If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bus Ratio Change does not work
P111/450 . Moving the bus ratio jumpers upward or down does not alter the
displayed speed. System Bus F 100MHz Ratio of Processor Core to System Bus 1.5 to 8 Any suggestions as to why there is no response to the jumper shift appreciated Vic |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
P111/450 . Moving the bus ratio jumpers upward or down does not alter
the displayed speed. System Bus F 100MHz Ratio of Processor Core to System Bus 1.5 to 8 Any suggestions as to why there is no response to the jumper shift appreciated Most processors after the early model Pentium 2 (Intel, anyway) have a locked multiplier. Changing the multiplier on the board (your ratio) will either have no effect or will stop your system from booting (I tried it on a P2 350, on an Asus P2B). If you want a faster processor for no extra money, you have to increase the FSB (your system bus) - and this is where the art comes in. Some processors released now have fully unlocked multipliers (AMD Athlon 64 FX springs to mind) and some have unlocked lower multipliers (you can pick any multiplier lower than your CPU is rated for, but no higher - example is the AMD Athlon 64 series, socket 754 and 939). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"vic" wrote in message...
P111/450 . Moving the bus ratio jumpers upward or down does not alter the displayed speed. Any suggestions as to why there is no response to the jumper shift appreciated Sure, the multiplier is locked on board the CPU at 4.5x, and the only way to alter the CPU core speed is to chage the front side bus. -- Richard Hopkins Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom (replace .nospam with .com in reply address) The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks folks for the quick response. Will have to get my thinking cap on !!
Regards Vic "Richard Hopkins" wrote in message ... "vic" wrote in message... P111/450 . Moving the bus ratio jumpers upward or down does not alter the displayed speed. Any suggestions as to why there is no response to the jumper shift appreciated Sure, the multiplier is locked on board the CPU at 4.5x, and the only way to alter the CPU core speed is to chage the front side bus. -- Richard Hopkins Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom (replace .nospam with .com in reply address) The UK's leading technology reseller www.dabs.com Get the most out of your digital photos www.dabsxpose.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Banand and all.
Please explain "and this is where the art comes in". Is there a way of unlocking settings? I would appreciate knowing this little gem. regards, Vic -- Please remove s from my email address "BananaOfTheNight" wrote in message news:cmqj7h$8g0 If you want a faster processor for no extra money, you have to increase the FSB (your system bus) - and this is where the art comes in. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Please explain "and this is where the art comes in"
The process of overclocking your CPU by raising the FSB is not an exact science (hence the 'art'). There are some factors that you can pin down yourself, like getting memory that is rated to run at high speeds (your FSB is the frequency that your CPU talks to your memory at), keeping the relevant parts of your computer cool (the CPU mainly - as you clock it higher, it will spew out more heat) and keeping the voltages sufficient (some hardware is unstable if clocked too high and with not enough volts. Beware - too many volts will cause expensive meltdown). There are other factors involved too - you need to have a motherboard with a decent chipset that copes well with changes in frequency. I had a board (chipset = SiS 648 Max) that was ridiculously unstable when clocked even 10 MHz above stock (it was a P4 2.4 GHz), but it was a cheapo board anyway. You may also have to loosen the timings on your memory (don't ask me for a good explanation of that - I don't know it in enough detail) to get it to run well at higher frequencies. Aside from those few starting pointers, you have to experiment a bit. Best to have a little look around (usenet, google, whatever) and find out the maximum tolerances for your stuff - the highest temperature that the CPU can cope with, the highest voltage that it can stand, specs and overclocking tests (if people have published their results) for your memory, etc. There is not a simple, one-size-fits-all formula for overclocking - that's why we have a newsgroup and thousands of websites on the topic. Is there a way of unlocking settings? I would appreciate knowing this little gem. Yes, but only if you have an Athlon processor. It is not a trivial task and can kill your CPU if done wrong, but it is possible. Have a look at these: http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20011112/index.html http://www4.tomshardware.com/column/20011124/index.html for overclocking Athlon XP/MP processors (pre-Barton core) There is also some stuff on unlocking Barton-cored Athlons here, but I dont know any other stuff about this: http://www.emboss.co.nz/amdunlock/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thank you BOTN.
Will go away and digest your comments and get back latter Regards Vic -- Please remove s from my email address "BananaOfTheNight" wrote in message ... Please explain "and this is where the art comes in" The process of overclocking your CPU by raising the FSB is not an exact science (hence the 'art'). There are some factors that you can pin down yourself, like getting memory that is rated to run at high speeds (your FSB is the frequency that your CPU talks to your memory at), keeping the relevant parts of your computer cool (the CPU mainly - as you clock it higher, it will spew out more heat) and keeping the voltages sufficient (some hardware is unstable if clocked too high and with not enough volts. Beware - too many volts will cause expensive meltdown). There are other factors involved too - you need to have a motherboard with a decent chipset that copes well with changes in frequency. I had a board (chipset = SiS 648 Max) that was ridiculously unstable when clocked even 10 MHz above stock (it was a P4 2.4 GHz), but it was a cheapo board anyway. You may also have to loosen the timings on your memory (don't ask me for a good explanation of that - I don't know it in enough detail) to get it to run well at higher frequencies. Aside from those few starting pointers, you have to experiment a bit. Best to have a little look around (usenet, google, whatever) and find out the maximum tolerances for your stuff - the highest temperature that the CPU can cope with, the highest voltage that it can stand, specs and overclocking tests (if people have published their results) for your memory, etc. There is not a simple, one-size-fits-all formula for overclocking - that's why we have a newsgroup and thousands of websites on the topic. Is there a way of unlocking settings? I would appreciate knowing this little gem. Yes, but only if you have an Athlon processor. It is not a trivial task and can kill your CPU if done wrong, but it is possible. Have a look at these: http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/20011112/index.html http://www4.tomshardware.com/column/20011124/index.html for overclocking Athlon XP/MP processors (pre-Barton core) There is also some stuff on unlocking Barton-cored Athlons here, but I dont know any other stuff about this: http://www.emboss.co.nz/amdunlock/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Last/Fastest cB0 stepped 'gray zone' Celerons work natively on Abit ZM6/BM6? | pgtr | General | 15 | July 9th 04 07:29 PM |
DELL upgrade with Kingston Value RAM - will it work properly | stromer | General | 0 | January 31st 04 08:29 AM |
Question about flat panel monitor contrast ratio. | Dan | General | 16 | January 16th 04 08:27 PM |
Can't change CPU multiplier Atholn 2600+ | Mark_H | Overclocking | 13 | January 11th 04 04:23 AM |
Can't get two CD drives to work on XP machine | Bruce | General | 2 | September 5th 03 01:01 AM |