A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

XP OEM - Interesting conversation with MS employee



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old May 11th 05, 04:35 AM
NoStop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kurttrail wrote:

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
And different MS employees tell a different story about at what point
does upgrading components constitute a new and different computer.

Leythos you really should just give it up! The OP actually talked
to a MS employee and couldn't get a straight answer out of him. And
why is that? Because MS rather keep the FUD surrounding when
upgrading a computer turns it into another computer by defining it
in the EULA. MS KNOWS if pressed their POST EULA FUD is in no way
enforceable.


What part of "my personal" did you miss - Hell, I even stated your and
Alias's positions of being able to do anything you want.

I've not made a statement as to one or the other being fact in this
thread.


You still talk about the motherboard fantasy as it it is part of the
EULA.

IT IS NOT A PART OF THE EULA! It is only binding on you in your
delusions!

NOT ONE END USER EVER AGREED TO IT!

MS'S MOTHERBOARD NONSENSE HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY
AGREEMENT!


You can play lawyer all you want, but the reality is that 'dems with the
bucks make the rules. You want to take MickeyMouse on legally? Good luck!
Even the DOJ couldn't sustain a real challenge to MickeyMouse's illegal
activities. Gates has a war chest in the hundreds of millions of dollars to
do whatever he wants in the legal arena. It's just like the RIAA, when they
decide to slam a file sharer, most just cave in and settle out of court.

The reality is, MickeyMouse can determine what it considers significant
enough hardware changes to prevent a re-activation of the OS and thus force
the end-user to purchase a new license. So EULA at the end doesn't mean
squat. If you want to continue to be a slave of MickeyMouse you are forced
to play by MickeyMouse's rules. That's always the way it's been with MS and
always will be. Get over it! When you get fed up enough, you do have other
options.

Don't know whether you ever read chapter 7, but maybe you should ...

http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/...IhateMS_7.html

"Microsoft doesn't care where you want to go today. You'll go wherever
Microsoft tells you to go, period."

--

ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°øø¤º°`°ø,¸¸ ,ø¤º°`°ø
Windows is *NOT* a virus. Viruses are small and efficient.
A brief overview of Windows' most serious design flaws
http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/...IhateMS_A.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interesting Memo Brad Licatesi Dell Computers 13 March 31st 05 06:16 AM
Interesting benchmarks johns Ati Videocards 5 July 23rd 04 07:17 PM
HP an interesting article Mickey Printers 6 May 27th 04 05:13 PM
amd 64bits interesting? Kriss General 9 September 24th 03 09:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.