Nero 6 burning slow..HELP

Using nero 6 latest, my 4x burning takes 30 minutes, not 15

Simulation takes 15 minutes, but actual write to disk takes 30.

I have two different burners, Sony DRU510 and the LG 4160

Operating system xp pro, svcpak2, 1 gig memory 3.2e intel.

The secondary ide is set to dma mode 2.

Tried three different movies from disk, made no difference in burning time.

Tried two different media, ridata and platinum.

This is a asus p4c800 intel 875 chipset.

This my new main machine, my bu machine has two similar drives and does
not do this with either media.

This has me confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

jerham wrote:
Using nero 6 latest, my 4x burning takes 30 minutes, not 15

Simulation takes 15 minutes, but actual write to disk takes 30.

I have two different burners, Sony DRU510 and the LG 4160

Operating system xp pro, svcpak2, 1 gig memory 3.2e intel.

The secondary ide is set to dma mode 2.

Tried three different movies from disk, made no difference in burning time.

Tried two different media, ridata and platinum.

This is a asus p4c800 intel 875 chipset.

This my new main machine, my bu machine has two similar drives and does
not do this with either media.

This has me confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

The problem with having us guess is that we are unluckly all to come up
with the same results - and therefore to have replies that can be
correlated.

1. Guessing, you're writing some sort of DVD, not a CD.
2. Guessing, both machines are running some version of Windows.
3. Can't guess: are the OSs the same (including SP)?
4. Can't guess: if you try writing at 2x, do you write at 2x?
5. Can't guess: what *is* different between the two machines?

Mike
--

http://www.mrichter.com/

Got no time to respond to this, Mikey?

========================
From: Curtis Croulet
Subject: had it with DirectCD
Date: 9/22/04

Mike Richter (Roxio ****) splattered:


Message-ID:
========================

Mike Richter (Slimy ****) splattered:

jerham wrote:
Using nero 6 latest, my 4x burning takes 30 minutes, not 15

Simulation takes 15 minutes, but actual write to disk takes 30.

I have two different burners, Sony DRU510 and the LG 4160

Operating system xp pro, svcpak2, 1 gig memory 3.2e intel.

The secondary ide is set to dma mode 2.

Tried three different movies from disk, made no difference in burning time.

Tried two different media, ridata and platinum.

This is a asus p4c800 intel 875 chipset.

This my new main machine, my bu machine has two similar drives and does
not do this with either media.

This has me confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

The problem with having us guess is that we are unluckly all to come up
with the same results - and therefore to have replies that can be
correlated.

1. Guessing, you're writing some sort of DVD, not a CD.
2. Guessing, both machines are running some version of Windows.
3. Can't guess: are the OSs the same (including SP)?
4. Can't guess: if you try writing at 2x, do you write at 2x?
5. Can't guess: what *is* different between the two machines?

Mike
--

http://www.mrichter.com/

Why would he ?

If you spoke to me like this, I'd just as soon beat the **** out of you than
answer you too.


::

"smh" wrote in message
...
Got no time to respond to this, Mikey?

========================
From: Curtis Croulet
Subject: had it with DirectCD
Date: 9/22/04

Mike Richter (Roxio ****) splattered:


Message-ID:
========================

Mike Richter (Slimy ****) splattered:

jerham wrote:
Using nero 6 latest, my 4x burning takes 30 minutes, not 15

Simulation takes 15 minutes, but actual write to disk takes 30.

I have two different burners, Sony DRU510 and the LG 4160

Operating system xp pro, svcpak2, 1 gig memory 3.2e intel.

The secondary ide is set to dma mode 2.

Tried three different movies from disk, made no difference in burning
time.

Tried two different media, ridata and platinum.

This is a asus p4c800 intel 875 chipset.

This my new main machine, my bu machine has two similar drives and
does
not do this with either media.

This has me confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

The problem with having us guess is that we are unluckly all to come up
with the same results - and therefore to have replies that can be
correlated.

1. Guessing, you're writing some sort of DVD, not a CD.
2. Guessing, both machines are running some version of Windows.
3. Can't guess: are the OSs the same (including SP)?
4. Can't guess: if you try writing at 2x, do you write at 2x?
5. Can't guess: what *is* different between the two machines?

Mike
--

http://www.mrichter.com/

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------
(Mike Richter, any Material Connection w/ Roxio?)

doc (Stupid ****) squawked:

Why would he ?

If you spoke to me like this, I'd just as soon beat the **** out of you than
answer you too.

(Aren't you supposed to be tired of reading my ****ed up messages,
Stupid ****?)

That's Curtis Croulet's response to this:

Mike Richter (Friggin ****):

"try providing some usable information - OS, what kind of write
you're doing, what error messages you get."


Got no time to respond to this, Mikey?

========================
From: Curtis Croulet
Subject: had it with DirectCD
Date: 9/22/04

Mike Richter (Roxio ****) splattered:


Message-ID:
========================

Mike Richter (Slimy ****) splattered:

jerham wrote:
Using nero 6 latest, my 4x burning takes 30 minutes, not 15

Simulation takes 15 minutes, but actual write to disk takes 30.

I have two different burners, Sony DRU510 and the LG 4160

Operating system xp pro, svcpak2, 1 gig memory 3.2e intel.

The secondary ide is set to dma mode 2.

Tried three different movies from disk, made no difference in burning time.

Tried two different media, ridata and platinum.

This is a asus p4c800 intel 875 chipset.

This my new main machine, my bu machine has two similar drives and does
not do this with either media.

This has me confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

The problem with having us guess is that we are unluckly all to come up
with the same results - and therefore to have replies that can be
correlated.

1. Guessing, you're writing some sort of DVD, not a CD.
2. Guessing, both machines are running some version of Windows.
3. Can't guess: are the OSs the same (including SP)?
4. Can't guess: if you try writing at 2x, do you write at 2x?
5. Can't guess: what *is* different between the two machines?

.. --------------------------------------
Mike Richter, were you born with
"Scam Artist" emblazoned on your face?
--------------------------------------

doc (Stupid ****) squawked:

Why would he ?
If you spoke to me like this, I'd just as soon beat the **** out of you than
answer you too.

(Aren't you supposed to be tired of reading my ****ed up messages,
Stupid ****?)

That's Curtis Croulet's response to this:

Mike Richter (Friggin ****):

"try providing some usable information - OS, what kind of write
you're doing, what error messages you get."


Got no time to respond to this, Mikey?

========================
From: Curtis Croulet
Subject: had it with DirectCD
Date: 9/22/04

Mike Richter (Roxio ****) splattered:

Message-ID:
========================


Mike Richter (Slimy ****) splattered:

The problem with having us guess is that we are unluckly all to come up
with the same results - and therefore to have replies that can be
correlated.

1. Guessing, you're writing some sort of DVD, not a CD.
2. Guessing, both machines are running some version of Windows.
3. Can't guess: are the OSs the same (including SP)?
4. Can't guess: if you try writing at 2x, do you write at 2x?
5. Can't guess: what *is* different between the two machines?