stress off the motherboard. Or the ZALMAN CNPS7000A (http://tinyurl.com/2nacv). This is a good, quiet heatsink, but isn't as effective as the heatpipe designs mentioned above. Does anyone have any recomendations about these or any others I should consider? In terms of sheer effectiveness, multi-heatpipe sinks like the Thermaltake Tower and CoolerMaster Hyper 6 are about the state of the art at this time, but their mounting requirements should make you think carefully - ideally they need to be used on a horizontally mounted motherboard, both for maximum effectiveness and the mechanical integrity of the motherboard. No personal experience of the Thermalright product you mention, but as a smaller, four pipe design it is unlikely to be quite as effective. On the plus side though it is smaller and lighter and so should be easier to mount. Before you buy anything though you should sort out your case cooling. As things stand, any money spent on a new CPU heatsink will be largely wasted due to the fact that its effectiveness will be severely compromised. Forced air heat exchangers rely on the temperature differential between hot and coldside, and a more effective CPU sink will likely make the air in your case even hotter. You need to get your in-case temps down before making any other moves. -- Richard Hopkins Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom (replace .nospam with .com in reply address) The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?)
It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. 1) Ideally you should draw cold air in using a fan at the front bottom of the case. 2) Fans in the back want to extract warmer air out of the rear top of the case. 3)The fan on the front or bottom of the PSU should suck air straight out of the case into the PSU and then out of the PSU via the rear fan on the PSU. 4) You can improvise some ducting (I used cardboard boxes) to make sure that hot air gets blown out of the case directly, rather than washing across other components first. 5) Similarly, you can duct cold fresh air straight into the HSF so that the CPU sees room temperature air only. 6) You case temperature should be similar to your room temperature, maybe upto 5 deg C higher. If the case temperature is significantly higher, it is an indication of poor airflow. RMC, England |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 26 Oct 2004, wrote:
My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. 1) Ideally you should draw cold air in using a fan at the front bottom of the case. 2) Fans in the back want to extract warmer air out of the rear top of the case. 3)The fan on the front or bottom of the PSU should suck air straight out of the case into the PSU and then out of the PSU via the rear fan on the PSU. 4) You can improvise some ducting (I used cardboard boxes) to make sure that hot air gets blown out of the case directly, rather than washing across other components first. 5) Similarly, you can duct cold fresh air straight into the HSF so that the CPU sees room temperature air only. 6) You case temperature should be similar to your room temperature, maybe upto 5 deg C higher. If the case temperature is significantly higher, it is an indication of poor airflow. RMC, England Thanks for the info. I'm planning to buy some new fans in the next week or so for the case. I honestly think the HS isn't sitting right or the fan on it is useless so I'm upgrading that too. -- Alex Devlin "I don't care who you want to speak to, or how far you came, or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Ahh, am I the only one who knows this?? That temp is just fine for a "Prescott" Prescott's have a much hotter overheat temp then most CPU's 93ºC I think, it's not uncommon to see temps hit 73ºC with a Prescott. Every1 that has posted a reply, go do your home work. You'll find it's true. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) (Denny, always with a smile, even if times are bad.) I obviously need to cool it down a lot so I'm looking for the best air cooler. I just can't afford water cooling at the moment. I'm also planning to install some extra fans in the case to get the hot air out. Just now it's sitting at 40C in the case. I've read some info at www.overclockers.com and other sites and have gotten down to three possible coolers. The Thermalright XP-90 (http://tinyurl.com/4lv4m) what are the benefits of using 'heat pipe' technology? The Thermalright TOWER112 (http://tinyurl.com/4tmtu). Or the ZALMAN CNPS7000A (http://tinyurl.com/2nacv). Does anyone have any recomendations about these or any others I should consider? What about web sites that can give me some more info and help me find a solution to getting this system cool? And unfortunately, nitro cooling isn't an option either just now... :-( -- Alex Devlin "I don't care who you want to speak to, how far you came or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE!" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"RavingRaichu" wrote in message
... "Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Ahh, am I the only one who knows this?? That temp is just fine for a "Prescott" Prescott's have a much hotter overheat temp then most CPU's 93ºC I think, it's not uncommon to see temps hit 73ºC with a Prescott. I need to correct myself here, 93ºC is when the cpu goes to glass.. burns out, toast. Again though, the Prescott is one of the hottest cpu's on the market, and I don't meat hot as in good. I mean it runs hotter then anyother cpu I've seem, it's also why I don't have one in my Gigabyte 8IG1000 Pro board. Trying to keep one of those things cool is a loosing battle as long as you don't go to water. http://www.bit-tech.net/review/303/3 http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...212193648.html 89 Watts is a lot of power for just one CPU It's not far from 90 watts. Grab an 80 watt light bulb that's been on for a while. You need to get rid of that much heat to keep it cool. And then some. I read one page that listed the Prescott burning up at like 65ºC Some ppl's Prescott's run at that idle. And 70 or so under load, if that pages was right, there would be a lot of Prescott cpu's that would be pieces of glass. It's also on Intel's pages too, but I cant seem to find it right now. They should make it easier to find,, Grrrrrr. The 3.2 & 3.4 GHz Prescott's use 103W Try to keep that cool. You should've just got a (Northwood) Northwoods run cool, my system is almost idle.. I'd say even without a monitor, which I have none installed. my cpu is running at a temp of about 72 or 73 ºF if any warmer, 74 or 75F I'm not sure what C would be. Snip,, copy paste. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) (Denny, always with a smile, even if times are bad.) "I don't care who you want to speak to, how far you came or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE!" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
I have a P4 Prescott 3.4 ghz (560) sockel 775. My CPU was also very hot, so i put a Watercoolin-System on it, and now i have temperatures about 28 - 30 C. My Northbridge and GPU is also Watercooled. My CPU is running at 4.2 Ghz. Greez alex "RavingRaichu" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "RavingRaichu" wrote in message ... "Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Ahh, am I the only one who knows this?? That temp is just fine for a "Prescott" Prescott's have a much hotter overheat temp then most CPU's 93ºC I think, it's not uncommon to see temps hit 73ºC with a Prescott. I need to correct myself here, 93ºC is when the cpu goes to glass.. burns out, toast. Again though, the Prescott is one of the hottest cpu's on the market, and I don't meat hot as in good. I mean it runs hotter then anyother cpu I've seem, it's also why I don't have one in my Gigabyte 8IG1000 Pro board. Trying to keep one of those things cool is a loosing battle as long as you don't go to water. http://www.bit-tech.net/review/303/3 http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...212193648.html 89 Watts is a lot of power for just one CPU It's not far from 90 watts. Grab an 80 watt light bulb that's been on for a while. You need to get rid of that much heat to keep it cool. And then some. I read one page that listed the Prescott burning up at like 65ºC Some ppl's Prescott's run at that idle. And 70 or so under load, if that pages was right, there would be a lot of Prescott cpu's that would be pieces of glass. It's also on Intel's pages too, but I cant seem to find it right now. They should make it easier to find,, Grrrrrr. The 3.2 & 3.4 GHz Prescott's use 103W Try to keep that cool. You should've just got a (Northwood) Northwoods run cool, my system is almost idle.. I'd say even without a monitor, which I have none installed. my cpu is running at a temp of about 72 or 73 ºF if any warmer, 74 or 75F I'm not sure what C would be. Snip,, copy paste. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) (Denny, always with a smile, even if times are bad.) "I don't care who you want to speak to, how far you came or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE!" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
I have a P4 Prescott 3.4 ghz (560) sockel 775. My CPU was also very hot, so i put a Watercoolin-System on it, and now i have temperatures about 28 - 30 C. My Northbridge and GPU is also Watercooled. My CPU is running at 4.2 Ghz. Greez alex "RavingRaichu" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "RavingRaichu" wrote in message ... "Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Ahh, am I the only one who knows this?? That temp is just fine for a "Prescott" Prescott's have a much hotter overheat temp then most CPU's 93ºC I think, it's not uncommon to see temps hit 73ºC with a Prescott. I need to correct myself here, 93ºC is when the cpu goes to glass.. burns out, toast. Again though, the Prescott is one of the hottest cpu's on the market, and I don't meat hot as in good. I mean it runs hotter then anyother cpu I've seem, it's also why I don't have one in my Gigabyte 8IG1000 Pro board. Trying to keep one of those things cool is a loosing battle as long as you don't go to water. http://www.bit-tech.net/review/303/3 http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...212193648.html 89 Watts is a lot of power for just one CPU It's not far from 90 watts. Grab an 80 watt light bulb that's been on for a while. You need to get rid of that much heat to keep it cool. And then some. I read one page that listed the Prescott burning up at like 65ºC Some ppl's Prescott's run at that idle. And 70 or so under load, if that pages was right, there would be a lot of Prescott cpu's that would be pieces of glass. It's also on Intel's pages too, but I cant seem to find it right now. They should make it easier to find,, Grrrrrr. The 3.2 & 3.4 GHz Prescott's use 103W Try to keep that cool. You should've just got a (Northwood) Northwoods run cool, my system is almost idle.. I'd say even without a monitor, which I have none installed. my cpu is running at a temp of about 72 or 73 ºF if any warmer, 74 or 75F I'm not sure what C would be. Snip,, copy paste. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) (Denny, always with a smile, even if times are bad.) "I don't care who you want to speak to, how far you came or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE!" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Alexander Ferrari" wrote in message
... Hi, I have a P4 Prescott 3.4 ghz (560) sockel 775. My CPU was also very hot, so i put a Watercoolin-System on it, and now i have temperatures about 28 - 30 C. My Northbridge and GPU is also Watercooled. My CPU is running at 4.2 Ghz. You didn't need to post it more then one time. The problem with a 775 Prescott is the fact that you can't use any of it's 64Bit instruction set, @ least not till Microsoft comes out with the Intel Version of WinXp 64 It could be as late as january till they come out with it. This board I use, a socket 478 board can take a Prescott, it's ready with the bios for it.. Gigabyte 8IG1000 Pro, but cause of how hot they get, I don't want one. Plus, if it's not as ready as Gigabyte thinks it is, it can go really hard on some of the parts of the MB, read it a number of times. Here's something that the guy with a 2.8 GHz Prescott should read. http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-208-1.htm "In our first Prescott review, we told you that it was significantly hotter than an equivalent Northwood CPU at 3.2 GHz. It was not unusual to see a fully loaded Prescott to hit up to 80 degrees C (yes, CELSIUS) with stock cooling. This poses no stability issues however. Interestingly, the new 3.4 GHz Prescott features the exact same Thermal Design Power spec as the 3.2, and thus should be no hotter or cooler than the 3.2 GHz version." You can also look up my board from that link, I didn't remember that G -- Gigabyte GA-8IG1000 Pro-G But that is the board I have. A little over 73ºC is normal for your (2.8GHz Prescott) Me hopes the one who started this thread reads this. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) Greez alex "RavingRaichu" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "RavingRaichu" wrote in message ... "Alex Devlin" wrote in message news:mxEed.60422$hj.39791@fed1read07... My 2.8 P4 is running way to hot. (So what's new?) It idles around 48C but goes to 73C+ when working hard. Ahh, am I the only one who knows this?? That temp is just fine for a "Prescott" Prescott's have a much hotter overheat temp then most CPU's 93ºC I think, it's not uncommon to see temps hit 73ºC with a Prescott. I need to correct myself here, 93ºC is when the cpu goes to glass.. burns out, toast. Again though, the Prescott is one of the hottest cpu's on the market, and I don't meat hot as in good. I mean it runs hotter then anyother cpu I've seem, it's also why I don't have one in my Gigabyte 8IG1000 Pro board. Trying to keep one of those things cool is a loosing battle as long as you don't go to water. http://www.bit-tech.net/review/303/3 http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...212193648.html 89 Watts is a lot of power for just one CPU It's not far from 90 watts. Grab an 80 watt light bulb that's been on for a while. You need to get rid of that much heat to keep it cool. And then some. I read one page that listed the Prescott burning up at like 65ºC Some ppl's Prescott's run at that idle. And 70 or so under load, if that pages was right, there would be a lot of Prescott cpu's that would be pieces of glass. It's also on Intel's pages too, but I cant seem to find it right now. They should make it easier to find,, Grrrrrr. The 3.2 & 3.4 GHz Prescott's use 103W Try to keep that cool. You should've just got a (Northwood) Northwoods run cool, my system is almost idle.. I'd say even without a monitor, which I have none installed. my cpu is running at a temp of about 72 or 73 ºF if any warmer, 74 or 75F I'm not sure what C would be. Snip,, copy paste. RavingRaichu. ;-) :-) (Denny, always with a smile, even if times are bad.) "I don't care who you want to speak to, how far you came or what you have to offer. You CAN'T PARK HERE!" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Prescott cooling solution | Cuzman | AMD x86-64 Processors | 1 | December 10th 04 12:48 AM |
Water cooling? Which one? | Silvertip | Overclocking | 0 | August 4th 04 05:29 AM |
Prescott 2.8A 533FSB in 845E chipset Gigabyte 8IE533 | greg | Overclocking | 2 | February 4th 04 01:59 PM |
Watercooling, peltiers etc,.. | Moods | Overclocking | 5 | February 3rd 04 08:41 AM |
Is liquid cooling any good? | James A. Donald | Overclocking | 30 | December 12th 03 12:55 PM |