If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mobile Fidelity CDr's (is it risky to burn higher than 1x)?
I recently purchased some Mobile Fidelity CDr's and I wanted to burn
some things that are very important to me (audio). Their website advises to burn at 'real time' or 1x. I've burned a couple of things at 4x (with Exact Audio Copy -- EAC) and everything seems fine. I just want to check with others who know if I really should be burning at 1x instead? I would burn at 1x but the only burning program I have is EAC and it only goes down to 4x. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with "Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face? -------------------------------------- soundandvision wrote: I recently purchased some Mobile Fidelity CDr's and I wanted to burn some things that are very important to me (audio). Their website advises to burn at 'real time' or 1x. I've burned a couple of things at 4x (with Exact Audio Copy -- EAC) and everything seems fine. I just want to check with others who know if I really should be burning at 1x instead? I would burn at 1x but the only burning program I have is EAC and it only goes down to 4x. (Check your burner spec to see if it supports 1x. 4x is the slowest with the current crop of burners, that is, you don't have a choice.) Don't know if you should or not, but the demo version of CDRWin burns only at 1x: http://www.goldenhawk.com ' ================================================== ====== Who Is Mike Richter and Why Are They Saying All These Horrible Things About Him? ================================================== ====== http://tinyurl.com/6eldj (No Mikey S-lickers have been able to prove ANY of the following is) ( a LIBEL -- despite Mikey claimed to have proof of misquotes !! ) Mike Richter is a LIAR (wife beating) Mike Richter is a LIAR (critical bugs) Mike Richter is a LIAR (major bug) Mike Richter is a LIAR (nda limit) Mike Richter is a LIAR (nda) Mike Richter is a LIAR (no secret) Mike Richter is a LIAR (no secret)(ii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (dae) Mike Richter is a LIAR (enhanced-cd) Mike Richter is a LIAR (no enhanced cd) Mike Richter is a LIAR (enhanced-cd/cdr-faq) Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/cd-text) Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/sao/tao)(i) Mike Richter is a LIAR (cd-extra/single-session) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/winme)(i) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/winme)(ii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(i) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(ii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(iii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(iv) Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/plextor) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(i) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(ii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(iii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(iv) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(v) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(vi) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(vii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(8a) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/eject)(9a) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (i) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (ii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (iii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (iv) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (v) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (vi) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (vii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (viii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (ix) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (x) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (xi) Mike Richter is a LIAR (directcd/sparing) (xii) Mike Richter is a LIAR (supplied cd) What's wrong with Mike Richter (Tim Kroesen) (i) What's wrong with Mike Richter (Tim Kroesen) (ii) Mike Richter Wow! Wow! Wow! Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (i) Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (ii) Mike Richter's Exquisite Sense of Time (iii) Mike Richter & "Looooooooonng" Time for Nothing What an Asshole |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On 2 Aug 2005 19:41:23 -0700, soundandvision
wrote: I recently purchased some Mobile Fidelity CDr's and I wanted to burn some things that are very important to me (audio). Their website advises to burn at 'real time' or 1x. I've burned a couple of things at 4x (with Exact Audio Copy -- EAC) and everything seems fine. I just want to check with others who know if I really should be burning at 1x instead? I would burn at 1x but the only burning program I have is EAC and it only goes down to 4x. Who makes the Mobile Fidelity discs? I'd guess at Mitsui or one of its offshoots. These discs are almost certainly intended for use in audio recorders which, by definition, work in real time at 1X. Most audio only discs will work at 4X in a computer drive but, if the data really is as precious as you say, then you need to test each burn with a drive that will report low level errors (like a Plextor Premium with Plextools) so that you can properly ascertain the quality of the burn. You might be surprised to find that higher speed burns are better quality than low speed burns with many drive/media combinations. Cheers. James. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
soundandvision wrote:
I recently purchased some Mobile Fidelity CDr's and I wanted to burn some things that are very important to me (audio). Their website advises to burn at 'real time' or 1x. I've burned a couple of things at 4x (with Exact Audio Copy -- EAC) and everything seems fine. I just want to check with others who know if I really should be burning at 1x instead? I would burn at 1x but the only burning program I have is EAC and it only goes down to 4x. The usual answer applies: Measure the quality. It's easy enough with CDSpeed or an equivalent to determine C1 and C2 error counts. Though others assure me that it's not possible to have zero errors, that is my routine result with Mitsui silver and Taiyo-Yuden media in a Plexwriter at 12x. If you are getting errors, try other speeds. If EAC won't burn slower than 4x and you want 1x, look for other software such as Feurio or Nero. Mike -- http://www.mrichter.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Okay, I downloaded CDSpeed and used it (didn't delve into all of it's
functions, though). For example...one of the discs I made the other day had 2 C1 errors, is this serious? No jitter, no C2 errors. I'm looking online for a good copy of Nero..seems like everything is trial version only. I would like to burn at 1x since MFSL suggests that. Does Nero offer the same type of ripping that EAC does? I really like the layout (and am used to) EAC. Knowing that my track quality is 100% is reassuring, I like that in EAC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I noticed that Nero only goes down to 4x, too..
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
soundandvision wrote:
I noticed that Nero only goes down to 4x, too.. No, Nero will do whatever your blank and your drive will support. I just checked - though I was sure - and it runs down to 1x on an old blank (made in 1998 - I've been at this for a while) in a Plexwriter 1210s. Why is it always the software that gets the blame? Presumably (given the properties you cite), the blank permits 1x writing. Given that Nero (and EAC - I checked that as well) would happily write at 1x, the conclusion is: Your drive doesn't write slower than 4x. Of course, if you had mentioned the name somewhere along the line, someone might have confirmation to offer. Without knowing make and model, all I can say is that many modern super-duper-extra-fast drives won't write slowly. As for your error count: it's low, but I'll bet it would be lower still (probably 0, 0) at 1x or 2x. Mike -- http://www.mrichter.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mike,
Here's my drive info... Lite-On LTN486S 48x Max |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mike,
Here's my drive info... Lite-On LTN486S 48x Max |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 10:23:20 -0700, Mike Richter wrote:
The usual answer applies: Measure the quality. It's easy enough with CDSpeed or an equivalent to determine C1 and C2 error counts. Though others assure me that it's not possible to have zero errors, that is my routine result with Mitsui silver and Taiyo-Yuden media in a Plexwriter at 12x. Are you using the 1210S to measure errors? If so then I'm not surprised that you don't see any C1 errors because it can't report them. Only certain newer chipsets support the measurement of C1 errors. The 1210S can report C2 errors but these should never occur with a properly working drive and reasonable quality discs. Cheers. James. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Forcing Higher Burn Speed with Nero 6 | asdf | Cdr | 9 | July 30th 04 02:24 AM |
Athlon XP 2100+ to mobile 2600+ worth the upgrage? | yuki | Overclocking AMD Processors | 15 | April 13th 04 02:21 PM |
FUNNY Gateway Chat about "Centrino Mobile Technology". | newtothis | Gateway Computers | 13 | February 29th 04 02:24 AM |
Higher prices for CDRs they say in a news article | Mutley | Cdr | 7 | November 9th 03 10:04 AM |