A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FX5900XT = Pants?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 4th 04, 06:55 PM
Vic.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default FX5900XT = Pants?

Hi all.

Got my new build stable and happy, sorted out the temps
and got the MB drivers, graphics drivers & OS drivers (XP Pro)
bang up to date.

Biostar M7NCD
Athlon XP2600+
1 Gb pc2700 RAM
XfX FX5900XT 128 Mb Graphics Board.

Having now run 3DMark03, Halo and RTCW, I am disgusted
with the frame rates and quality.

Is the FX5900XT really so poor?

3D Mark came in around 4990, Halo was struggling to keep
30FPS going @ 1024x768x32bit, and even an old game like RTCW
was maxing out at about 90FPS @ 1024x768x32bit.

This doesn't bode well for Doom 3 & HL2!

Am I really going to have to shell out for a 6800 or a X800 if I want
to get decent performance with the long-awaited Valve & ID titles?
(Assuming they don't both turn out to be Duke Nukem Forever's)

Best,

Vic.
  #2  
Old May 4th 04, 08:02 PM
Cuzman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Vic." wrote in message
...

" Is the FX5900XT really so poor? "


See the comparison: http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20031229/index.html


  #3  
Old May 8th 04, 05:32 AM
Charles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are some things that the game HALO recommends you turn off. Did
you know that?


This is what Tom's Hardware said about HALO:

Since Gearbox, the developer of this game, strongly discourages the
use of FSAA and anisotropic filtering in its game, we only tested Halo
using the standard quality settings.


This benchmark may help:

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/...i-x800-29.html



Hi all.

Got my new build stable and happy, sorted out the temps
and got the MB drivers, graphics drivers & OS drivers (XP Pro)
bang up to date.

Biostar M7NCD
Athlon XP2600+
1 Gb pc2700 RAM
XfX FX5900XT 128 Mb Graphics Board.

Having now run 3DMark03, Halo and RTCW, I am disgusted
with the frame rates and quality.

Is the FX5900XT really so poor?

3D Mark came in around 4990, Halo was struggling to keep
30FPS going @ 1024x768x32bit, and even an old game like RTCW
was maxing out at about 90FPS @ 1024x768x32bit.

This doesn't bode well for Doom 3 & HL2!

Am I really going to have to shell out for a 6800 or a X800 if I want
to get decent performance with the long-awaited Valve & ID titles?
(Assuming they don't both turn out to be Duke Nukem Forever's)

Best,

Vic.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geforce FX5900XT or Radeon 9800 Pro? Moo General 5 November 15th 04 06:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.