If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's
On Jan 2, 2:34*pm, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
Robert Myers wrote in part: It's my estimation of your credibility, and it is perfectly legitimate argumentation. * No, entirely illegitimate. *Credibility only matters when facts are being reported, and ideally not even then since scientific facts must be replicatable to be worth anything. I, you and everyone else is engaged in interpretation, a form of argumentation which is supported or falls on the rules of logic you have previously disdained. You didn't offer facts, my tiresome interlocutor. You offered an opinion. When you offer an opinion, your credibility on the subject addressed matters. On the subject on which you offered an opinion, you have no credibility. Rhetoric is rhetoric and logic is logic and never the twain shall meet. Robert. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's
Robert Myers wrote in part:
You didn't offer facts, my tiresome interlocutor. You offered an opinion. No, I presented an argument. My personal opinions are usually unstated, and no-one should assume that I like any of the arguments I present. I merely find them worthy of consideration. When you offer an opinion, your credibility on the subject addressed matters. Only if unsupported by argument. Unlike you, I do not ask people to believe my conclusions. I ask they consider my arguments. Rhetoric is rhetoric and logic is logic and never the twain shall meet. You want tiresome, you got it: Logic is part of rhetoric. So are less reliable devices based on ethos and pathos. -- Robert R |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's
On Jan 3, 11:56*pm, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
Robert Myers wrote in part: You didn't offer facts, my tiresome interlocutor. You offered an opinion. * No, I presented an argument. *My personal opinions are usually unstated, and no-one should assume that I like any of the arguments I present. *I merely find them worthy of consideration. When you offer an opinion, your credibility on the subject addressed matters. * Only if unsupported by argument. *Unlike you, I do not ask people to believe my conclusions. *I ask they consider my arguments. Rhetoric is rhetoric and logic is logic and never the twain shall meet. You want tiresome, you got it: *Logic is part of rhetoric. * So are less reliable devices based on ethos and pathos. Have a nice life. Robert. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
AMD's 45nm technology compared against Intel's
tandrew wrote:
sad to see an argument Avoid usenet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA | NV55 | Intel | 0 | October 31st 07 12:21 AM |
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA | NV55 | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | October 31st 07 12:21 AM |
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA | NV55 | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | October 31st 07 12:21 AM |
GPU Computing: Intel's Larrabee - AMD's Fusion - NVIDIA's Tesla + CUDA | NV55 | Ati Videocards | 0 | October 31st 07 12:21 AM |
AMD's Athlon64 or Intel's P4? | [email protected] | General | 38 | February 8th 05 04:59 AM |