If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
132 Exchange Mailboxes + File data on NetApp FAS270
A vendor has proposed the Netapp 270 4TB Raw capacity for our Exchange +
File Server data. Can someone comment on the suitability for our environment based on my info below? Our fileserver has about 200 GB of documents, mostly files 100KB on it. I don't have current perfmon data on it to add to the discussion. I can tell you that 10 months ago, that amount of data was about 120GB so our data growth over the past year has been fairly rapid. Having little experience with SAN we are impressed with the ease of administration, the SnapManager for Exchange, Single Mailbox Recovery features. Here's a message from the vendor Fiber vs. ISCSI interface. ========= "For Exchange, perfmon shows about 14000 disk transfers/sec, which is less than a MB (a GigE link has a max capacity of 128MB/sec). Using a basic Exch formula (included below), even if we assume every IOP to be 8KB, you are doing about 2 MB/Sec. So I feel pretty comfortable with the idea of iSCSI, but again, if you want to go FCP we can do that. Formula: (Active User Count 113 / User Count 132 = 0.86 User Concurrency (Disk Transfers/sec 53/ User Count 132) * 0.86 User Concurrency = .35 IOPS ..35 IOPS * 20% overhead for peak = .42 IOPS (rounded)" ========== Thanks, Will |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
132 Exchange Mailboxes + File data on NetApp FAS270
Netapp does have a lot of capabilities, we especially like the
snapmanager for exchange. We have several dedicated FAS 980s for our exchange environment. The FAS 270 is very small in terms of cache, but very efficient in terms of write operations. The great thing is you can move up a tier from the F270 to a larger head with little downtime, simply the time it would take to move the data cables. Netapp has also gotten alot better in terms of not having to take downtime to add new fiber loops when you expand the storage array, though for the F270 you only have one loop I believe. NetApp is a NAS device with SAN capabilities, it's not a SAN per se, as it doesn't have the typical N+1 availability. If you can have service times of around 15 minutes every 3 to 6 months, I would look at NetApp. Also remember that the more snapshots you have, the deeper you can go in terms of recovering data. So you might have an hourly snapshot going for 24 hours, a daily for several weeks. It's the age of the snapshot which determines how much storage space it is going to use, not the number, so the appliance has several advantages there. Greg Will Niccolls wrote: A vendor has proposed the Netapp 270 4TB Raw capacity for our Exchange + File Server data. Can someone comment on the suitability for our environment based on my info below? Our fileserver has about 200 GB of documents, mostly files 100KB on it. I don't have current perfmon data on it to add to the discussion. I can tell you that 10 months ago, that amount of data was about 120GB so our data growth over the past year has been fairly rapid. Having little experience with SAN we are impressed with the ease of administration, the SnapManager for Exchange, Single Mailbox Recovery features. Here's a message from the vendor Fiber vs. ISCSI interface. ========= "For Exchange, perfmon shows about 14000 disk transfers/sec, which is less than a MB (a GigE link has a max capacity of 128MB/sec). Using a basic Exch formula (included below), even if we assume every IOP to be 8KB, you are doing about 2 MB/Sec. So I feel pretty comfortable with the idea of iSCSI, but again, if you want to go FCP we can do that. Formula: (Active User Count 113 / User Count 132 = 0.86 User Concurrency (Disk Transfers/sec 53/ User Count 132) * 0.86 User Concurrency = .35 IOPS .35 IOPS * 20% overhead for peak = .42 IOPS (rounded)" ========== Thanks, Will |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EMC to IBM SAN LUN replication | mackdaddy315 | Storage & Hardrives | 31 | October 25th 06 04:59 AM |
HP color laser $299 includes jetdirect ethernet card - extra toners NEW $20, also hp 8500 $700 8550n $950 | [email protected] | Printers | 2 | November 12th 05 05:40 PM |
DVD Burner Help..... | BigJim | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | August 2nd 05 06:29 AM |
aopen cdrw - 'session fixation error'? | c p | General | 0 | May 10th 05 08:47 PM |
Can't get CD Burner to Burn | Nottoman | General | 2 | December 22nd 03 05:47 PM |