A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking AMD Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Quad Cpu Mobo with Dual Core CPUS how fast would that be ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 16th 04, 03:44 AM
Dennis E Strausser Jr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Quad Cpu Mobo with Dual Core CPUS how fast would that be ?


"neopolaris" . wrote in message ...
Get off your lazy ass a google for some info. SEARCH something-anything.
Be a man and actually start providing answers and not questions. I

haven't
been on here in weeks and here ya are asking the same lame crap. You know
there is an internet right?

Huh, there's a such thing as the World Wide Web? The net.
Cool, how does that work?
Oh wait, with systems like he's asking about, in large Rack Mount systems.
Some are 2 Tb's Some are as much as 10 TB or more.
To answer his dumb question, if it's Xeon, Dual cpu = Four CPU's
One Logical CPU for each physical CPU
So four on one board would = 8 CPU's
If I remember right, back when I started learning a little
more about Windows,, as in 2000 & XP the OS's are made for up to 8 CPU's
or something like that.
I remember wondering why the support for so many CPU's when, and I didn't
know this
When there's only Dual boards out on market. I didn't know about Quad MB's
at the time.
When I did know about them, I didn't really know what HT was really.


Do yourself a favor, & us, look it up!!!
You can do it just as well as I can, or do your fingers have minds of their
own?
Denny. :-( I use to think u were cool, the only time I cross post, is when
it's relevant to
more then one group, Hyper Threading is more for the group that don't end
with AMD
It's more of an Intel question. ppl here don't need to know I'm running a
P4 2.6 GHz @ 2.99
For only one thing, to overclock the ram further for the added bandwidth
for encoding.
So when I post a question, it has something more to do with my xp 2.2+
running @ 1.18
@ 2800+ Stable, yes.
of which I did cross post this dumb reply to. I took off all the rest.
We Live for the One we Die for the One wrote:




  #2  
Old June 16th 04, 03:52 AM
Dennis E Strausser Jr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dennis E Strausser Jr" wrote in message
...

"neopolaris" . wrote in message

...
Get off your lazy ass a google for some info. SEARCH

something-anything.
Be a man and actually start providing answers and not questions. I

haven't
been on here in weeks and here ya are asking the same lame crap. You

know
there is an internet right?

Huh, there's a such thing as the World Wide Web? The net.
Cool, how does that work?
Oh wait, with systems like he's asking about, in large Rack Mount systems.
Some are 2 Tb's Some are as much as 10 TB or more.
To answer his dumb question, if it's Xeon, Dual cpu = Four CPU's
One Logical CPU for each physical CPU
So four on one board would = 8 CPU's
If I remember right, back when I started learning a little
more about Windows,, as in 2000 & XP the OS's are made for up to 8 CPU's
or something like that.
I remember wondering why the support for so many CPU's when, and I didn't
know this
When there's only Dual boards out on market. I didn't know about Quad

MB's
at the time.
When I did know about them, I didn't really know what HT was really.


Do yourself a favor, & us, look it up!!!
You can do it just as well as I can, or do your fingers have minds of

their
own?
Denny. :-( I use to think u were cool, the only time I cross post, is when
it's relevant to
more then one group, Hyper Threading is more for the group that don't end
with AMD
It's more of an Intel question. ppl here don't need to know I'm running a
P4 2.6 GHz @ 2.99
For only one thing, to overclock the ram further for the added bandwidth
for encoding.
So when I post a question, it has something more to do with my xp 2.2+
running @ 1.18 (((2.18))) Oops...
@ 2800+ Stable, yes.
of which I did cross post this dumb reply to. I took off all the rest.
We Live for the One we Die for the One wrote:






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quad Cpu Mobo with Dual Core CPUS how fast would that be ? Dennis E Strausser Jr Overclocking 1 June 16th 04 03:52 AM
Quad Cpu Mobo with Dual Core CPUS how fast would that be ? We Live for the One we Die for the One General 0 June 14th 04 10:16 PM
Mobo for Athlon XP 2600+ (Barton Core) Paul General 4 February 19th 04 12:20 AM
Dual channel memory (cas3.0) VS. fast (cas2.0) memory badr Overclocking AMD Processors 8 February 11th 04 08:33 AM
fast memory slow mobo Husab Overclocking AMD Processors 1 October 18th 03 11:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.