If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can't Install Radeon 9600SE Because No Standard VGA Driver in XP
I've searched and searched for this (along with pulling out my hair
trying to figure it out), but I can't find a solution. The problem: I'm trying to install a new Radeon 9600SE in a homebuilt computer. It's a 2.4 GHz P4 on a (rather crappy) ECS P4VXASD2+ motherboard, 512 MB RAM, running XP Home which was installed as of about 2 weeks ago. The video card is a GeForce 2 MX. Following the instructions in the Radeon manual, I updated the VIA 4-in-1 drivers, then uninstalled the GeForce's drivers (they were the most recent drivers on Nvidia's site as of a week ago, but I don't know the version number), then powered down to swap the cards. The Radeon is not recognized as a Standard VGA device, or any variant thereof (e.g., Standard PCI VGA) when XP boots up. It is recognized by XP as two different components, a "Video Controller" and a "Video Controller (VGA Compatible)". The Radeon drivers on the installation disc refuse to install, showing two different dialog boxes. The first says there has been an Inf error. The second states that I need to install a standard VGA driver first. As far as I can tell, this copy of XP has no Standard VGA driver. I can't change to such a driver via the Device Manager. I can't select it through the Add Hardware wizard. I can't get anything to happen. I've tried Safe Mode. I've tried VGA Mode (from the F8 boot menu). I've tried pointing the Add Hardware wizard to the Inf on the ATI CD--this gets me one device recognized as a Radeon 9600SE, but leaves another "Video Controller" and the system becomes grossly unstable and the ATI driver installation still fails with the same Standard VGA driver needed error. (As an aside, I always found it easy to force the Standard VGA driver in Win98, but it just doesn't seem to exist here.) If it helps, the driver that is apparently running these "Video Controller" devices is called vgasave. Also, these devices show up in "Other Devices," not as "Display Adapters." I have not as yet downloaded the Catalyst 3.8 drivers (in large part, because in my Google searches, I found people were encountering the same problem with them, and finding no answer). Two basic questions: Is there a way to install these drivers without having a Standard VGA driver? Is there an .inf file or something somewhere in the Windows directory which is the Standard VGA driver that I could force. A lesser question, born of my frustration, is, Why the hell do the ATI drivers care which generic XP driver is running the device before they are installed? Why is "vgasave" so wrong, compared with this non-existent Standard VGA driver. Thanks for any help. -- Steven Myers The user's email address has automatically been obscured. Send email to smyers at sign sonic dot net. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Geez I just read digtal standard def TV equals 640x480 res - maybe thats why my low res PC captures looked lousy | [email protected] | General | 0 | October 26th 04 07:33 PM |
A7A266 and All in Wonder Radeon | WildRiver | Asus Motherboards | 0 | February 12th 04 01:29 PM |
AIW RADEON : AtiInfo.exe Freezes comp. Can't install any new drivers. | Babbit | Ati Videocards | 9 | November 4th 03 07:44 AM |
ATI Radeon Newbie Quick Question | jj | Ati Videocards | 3 | September 28th 03 10:16 PM |
Unable to install ATI Radeon 9800 Linux driver v3.2.5 | [email protected] | Ati Videocards | 5 | September 22nd 03 10:38 PM |