If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
do I really need a negative holder to scan with vuescan?
hi,
I'm thinking of gettng a scanner that is on the vuescan compatibility list. I want to scan some 4x5 b&w negatives. Could I just put the negative on the flatbed and scan it with that software, or would I have to have some kind of 4x5b negative holder? thanks, tracy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
... hi, I'm thinking of gettng a scanner that is on the vuescan compatibility list. I want to scan some 4x5 b&w negatives. Could I just put the negative on the flatbed and scan it with that software, or would I have to have some kind of 4x5b negative holder? thanks, tracy If the scanner has a transparency adapter, then the calibration slot must not be blocked. Otherwise you may not need a holder. If the scanner does not have a transparency adapter, putting the 4x5 on the glass with a white sheet of paper behind it will work in reflective mode. Not as good as a scanner with a 4x5 transparency capacity. -- CSM1 http://www.carlmcmillan.com -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 03:29:54 GMT, "CSM1"
wrote: wrote in message .. . hi, I'm thinking of gettng a scanner that is on the vuescan compatibility list. I want to scan some 4x5 b&w negatives. Could I just put the negative on the flatbed and scan it with that software, or would I have to have some kind of 4x5b negative holder? thanks, tracy If the scanner has a transparency adapter, then the calibration slot must not be blocked. Otherwise you may not need a holder. If the scanner does not have a transparency adapter, putting the 4x5 on the glass with a white sheet of paper behind it will work in reflective mode. Not as good as a scanner with a 4x5 transparency capacity. I guess I need to find out if there's a 4x5 transparency adapter for it. I'm looking at a HP 5300C right now. I kinda doubt it. thanks, tracy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I guess I need to find out if there's a 4x5 transparency adapter for
it. I'm looking at a HP 5300C right now. I kinda doubt it. Even if your flatbed does not have a transparency adaptor you can do what I did untill I got my Epson 2450 at Goodwill for $20.00. Here is the link: http://www.tom-elliott-photography.com/hp-scanner.html "They" said it couldn't be done and yet there is the proof it CAN be done if one is carefull and skillfull. The higher the optical resollution the better the results. In my case I did push things a bit and went for the highest interpolated resolution I could get. Have fun. Yours, Tom Elliott Photographer http://www.tom-elliott-photography.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:34:57 -0500, "Tom Ellliott"
wrote: Even if your flatbed does not have a transparency adaptor you can do what I did untill I got my Epson 2450 at Goodwill for $20.00. Here is the link: http://www.tom-elliott-photography.com/hp-scanner.html "They" said it couldn't be done and yet there is the proof it CAN be done if one is carefull and skillfull. The higher the optical resollution the better the results. In my case I did push things a bit and went for the highest interpolated resolution I could get. Have fun. Oh, wow. Well what if I just tape the negative to a light box, turn it upside down, and put the whole thing on any kind of flatbed scanner? Would that work? I already have a small/medium light box that was hand made. I am not looking to make a billboard from the negative. I just want to put the photos on my photo blog for friends. tracy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Flatbed scanners will not work attached to a light box because unless they
have transparency scanning capabilities there is no way to turn off the scanning light. Flatbed/transparency scanners can be had new for under $150: they scan 35mm ugly but are fine for your uses for 4x5 materials. Depending on the scanner and the condition of your film sometimes it seems necessary to put a piece of glass over the film to flatten it. Flatbeds do not autofocus so the further the material is off the glass the worse the results |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"bmoag" wrote in message ... Flatbed scanners will not work attached to a light box because unless they have transparency scanning capabilities there is no way to turn off the scanning light. Flatbed/transparency scanners can be had new for under $150: they scan 35mm ugly but are fine for your uses for 4x5 materials. Depending on the scanner and the condition of your film sometimes it seems necessary to put a piece of glass over the film to flatten it. Flatbeds do not autofocus so the further the material is off the glass the worse the results On top of not being able to turn off the light, Mains or AC powered light boxes have a 50 or 60 cycle flicker that show up in the scan as little black lines. -- CSM1 http://www.carlmcmillan.com -- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well.......
"bmoag" wrote in message ... Flatbed scanners will not work attached to a light box because unless they have transparency scanning capabilities there is no way to turn off the scanning light. Go here and see one that works: http://www.tom-elliott-photography.com/hp-scanner.html Also a few scans done with my hardware hack. Flatbed/transparency scanners can be had new for under $150: they scan 35mm ugly but are fine for your uses for 4x5 materials. After I did my hardware hack I got a Microtek 5900 with a 4x5 builtin trans adaptor. Then I had a little bit of luck and found an Epson 2450 with a 4x9 trans adaptor at Goodwill for $20.00!!!! I gave the original flatbed to my kids and I now have two flatbeds that work just fine for every thing from 35mm up to 4x5. Now if I need a better scan than these two have to offer then I get Kodaks ProPhotoCD scan. If one is carefull and knows how to use the hardware/software combintaion then rarely do you have to send out for either the ProPhotoCD or....a drum scan. Seeing is believeing and it is really too bad some of the nay sayers don't live here in the Miami area to see the brochures, newsletters, calendars, and sunday supliments I have done with the above equipment. I mean when I had my "little" Nikon 995 I shot corporate headshots. I now have a Nikon D70 and shoot raw. I have had art directors that were so against 35mm I would show the pictures first, then if they asked tell what the format was. As to 35 just look at National Geographic Magazine - the best example of fine 35mm work. So those of you out there on a limited hardware budget don't let the flammers - nay sayers and hardware snobs say it can't be done, because it can be done. Depending on the scanner and the condition of your film sometimes it seems necessary to put a piece of glass over the film to flatten it. Flatbeds do not autofocus so the further the material is off the glass the worse the results Complete agreement on that point. In fact I am looking for an AnitNewton glass to do just that, meanwhile I put the emulsion face down and flop in Photo Shop. Have fun and make pictures. Yours, Tom Elliott Photography |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
See my above posts and I never had the flicker problem with my hardware
hack. http://www.tom-elliott-photography.com/hp-scanner.html "CSM1" wrote in message om... "bmoag" wrote in message ... Flatbed scanners will not work attached to a light box because unless they have transparency scanning capabilities there is no way to turn off the scanning light. Flatbed/transparency scanners can be had new for under $150: they scan 35mm ugly but are fine for your uses for 4x5 materials. Depending on the scanner and the condition of your film sometimes it seems necessary to put a piece of glass over the film to flatten it. Flatbeds do not autofocus so the further the material is off the glass the worse the results On top of not being able to turn off the light, Mains or AC powered light boxes have a 50 or 60 cycle flicker that show up in the scan as little black lines. -- CSM1 http://www.carlmcmillan.com -- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:56:04 -0500, "Tom Ellliott"
well, I tried something pretty weird. I taped the negative to the glass, covered it with a piece of paper, and held a cheap clip-on lamp over it. It came out looking like an old tintype. it would be cool, if that was the look I was going for. tracy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
epson scan - do levels adjustment at scan time yield any more infothan post-scan level adjustments? | Alex Hunsley | Scanners | 0 | August 21st 04 02:36 AM |
HP4c / Desk Scan II Crashing Power Mac | David Yoder | Scanners | 0 | February 11th 04 04:51 PM |
Negative scan beginner: help! | Lew | Scanners | 10 | December 18th 03 10:10 AM |
Minolta 5400 & X-Pan | Robert Meyers | Scanners | 3 | November 18th 03 02:25 PM |
Nikon Scan 3.1.2 Problem: Thumbnails Tab Disappears (0/1) | A B | Scanners | 2 | November 17th 03 10:59 PM |