If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"~misfit~" wrote in message ... Max wrote: "Lee" wrote in message ... What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:01:18 GMT, "Herr Pie" wrote: I can run my P4 2.4C on an ABIT IC7 @ 250FSB for 3ghz and 1000mhz memory speed OR I can run it at 280FSB for 3.3ghz. If I run at the higher FSB, I have to use a 5:4 multiplier hat reduces the memory to 896mhz. SO, the quetion is, which is better for mostly gaming?? I have a 9800Pro. THANKS. ----- Lee. I think that if you look ever so carefully you will find that I didn't mention Benchmarking programs did I ? (not that I have anything against them). It appears that you are far too simple to work this out for yourself so allow me to elaborate.... If assmunch is interested in gaming performance then I would imagine that benchmarking with something like UT flyby and Botmatch may do the trick. ( or quake 1 demo1, demo1.dm2 for q2, torture or blow out test for HL.....you get the picture ...??) Glad I could be of assistance..... I see your point Max but I find 3DMark to be fairly useful in cases like this, or N Bench. (although it's an AMD proggy, I'm not sure it'll run on an Intel) **** Sandra et al. -- ~misfit~ Aye , agreed I do use 3dmark and find it a helpfull tool max |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
You almost wrote a nice answer for once without calling someone a name like
dumbass or assmunch, that wasn't hard was it? Of course you did start out basically telling him he was simple minded. I don't care how smart a person thinks they are, you don't have to be demeaning to the person asking the question, especially if you think your a know it all. "Max" wrote in message ... I think that if you look ever so carefully you will find that I didn't mention Benchmarking programs did I ? (not that I have anything against them). It appears that you are far too simple to work this out for yourself so allow me to elaborate.... If assmunch is interested in gaming performance then I would imagine that benchmarking with something like UT flyby and Botmatch may do the trick. ( or quake 1 demo1, demo1.dm2 for q2, torture or blow out test for HL.....you get the picture ...??) Glad I could be of assistance..... max |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hi OF,
I agree wholeheartedly. There is no need to demean anyone here. Tolerance is a quality to be admired. -- Tally Ho! Ed "OldFartJAC" wrote in message newsN55c.24961$BA.1014@fed1read03... You almost wrote a nice answer for once without calling someone a name like dumbass or assmunch, that wasn't hard was it? Of course you did start out basically telling him he was simple minded. I don't care how smart a person thinks they are, you don't have to be demeaning to the person asking the question, especially if you think your a know it all. "Max" wrote in message ... I think that if you look ever so carefully you will find that I didn't mention Benchmarking programs did I ? (not that I have anything against them). It appears that you are far too simple to work this out for yourself so allow me to elaborate.... If assmunch is interested in gaming performance then I would imagine that benchmarking with something like UT flyby and Botmatch may do the trick. ( or quake 1 demo1, demo1.dm2 for q2, torture or blow out test for HL.....you get the picture ...??) Glad I could be of assistance..... max |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:35:20 GMT, Lee
wrote: What do benchmarking programs tell you? Well, I must admit I do get a woody! That and Max calling someone an assmunch make my day! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Lee wrote:
What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. The amusing thing is they're both about a 10% difference one way or the other. I.E. 10% more CPU for 10% less FSB. On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:01:18 GMT, "Herr Pie" wrote: :I can run my P4 2.4C on an ABIT IC7 @ 250FSB for 3ghz and 1000mhz memory :speed OR I can run it at 280FSB for 3.3ghz. If I run at the higher FSB, I :have to use a 5:4 multiplier hat reduces the memory to 896mhz. SO, the :quetion is, which is better for mostly gaming?? I have a 9800Pro. THANKS. : ----- Lee. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Max wrote:
Ps Big Macs come with cheese you thick ******* Ah, smart. Charge everyone for cheese, but don't give a refund if they order it without. You want fries with that-- or is it chips over there... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"David Maynard" wrote in message ... Lee wrote: What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. The amusing thing is they're both about a 10% difference one way or the other. I.E. 10% more CPU for 10% less FSB. ----- Lee. What in the name of sweet Jesus is amusing about that.... You need to get out more max |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Max wrote:
What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. The amusing thing is they're both about a 10% difference one way or the other. I.E. 10% more CPU for 10% less FSB. What in the name of sweet Jesus is amusing about that.... You need to get out more Hahaha, that one is truly hilarious, it brought tears to my eyes :-D Thomas |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Max wrote:
"David Maynard" wrote in message ... Lee wrote: What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. The amusing thing is they're both about a 10% difference one way or the other. I.E. 10% more CPU for 10% less FSB. ----- Lee. What in the name of sweet Jesus is amusing about that.... You need to get out more Well, before we get to that maybe you should tell me where it is you go to loose the sense of humor so I can avoid those places. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Max" wrote in message ... "David Maynard" wrote in message ... Lee wrote: What do benchmarking programs tell you? i.e. sisoft or Aida32. At a guess i would say the 280fsb @3.3ghz your only losing like 100mhz fsb but gaining 300mhz clock speed and 30mhz more fsb which will help gaming. The amusing thing is they're both about a 10% difference one way or the other. I.E. 10% more CPU for 10% less FSB. ----- Lee. What in the name of sweet Jesus is amusing about that.... You need to get out more Yeah that was great! Too bad a fool like Max is unable to apprecitate it! hahahaha Ryan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|