DAO vs TAO

While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference between TAO and
DAO, which will give best results (i.e., fewer errors) with (a) data
back-up, and (b) music?

Note: I only use single sessions and want a few seconds between songs, and I
want data to be as accurate as possible)?

David Rafky wrote:
While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference between TAO and
DAO, which will give best results (i.e., fewer errors) with (a) data
back-up, and (b) music?

There is no difference in error rate since the data are written the same
with either.

Mike
--

http://www.mrichter.com/

David Rafky wrote:

While I understand (conceptually, at least) the difference
between TAO and DAO, which will give best results (i.e.,
fewer errors) with (a) data back-up, and (b) music?

Note: I only use single sessions and want a few seconds
between songs, and I want data to be as accurate as
possible)?

As Mike pointed out, both work OK. But for audio always use DAO, or else
you might get some garbage-data between the tracks. In general, always use
DAO for everything, except when it's not possible (in which case your
burning program will not allow you to burn in DAO mode). For example, you
have to use DAO/96 mode to create real 1:1 copies of protected CDs.


--
Niko