If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
Isaac W. wrote:
I would guess that time line would be far sooner being that AMD chips are less expensive. That being said, I would say early 2007 or 2006 chrismas for all those geeks who want upgrades. I hope the conroe chip lives up to my expectations. Im likely going to wait for an upgrade then. AMD might make a really decent chip but it seems to me that AMD is still not as stable motherboard wise. *shrug* Have no idea what AMD motherboard you think is unstable, certainly there is more choice for Intel. The time to decide which computer to buy is when you need to buy a computer. There will always be something faster and/or cheaper if you wait six months. Of course you can wait forever to buy a computer upgrade, and if you just think a new computer would be fun that's a good thing to do. One thing is for sure, its going to be interesting how this all turns out. -- -bill davidsen ) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
Your the fool if you can't at least point out possible errors my ways.
You call me a fool and tear into me when I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. I have researched and looked at hardware and reviews always taking a critical eye at what and who is reporting this review and if there is personal biases involved. Btw FUD's are stupid IMHO, I said it was invalid and in poor taste earlier. Your the one that needs to grow up. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W."
wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... max |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On 20 Apr 2006 11:56:45 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote:
I was specifically referring to the mass amounts of junk that alot of the motherboard manufacturers push. They come DOA, Have crap for customer service, Ect. Ect. And you think the err, Intel brand name on a mbrd protects you from this and that *it* is not just "junk" from the same sweatshops? It's been 10 years at least now since Intel made a mbrd which could rank with the best of the 3rd party brands. If you want to criticize, put your money where your mouth is and prove me wrong. If you hadn't "noticed" by yourself.........shrug -- Rgds, George Macdonald |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:55:45 +0000, max wrote:
On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... ....and you're here, umm, why? -- Keith |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:40:18 -0400, Keith wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:55:45 +0000, max wrote: On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... ...and you're here, umm, why? umm, because there are some informative, balanced posters who take a rational, reasonable look at the issues before the threads devolve into tailchasing? because I enjoy reading the flamefests, just like reading Roddy Speed on the storage NG? because I feel like it? because I like to see how far people go to get the last word in? max |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:44:56 +0000, max wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:40:18 -0400, Keith wrote: On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:55:45 +0000, max wrote: On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... ...and you're here, umm, why? umm, because there are some informative, balanced posters who take a rational, reasonable look at the issues before the threads devolve into tailchasing? But you implied that such things aren't possible here. because I enjoy reading the flamefests, just like reading Roddy Speed on the storage NG? Ah, another troll, IOW. because I feel like it? because I like to see how far people go to get the last word in? Shoot. -- Keith |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips max wrote in part:
On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... Perhaps you are confusing "possible" with "probable". Definitions of "reasonable" vary. Everyone must use their own. -- Robert |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 16:42:20 GMT, Robert Redelmeier
wrote: In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips max wrote in part: On 20 Apr 2006 16:07:25 -0700, "Isaac W." wrote: I would rather have a reasonable conversation about these subjects. Some things aren't possible on this NG... Perhaps you are confusing "possible" with "probable". Definitions of "reasonable" vary. Everyone must use their own. OK, a slight bit of hyperbole on my part - some things aren't probable on this NG. Surely you've noticed that - you're a regular here (here referring to csiphc, not csi, which I don't frequent). I figure discussions leave the realm of reasonable when the name-calling starts, but as you say, everyone has their own definition. It does seem to be a predictable pattern across usenet. max |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wonderfully funny Inquirer Intel FUD presentation | [email protected] | General | 37 | April 27th 06 02:49 PM |
Dell vs. eMachines T6420 | dakota7 | Dell Computers | 35 | February 24th 06 04:14 PM |
Intel Onboard Chip v ATI Card | DellFan | Ati Videocards | 8 | December 21st 05 07:38 AM |
Amd-Intel | cathy | General | 1 | June 27th 05 01:44 PM |
Intel, AMD... | Mirko | General | 11 | November 22nd 04 07:17 AM |