If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
fred wrote:
"NoNoBadDog!" wrote in message news:io3qe.23851$KQ2.14967@trnddc08... wrote in message groups.com... Boy am I confused. Hi, I saw the MS yellow shield which indicated an MS download is awaiting. I clicked on it and a large gray dialog box asked if I wish to download DELL graphics drivers. I clicked YES and waited a second or two and then received a dialog box that advised the downloads could NOT be done...no explanation!! What gives. I removed all programs that were running in the back ground before I tried the downloads. Mike You should never download MS drivers for your hardware. Wrong, always use drivers recommended by MS Update -after- you've updated to the latest Dell stuff. Always use those supplied by the manufacturer (Dell). First but not only. HW mfgs stop providing new fixes/versions at some point and often that's before MS does. The MS drivers are not the same as those supplied by Dell, and may degrade the performance of your computer. Nonsense. As others have said, you are incorrect. For example, on my desktop I have an ATI card and Windows Update wants me to use the update published in February of this year over the Catalyst driver published today (6/9/05) by ATI, themselves. I agree that in the very long run, when OEM's stop providing drivers for products that have reached their end-of-life periods, you ought to use ones put out by MS. However, in the case of products who are still supported by their producers, it's in your best interest to use OEM publishers latest drivers. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"NuTCrAcKeR" wrote in message ... WOW, do you have any clue regarding these matters? You must claim that the color of the website banner come into this somewhere? you are ignornat. I agree with the otherguy ... never install device drivers via windows update. They are the baseline reference drivers, not the preferred OEM drivers. They are there largely, as the other guy said, to get basic plug-n-play support for devices until you can install the current OEM drivers for the devices. Get a clue. What I said and is the standard procedure for the competent is to download and install the latest from the system mfg and/or component mfg. THEN if Windows Update still offers a driver for the gadget then by all means download and install MS's version. Just 2 days ago, I accidently downloaded a CMedia sound driver via windows update. My board has an nForce 2 chipset, so its an nVidia audio chip. Windows update mis-identified my hardware. the driver that was downloaded and installed stopped the sound from working AT ALL. I had to do a driver rollback to get my sound back. That is just 1 instance, and over the years there have been many others. On the servers I manage, there are often new Intel, HP, Emulex, etc drivers available, and I would get fired if I ever let WU install those. Moral of the story ... DO NOT USE WU FOR DEVICE DRIVER INSTALLS. EVER. PERIOD. A moral from the clueless. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Nicholas Andrade" wrote in message . com... fred wrote: "NoNoBadDog!" wrote in message news:io3qe.23851$KQ2.14967@trnddc08... wrote in message groups.com... Boy am I confused. Hi, I saw the MS yellow shield which indicated an MS download is awaiting. I clicked on it and a large gray dialog box asked if I wish to download DELL graphics drivers. I clicked YES and waited a second or two and then received a dialog box that advised the downloads could NOT be done...no explanation!! What gives. I removed all programs that were running in the back ground before I tried the downloads. Mike You should never download MS drivers for your hardware. Wrong, always use drivers recommended by MS Update -after- you've updated to the latest Dell stuff. Always use those supplied by the manufacturer (Dell). First but not only. HW mfgs stop providing new fixes/versions at some point and often that's before MS does. The MS drivers are not the same as those supplied by Dell, and may degrade the performance of your computer. Nonsense. As others have said, you are incorrect. For example, on my desktop I have an ATI card and Windows Update wants me to use the update published in February of this year over the Catalyst driver published today (6/9/05) by ATI, themselves. I agree that in the very long run, when OEM's stop providing drivers for products that have reached their end-of-life periods, you ought to use ones put out by MS. However, in the case of products who are still supported by their producers, it's in your best interest to use OEM publishers latest drivers. Right, usually Windows Update stops offering a driver if the one on the system is newer than MS's. I wonder what's happening there? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"fred" wrote in message ... "NuTCrAcKeR" wrote in message ... WOW, do you have any clue regarding these matters? You must claim that the color of the website banner come into this somewhere? you are ignornat. I agree with the otherguy ... never install device drivers via windows update. They are the baseline reference drivers, not the preferred OEM drivers. They are there largely, as the other guy said, to get basic plug-n-play support for devices until you can install the current OEM drivers for the devices. Get a clue. What I said and is the standard procedure for the competent is to download and install the latest from the system mfg and/or component mfg. THEN if Windows Update still offers a driver for the gadget then by all means download and install MS's version. Just 2 days ago, I accidently downloaded a CMedia sound driver via windows update. My board has an nForce 2 chipset, so its an nVidia audio chip. Windows update mis-identified my hardware. the driver that was downloaded and installed stopped the sound from working AT ALL. I had to do a driver rollback to get my sound back. That is just 1 instance, and over the years there have been many others. On the servers I manage, there are often new Intel, HP, Emulex, etc drivers available, and I would get fired if I ever let WU install those. Moral of the story ... DO NOT USE WU FOR DEVICE DRIVER INSTALLS. EVER. PERIOD. A moral from the clueless. ATI has just released the Catalyst 5.6 drivers for their video cards. S. you are telling me that I should install these drivers (released yesterday), and then go and download the driver "update" on Windows update that was released over 4 months ago? You are the clueless one. Since you cannot mount a defense for the drivel you are spewing, perhaps it is time for *YOU* to realize that when one makes a mistake and is not willing to admit it, it might be better to simply STFU. You continue to show your complete ignorance of the relevant facts here. Welcome to the killfile. Bobby |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Welcome to the killfile. Bobby agreed. He made my killfile filter as well |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
| Microsoft offer basic driver sets for popular hardware. This is for the
| benefit of enterprise level hardware on which manufacturers "extended" | drivers are not needed. While some of these drivers are supplied by the | manufacturers themselves, quite often they are generic non-OEm drivers | developed by Microsoft. In general terms, these drivers are baseline | drivers, intended for installation on mission hardware with a minimum | footprint and still provide functionality. | | If there's any content to that gibber it's hard to find. | | They are not and never have been recommended as replacements or | enhancements | to the manufacturers drivers designed for consumer machines. | A simple experiment will demonstrate this; | | 1. Download the latest driver posted at Dell; save it on your HDD but | don't | install it. | 2. Download the "same" driver form the Microsoft website. Save it to your | HDD and don't install it. | | Now, simply compare the file sizes. | | Hmmm.... | | WOW, do you have any clue regarding these matters? You must claim that the | color of the website banner come into this somewhere? | Fred, Baddog is exactly correct and seems to know (on this topic at least :-) exactly what he's talking about. Downloading device drivers from WUD is a bad idea. Spend a little time in the Microsoft Public Newsgroups and you'll find that even Microsoft MVPs recommend obtaining drivers from the manufacturer of the device as opposed to WUD. As baddog correctly stated the drivers offered @ WUD basic functionality generally are missing extended functions that the manufacturers driver provide. A frequent thread in the MS Newsgroups goes something like; "I just downloaded a driver from Windows Update and now my (fill-in-the-blank) doesn't work anymore." The response is invariably, "don't get your drivers from Windows Update. Go to the manufacturers support site for your computer/device and obtain as driver there." -- Doug I'm not an MVP a VIP nor do I have ESP. I was just trying to help. Please use your own best judgment before implementing any suggestions or advice herein. No warranty is expressed or implied. Your mileage may vary. See store for details. Remove shoes to E-mail. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Equally true for network cards, audio cards, and just about any other hardware
you will find in a computer... Ben Myers On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 04:51:56 GMT, "fred" wrote: ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) wrote in message ... There's no set formula whether drivers from Microsoft or Dell are better. I've had drivers from the Microsoft update site hose up a system, so they should NEVER be characterized as perfection. Name brand manufacturers tend to lag way behind in providing updated drivers, because all they really care about is selling new systems, not supporting existing ones. The bottom line is that very few desktop and server systems use customized chipsets, and drivers are tightly tied to the chipset. (Way back when computers cost thousands of dollars, Compaq and others imposed on chipset manufacturers to make some chips a little different. Once Compaq found out the high cost of supporting custom chipsets, it then began using standard ones across the board(s). ) Me? I almost routinely go to the web site of the chipset or motherboard manufacturer. For example, the drivers from the Intel web site are just fine for motherboard chipsets and built-in Intel "extreme graphics". The chipset manufacturer does all the work to correct driver defects, then issues copies to Micro$oft and the name brand manufacturers and/or board manufacturers. So if you want the latest, go to the website of the chipset manufacturer... Ben Myers Probably true for the chipset driver and display drivers but then that wasn't the issue at hand was it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What's happening is that you can't trust Microsoft's update to always do the
right thing. This has always been the case. As with anything else Microsoft touches, they have made software updates so damned complicated that they confuse themselves... Ben Myers On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:52:51 GMT, "fred" wrote: "Nicholas Andrade" wrote in message .com... fred wrote: "NoNoBadDog!" wrote in message news:io3qe.23851$KQ2.14967@trnddc08... wrote in message groups.com... Boy am I confused. Hi, I saw the MS yellow shield which indicated an MS download is awaiting. I clicked on it and a large gray dialog box asked if I wish to download DELL graphics drivers. I clicked YES and waited a second or two and then received a dialog box that advised the downloads could NOT be done...no explanation!! What gives. I removed all programs that were running in the back ground before I tried the downloads. Mike You should never download MS drivers for your hardware. Wrong, always use drivers recommended by MS Update -after- you've updated to the latest Dell stuff. Always use those supplied by the manufacturer (Dell). First but not only. HW mfgs stop providing new fixes/versions at some point and often that's before MS does. The MS drivers are not the same as those supplied by Dell, and may degrade the performance of your computer. Nonsense. As others have said, you are incorrect. For example, on my desktop I have an ATI card and Windows Update wants me to use the update published in February of this year over the Catalyst driver published today (6/9/05) by ATI, themselves. I agree that in the very long run, when OEM's stop providing drivers for products that have reached their end-of-life periods, you ought to use ones put out by MS. However, in the case of products who are still supported by their producers, it's in your best interest to use OEM publishers latest drivers. Right, usually Windows Update stops offering a driver if the one on the system is newer than MS's. I wonder what's happening there? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
" HW mfgs stop providing new fixes/versions at some point and often that's
before MS does." Huh? This gives me the impression that Microsoft has a whole bunch of worker bees scrutinizing the drivers and fixing them up. And we are supposed to think that Microsoft is so gracious and caring that they would do this? Sure! I'd like to buy the Brooklyn Bridge while we're at it, too. First, to get hardware device drivers onto the Windows installation CD and or to get the latest versions of drivers onto the Microsoft update site, the chipset developers (e.g, Intel and VIA for motherboards; Intel, ATI and nVidia for graphics; Intel, 3com, Realtek for network cards; Conexant and PCTel for modems; Creative and ADI for audio) first pay Microsoft for the privilege of including the drivers on the install CD, then they pay to have each edition of drivers tested in Microsoft's Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL), and they probably pay by the megabyte for space on the update web site. WHQL DOES run some pretty extensive tests on the drivers before they are affixed with an electronic WHQL certificate and made available as updates. Why are updates even done by the hardware manufacturers? Three reasons. The one most people should be concerned about is to fix defects. The next is to fix glaring performance problems, such as those revealed recently by a 3rd party company testing network drivers. The third, usually the case for ATI, nVidia and Intel, is to incorporate new hardware into an omnibus driver, i.e. a single driver set that supports a wide variety of chips. Examples are Intel's 800-series motherboard chipsets and nVidia's family of graphics chips. Many hardware manufacturers, especially those of low-volume devices such as scanners and special purpose printers, often do not submit their drivers to WHQL because it is too expensive to do so. Hardware manufacturers often augment their driver sets with additional utilities, which you will not find on the Microsoft update site. Examples might be better fine-tuning of graphics capabilities (ATI, nVidia, Matrox) and additional audio features (ADI and Creative). Now where is it that the supposed Microsoft hardware driver developers enter into play in the above scenario??? ... Ben Myers On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:04:39 GMT, "fred" wrote: "NoNoBadDog!" wrote in message news:io3qe.23851$KQ2.14967@trnddc08... wrote in message oups.com... Boy am I confused. Hi, I saw the MS yellow shield which indicated an MS download is awaiting. I clicked on it and a large gray dialog box asked if I wish to download DELL graphics drivers. I clicked YES and waited a second or two and then received a dialog box that advised the downloads could NOT be done...no explanation!! What gives. I removed all programs that were running in the back ground before I tried the downloads. Mike You should never download MS drivers for your hardware. Wrong, always use drivers recommended by MS Update -after- you've updated to the latest Dell stuff. Always use those supplied by the manufacturer (Dell). First but not only. HW mfgs stop providing new fixes/versions at some point and often that's before MS does. The MS drivers are not the same as those supplied by Dell, and may degrade the performance of your computer. Nonsense. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodbye Dell, Hello IBM or Toshiba? | Giganews | Dell Computers | 56 | October 4th 05 12:29 PM |
Dell PowerEdge 2400 drivers | LightLady110 | General | 4 | March 21st 05 05:33 PM |
Is Dell P1110 21" monitor the same as Liyama S102GT 21" monitor? | private person | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 25th 04 04:56 PM |
Nvidia says two ways to install drivers | Dudley Henriques | Nvidia Videocards | 11 | December 8th 03 07:17 PM |
Intermittent Inspiron 8200 Power Supply when Docked | Patrick J. Chicas | Dell Computers | 17 | October 24th 03 04:21 AM |