A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Intel
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Prescott



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 16th 03, 11:48 AM
Ricardo Delazy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Prescott

On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 23:04:18 GMT, "Richard Williams"
wrote:

Anyone know the release date? Worth waiting for?



I've heard that the release date has been pushed back to the end of this
year as a result of AMD's delay with their 64bit chip.

From what I've read about it, it sounds like quite a powerful processor,
and there is speculation that it might be classified as a Pentium 5 or
similar.

And yes, I'm waiting for it.

Ricardo Delazy
  #2  
Old July 16th 03, 02:50 PM
Alex Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ricardo Delazy wrote:
I've heard that the release date has been pushed back to the end of this
year as a result of AMD's delay with their 64bit chip.


Given that at the beginning of the year intel came out and said Prescott
would ship in Q4 (previously just said "second half"), this is not
really a revelation. I doubt it could be connected to AMD's delay since
the intel announcement was months before AMD's. Of course lately I keep
hearing rumors that rather than end of Q4, like I've always expected,
intel might ship at the start of Q4. I have found no support for this
yet, but I have heard the rumor from several directions.


From what I've read about it, it sounds like quite a powerful processor,
and there is speculation that it might be classified as a Pentium 5 or
similar.

What exactly have you read about it that makes it sound powerful? It is
just a Willamette/Northwood on a new process with bigger cache and some
new instructions, like every new generation/shrink. As for Pentium 5,
the rumor rags have been tossing that out for over a year, but it makes
no sense. With Prescott being just a faster P4 (and not faster at
launch from what I've gathered) there is absolutely no reason to go burn
the Pentium 5 name. I expect it to be yet another Pentium 4, maybe with
some tagline at the end, like "Pentium with MMX Technology" it would be
"Pentium 4 with BLAH Technology". After Prescott I expect a shift away
from Pentium 4, but that's years away still.

Alex
--
My words are my own. They represent no other; they belong to no other.
Don't read anything into them or you may be required to compensate me
for violation of copyright. (I do not speak for my employer.)

  #3  
Old July 22nd 03, 04:05 PM
Judd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Alex Johnson" wrote in message
...
Ricardo Delazy wrote:
I've heard that the release date has been pushed back to the end of this
year as a result of AMD's delay with their 64bit chip.


Given that at the beginning of the year intel came out and said Prescott
would ship in Q4 (previously just said "second half"), this is not
really a revelation. I doubt it could be connected to AMD's delay since
the intel announcement was months before AMD's. Of course lately I keep
hearing rumors that rather than end of Q4, like I've always expected,
intel might ship at the start of Q4. I have found no support for this
yet, but I have heard the rumor from several directions.


From what I've read about it, it sounds like quite a powerful processor,
and there is speculation that it might be classified as a Pentium 5 or
similar.

What exactly have you read about it that makes it sound powerful? It is
just a Willamette/Northwood on a new process with bigger cache and some
new instructions, like every new generation/shrink. As for Pentium 5,
the rumor rags have been tossing that out for over a year, but it makes
no sense. With Prescott being just a faster P4 (and not faster at
launch from what I've gathered) there is absolutely no reason to go burn
the Pentium 5 name. I expect it to be yet another Pentium 4, maybe with
some tagline at the end, like "Pentium with MMX Technology" it would be
"Pentium 4 with BLAH Technology". After Prescott I expect a shift away
from Pentium 4, but that's years away still.


Office cooler talk or do you know an Intel insider or something?


  #4  
Old July 22nd 03, 08:42 PM
Alex Johnson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Judd wrote:
"Alex Johnson" wrote in message
...

Ricardo Delazy wrote:

I've heard that the release date has been pushed back to the end of this
year as a result of AMD's delay with their 64bit chip.


Given that at the beginning of the year intel came out and said Prescott
would ship in Q4 (previously just said "second half"), this is not
really a revelation. I doubt it could be connected to AMD's delay since
the intel announcement was months before AMD's. Of course lately I keep
hearing rumors that rather than end of Q4, like I've always expected,
intel might ship at the start of Q4. I have found no support for this
yet, but I have heard the rumor from several directions.



From what I've read about it, it sounds like quite a powerful processor,
and there is speculation that it might be classified as a Pentium 5 or
similar.


What exactly have you read about it that makes it sound powerful? It is
just a Willamette/Northwood on a new process with bigger cache and some
new instructions, like every new generation/shrink. As for Pentium 5,
the rumor rags have been tossing that out for over a year, but it makes
no sense. With Prescott being just a faster P4 (and not faster at
launch from what I've gathered) there is absolutely no reason to go burn
the Pentium 5 name. I expect it to be yet another Pentium 4, maybe with
some tagline at the end, like "Pentium with MMX Technology" it would be
"Pentium 4 with BLAH Technology". After Prescott I expect a shift away
from Pentium 4, but that's years away still.



Office cooler talk or do you know an Intel insider or something?



To what part are you refering? I have no insider info, but both inside
and outside the company the details of Prescott seem to be well defined
as a shrink of Northwood with additional cache and minor tweaks where
circuit tricks became too difficult. As for Pentium 4 name, it just
makes sense that it would stay the same, based on previous experience
(Pentium III being the possible exception). Why might the name end with
Prescott? Well look at the Pentium-M. It's much more cost effective
for intel to make, it is a much cooler part (both by physics and
awe-factor), and it is much more efficient than Pentium 4 in both power
and performance (compare a Banias to a Northwood, or better yet a Dothan
to a Prescott in a few months). I'm betting intel will shift focus to
this chip family. I've already seen stuff on the web stating the
Celeron line is switching again, from Pentium 4 to Pentium-M. I don't
know if it is true, but it sounds good to me.

Alex
--
My words are my own. They represent no other; they belong to no other.
Don't read anything into them or you may be required to compensate me
for violation of copyright. (I do not speak for my employer.)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prescott problems enumerated Felger Carbon General 8 March 24th 05 05:20 PM
Intel Prescott CPU in a Nutshell LuvrSmel Overclocking 1 January 10th 05 03:23 PM
P4P800E Deluxe/3.2 Prescott Confusion [email protected] Asus Motherboards 7 August 30th 04 09:54 AM
P4 Prescott 3.2GHz Leigh-Anne Mills Asus Motherboards 3 May 20th 04 03:26 AM
Prescott 2.8A 533FSB in 845E chipset Gigabyte 8IE533 greg Overclocking 2 February 4th 04 01:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.