If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice
PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? Yousuf Khan That's a good question. The terminology is adjusted, to whatever sells power supplies. That's a rule of thumb about marketing. You don't actually have to be honest about what you're selling. You describe it in any way, that will make you successful. if a competitor touted single rail output, and he's selling supplies, then you chime in with a matching story. These are some examples of power supply designs. AC ---- switcher --- 65A ---- 75A_limiter ----+---- 12V1 | +---- 12V2 | +---- 12V3 OK, let's take a Molex, and short +12V to ground on that one. The whole yellow and black wires on the Molex, start to glow, the plastic melts off the wire, and so on. While this is a "true single rail" design, notice it's a safety hazard. The design could provide around 12*75 = 900W of thermal energy, if you adjusted the loading just right. If the short had a resistance of 0.2 ohms, the supply likely wouldn't shut off. A dead short, might trip it OK. Hard to guess... Now, let's make a design closer to the intentions of the IEC60950 spec, and limit individual outputs to a safer level. This still isn't compliant, but its closer to the spirit of the limitations you're supposed to apply to secondary outputs. AC ---- switcher ----- 65A ---+-- 25A_limiter --------- 12V1 | +-- 25A_limiter --------- 12V2 | +-- 25A_limiter --------- 12V3 Now, the wires may still get hot, the connectors burn, but the amount of power in any individual circuit, cannot exceed 12*25 = 300W. The limiter works, by switching off the supply, if the current flow level is exceeded. An overload in any branch, can switch it off. Power supplies built as follows, are "true independent output" circuits. A hint you're getting the real McCoy, is the chassis is 1" to 1.5" longer than the competing power supply of the same capacity. The density cannot be as great, because of the replicated circuits. I don't think that many, were actually built this way. If you open your Zalman, it probably doesn't match this topology. Your Zalman, might be the previous figure. AC -- DC ---+-- switcher ----- 22A ------ 25A_limiter --- 12V1 300V | +-- switcher ----- 22A ------ 25A_limiter --- 12V2 | +-- switcher ----- 22A ------ 25A_limiter --- 12V2 I'd say that middle design, looks pretty good. No matter whether my marketing department describes it as "one rail" or "multi rail". The size of the supply, or the lack of replicated circuits inside, can help you judge the true topology. I don't own a copy of IEC60950, so I can't copy/paste the appropriate part. And the last time I looked, I couldn't find a copy "floating" on the web. The keyword "SELV" comes to mind, but that's about all I remember now. HTH, Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
Yousuf Khan wrote
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. What signs are those exactly ? That wouldnt normally be the case unless you have one hell of a video card in it. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. And I would be amazed if you are exceeding that. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! And even the biggest is only 1A more than you currently have. Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? So they dont have to have 4 separate 12V regulators. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
On 22/03/2012 8:52 AM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? Yousuf Khan Well get yourself one that has good weight and a three year warranty. Bigger is not necessarily any better and depends on your PC configuration. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
On 21/03/2012 6:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. What signs are those exactly ? Well, we've discussed those on csiphs already, mainly the optical drives sending controller error messages even when they are not being used, and I'm also noticing some occasional spin retry errors on a few of my internal HDD's. That wouldnt normally be the case unless you have one hell of a video card in it. Well, the video card is not a monster of any kind, it's more upper mainstream, an AMD Radeon 6870. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. And I would be amazed if you are exceeding that. Well, I ran my system components through a few power supply calculators: http://extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine said I needed 580W. http://www.thermaltake.outervision.com/Power said I needed 574W. http://support.asus.com/powersupply.aspx said I needed 900W!!! Obviously, the Asus rating is an outlier so I'm ignoring that one, but the other two seem to agree pretty close to each other, and that level is pretty close to the maximum power rating (within 96-97%) of my old PS. And with the age of the PS advancing in years, its maximum capacity might actually be decreasing over time. When I first obtained this 600W PS, the PS calculator showed that my system requirement was only in the upper 400W range. So I thought I had more than enough leeway, but it looks like the various upgrades have quickly taken up most of that leeway since then. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! And even the biggest is only 1A more than you currently have. When you add it up, yes the 4 separate rails come out to about 64A, but the point is is it possible that some of the rails are overloaded by themselves? Would it be easier to distribute the power if there was a single larger rail rather than 4 smaller rails? Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? So they dont have to have 4 separate 12V regulators. I found one possible explanation he http://www.overclock.net/t/88626/inf...iple-12v-rails According to the above, the EU had mandated that no single +12V rail could exceed 20A, and that later Intel also embraced that EU rule, and further reduced that down to 18A. But now it looks like Intel no longer requires the 18A rule. I'm not sure if the EU has also dropped its 20A requirement, but here in North America there is no longer a need to have separate rails anymore, so we can go to single super-rails. Yousuf Khan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:52:28 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? Multi-rail was a cheap way to produce the high power, but it limits the distribution of that power into defined loads, loads that the user would perhaps not be able to judge correctly. Single rail makes distributing the 12V a 'don't care' as far as splitting up the load to suit the power supply. Much simpler, more efficient. Grant. Yousuf Khan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Well, I ran my system components through a few power supply calculators: http://extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine said I needed 580W. http://www.thermaltake.outervision.com/Power said I needed 574W. http://support.asus.com/powersupply.aspx said I needed 900W!!! Obviously, the Asus rating is an outlier so I'm ignoring that one, but the other two seem to agree pretty close to each other, and that level is pretty close to the maximum power rating (within 96-97%) of my old PS. And with the age of the PS advancing in years, its maximum capacity might actually be decreasing over time. When I first obtained this 600W PS, the PS calculator showed that my system requirement was only in the upper 400W range. So I thought I had more than enough leeway, but it looks like the various upgrades have quickly taken up most of that leeway since then. The HD6870 is 124 to 147 watts. One of the cards quoted here could be an overclock. Try doing your power calculation manually. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/gra...u_4.html#sect0 Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
On Mar 22, 7:52*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? * * * * Yousuf Khan Traditionally it was always considered good practice to separate the power for digital and analog circuits as much as possible to prevent interference. This would especially be the case in audio systems. In the case of a PC, this would mean keeping the supply for motors (such as Hard Drives, CD ROMS etc on a separate circuit, so as to minimise any electrical noise from these from interfering with digital circuits - assuming this really is a problem in a modern PC. Usually having separate supply cables from a common power source is sufficient. I would suggest it is more likely done to keep the currents manageable on particular circuits however. You might have 60A available, but in cases like this where one circuit is never going to need more than (say) 15a, it is safer to split it into 4 separate circuits. Exactly the same is done in your home fusebox in having separate fuses and circuits for your lights, power points, air con, water heater, stove etc, rather than just having a single 200A fuse for the entire lot. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
Yousuf Khan wrote
Rod Speed wrote Yousuf Khan wrote I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. What signs are those exactly ? Well, we've discussed those on csiphs already, mainly the optical drives sending controller error messages even when they are not being used, OK, I dont believe that those would be because you are exceeding the 600W rating of the power supply. I meant that the power supply may be failing, putting more noise on the rails than is allowed. If thats the case, just replacing it with another copy of the 600W supply should see that problem go away. and I'm also noticing some occasional spin retry errors on a few of my internal HDD's. Thats unlikely to be because doesnt have enough current on the 12V rail even tho you do have quite a few hard drives from memory. If that is the problem, it makes more sense ot replace some of the smaller drives with new much larger ones than it does to change the power supply, tho you should change the power supply because of the optical drive symptoms you are getting to see if thats due to the power supply. You dont necessarily need such a big supply for that test tho. That wouldnt normally be the case unless you have one hell of a video card in it. Well, the video card is not a monster of any kind, it's more upper mainstream, an AMD Radeon 6870. Yeah, it only need 2 75W power connectors. The 12V rails on that power supply are way above what it needs. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. And I would be amazed if you are exceeding that. Well, I ran my system components through a few power supply calculators: I dont buy those. What matters is AMD's statement of what the video card needs, http://www.amd.com/us/products/deskt...verview.aspx#3 and thats where that 2 75W power connectors comes from, and that detail you have already provided on 4 12V 16A rails. Those are 192W rails, each one of them. http://extreme.outervision.com/PSUEngine said I needed 580W. http://www.thermaltake.outervision.com/Power said I needed 574W. http://support.asus.com/powersupply.aspx said I needed 900W!!! Yeah, thats obviously silly. Obviously, the Asus rating is an outlier so I'm ignoring that one, but the other two seem to agree pretty close to each other, But nothing like what you get when you calculate the 12V rails explicitly. That power supply handles the video card fine with 2 of the rails and you have two more for your hard drives which wont take anything like 384W even if they are all trying to spin up at once. and that level is pretty close to the maximum power rating (within 96-97%) of my old PS. Thats the problem with those power supply 'calculators', they dont actually calculate what matters, the 12V rail currents. And the 900W supply you are considering only has 1A more 12V current available anyway. And with the age of the PS advancing in years, its maximum capacity might actually be decreasing over time. Nope, that doesnt happen. What you can get is a deterioration of the low ESR caps and that sees a lot more noise on the rails than there should be, but you dont see a reduction in the rail current capacity and even if you did you are nowhere near the maximum currents on any of those 12V rails. When I first obtained this 600W PS, the PS calculator showed that my system requirement was only in the upper 400W range. Do you mean that the calculator has changed, or that what you have in that system has changed that much ? So I thought I had more than enough leeway, but it looks like the various upgrades have quickly taken up most of that leeway since then. Or the calculator has changed since then. What have you changed upgrade wise ? The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! And even the biggest is only 1A more than you currently have. When you add it up, yes the 4 separate rails come out to about 64A, but the point is is it possible that some of the rails are overloaded by themselves? Nope, not with that particular video card. Would it be easier to distribute the power if there was a single larger rail rather than 4 smaller rails? No, in fact its harder because you cant do a remote sense so that the highest current rail is seeing 12V at the pins without increasing what the other connects get at the pins. Not that that matter much, the specs on the variation in the 12V rails is pretty wide. And you have the other problem with a single rail too, limiting the current to say 75A can still see a decent fire with some shorts. You dont get that with 4 seperate 16A max current rails. 200W isnt that bad as long as there is someone around to turn it off. 800W can be pretty spectacular in the very small space of a single molex nylon connector. Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? So they dont have to have 4 separate 12V regulators. I found one possible explanation he http://www.overclock.net/t/88626/inf...iple-12v-rails According to the above, the EU had mandated that no single +12V rail could exceed 20A, and that later Intel also embraced that EU rule, and further reduced that down to 18A. But now it looks like Intel no longer requires the 18A rule. Yeah, if thats accurate, it likely is the reason for the change. I'm not sure if the EU has also dropped its 20A requirement, but here in North America there is no longer a need to have separate rails anymore, so we can go to single super-rails. I dont like the idea of a single rail that can in theory deliver 800W being able to do short circuit protection adequately myself. Corse most of the time a short would just blow off quite literally but that doesnt always happen. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Single-rail vs. multi-rail power supplies?
Grant wrote
Yousuf Khan wrote I currently have a desktop with a Zalman 600W PS, it was a pretty nice PS a few years ago when I got it, but now it looks like the system has been upgraded and grown again, and I'm starting to see signs that it's not producing enough power for the components anymore. So I'm looking at the market for bigger PS's, likely 750W+. When I got the Zalman, multi-rail +12V were the de riguer feature of the day. Now that I'm shopping for them again, I see that the manufacturers have done an about-face, and they are advertising the advantages of single-rail +12V. The old 600W had 4 rails at 16 Amps each. The new single rails I'm seeing seem to have a rail at anywhere from 45A to 65A! Why have the manufacturers done the about-face on single-rail vs. multi-rail? Multi-rail was a cheap way to produce the high power, but it limits the distribution of that power into defined loads, loads that the user would perhaps not be able to judge correctly. Single rail makes distributing the 12V a 'don't care' as far as splitting up the load to suit the power supply. Much simpler, more efficient. But its got real downsides short protection and fire prevention wise. An 800W short can be quite spectacular. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question about the negative 5 volt rail on my power supply. | [email protected] | General | 8 | October 13th 07 03:15 AM |
A question about the negative 5 volt rail on my power supply. | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 8 | October 13th 07 03:15 AM |
pci-express 6pin or dongle pci express 12volt rail for single 1950xtx | xtera | Ati Videocards | 0 | December 10th 06 04:54 AM |
low power from 12v rail | [email protected] | General | 3 | August 5th 06 09:11 AM |