Trouble booting now totally out of service

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:43:40 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:

kony wrote:

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:07:54 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:

Thanks, but I'll do that once I find out what's wrong with it. I was hoping
that the pattern of its failure would be familiar to someone here.

The pattern falls under the all-encompasing "something is
gradually getting less stable", up until the point where the
function had degraded enough to completely prevent
operation.

But I was smart enough to figure that part out all by myself. :-) I was hoping
that the gurus would have a better answer.

If you had a more unique failure mode, parhaps so- but yours
is a typical result that could have many causes.



That can be caused by many parts but most commonly
motherboard or power supply.

I had been secretly hoping that everything would point to the power supply
because I would pop the $$ for one if I could be reasonably certain. But a spare
unused power supply sitting on the shelf out in my garage because that wasn't
the problem isn't my idea of how to spend my money. Aren't there some voltage
test points that I could check now? The drawer on the CD drive must locked or
something as it won't open when I press the button. [yes the power is connected]

Unplug all non-essential parts. That should give best
chance for posting the system. Beyond a certain point it's
not worth the time to troubleshoot old parts.


The last attemp could be
pulling out the board and power, plus CPU, 1 memory module
and video, and trying this barebones combination alone on a
desktop. Then swap in a different power supply or
motherboard if possible.

I don't have all those spare parts sitting around even though I'm a packrat. I'd
have to buy them. Right now I have this PC-133 memory that I can't use anywhere
else, a Radeon that can be used, etc. It's a slow system by modern standards,
but my wife was happy with it, so I'd like to get it running again if it's not
too complicated.


Without the spare parts your best bet is to roll the dice
and see if you feel lucky.

You could unplug the power supply from AC for a few minutes,
open it up and examine for any visable signs of problems.
I'm not suggesting you take voltage readings inside- rather
that you not as that is a bit advanced and inherantly
dangerous for anyone not already inclined to do so- but many
failings are visually obvious, like vented capacitors, burnt
marks, a seized fan which slow-baked everything.

IMO, the best use of time at this point is buying a new
power supply, then if that doesn't help, deciding whether to
buy a compatible motherboard or to upgrade the whole
CPU/motherboard/memory combo. Generally when none of the
simplier tests reveals a problem, the technician then uses
process of elimination by swapping parts, else installing a
POST-card but that's yet another thing that would go sitting
unused later and you still wouldn't have replaced the faulty
part yet.

kony wrote:

I'm not suggesting you take voltage readings inside- rather
that you not as that is a bit advanced and inherantly
dangerous for anyone not already inclined to do so-

No problem with that. I've got an old Micronta multitester here that does the job.

but many
failings are visually obvious, like vented capacitors,

My apologies. As silly as it sounds, I didn't have the training to know what was
meant by that term when previously mentioned and what to be looking for until I got
off my _ and looked it up. http://www.answers.com/topic/capacitor-plague discusses
that and there are at least 6 of them on the MB that have the brown stains like the
picture at: http://www.pbase.com/flgator/image/42397665 and others that are bulging
at the top. I guess that would explain the whole thing and makes one wonder how it
held up for so long.

A new power supply would be prudent if I installed a new MB & CPU, so all I've really
got here is a mid-tower case, but at least one with a floppy drive. :-) But when I
can buy a new system with case for around $300, it probably doesn't make much sense
to spend the time and money on that upgrade for the type of use we make of a system.

Many thanks for the help!

Bob

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:27:15 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:

kony wrote:

I'm not suggesting you take voltage readings inside- rather
that you not as that is a bit advanced and inherantly
dangerous for anyone not already inclined to do so-

No problem with that. I've got an old Micronta multitester here that does the job.

but many
failings are visually obvious, like vented capacitors,

My apologies. As silly as it sounds, I didn't have the training to know what was
meant by that term when previously mentioned and what to be looking for until I got
off my _ and looked it up. http://www.answers.com/topic/capacitor-plague discusses
that and there are at least 6 of them on the MB that have the brown stains like the
picture at: http://www.pbase.com/flgator/image/42397665 and others that are bulging
at the top. I guess that would explain the whole thing and makes one wonder how it
held up for so long.

Yes, you have found the problem.



A new power supply would be prudent if I installed a new MB & CPU, so all I've really
got here is a mid-tower case, but at least one with a floppy drive. :-) But when I
can buy a new system with case for around $300, it probably doesn't make much sense
to spend the time and money on that upgrade for the type of use we make of a system.


Perhaps, but a new system for $300 may be a lot of
compromises. Often the benefit of such systems is if the
buyer didn't have the software they need yet, as careful
shopping can come close enough to same price-points but with
the concessions made on an individual basis, what benefits
you personally the most. For example, many people would be
better off with a $40 video card and higher-end hard drive,
than the next-step-up CPU.

kony wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:27:15 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:
A new power supply would be prudent if I installed a new MB & CPU, so all I've really
got here is a mid-tower case, but at least one with a floppy drive. :-) But when I
can buy a new system with case for around $300, it probably doesn't make much sense
to spend the time and money on that upgrade for the type of use we make of a system.

Perhaps, but a new system for $300 may be a lot of
compromises.

Yes and no, depending on what anyone might have built given free choice. I bought this
Compaq Presario in a hurry in December for $330 when the Athlon suddenly failed the first
time. I had to get *something* to replace it very quickly and didn't have the option of
building my own system to determine the packaging. The cpu & bus speed is ok with me
although I would have liked more than 256 memory. The onboard video is probably ok for my
purposes also although I may use one of those extra video cards now..

What I didn't like was paying for XP Home as part of the price when Compaq's oem version
is unusable and I now run Win2K. The CD/DVD drive would only read DVD's so I had to
replace that drive with a DVD burner. They had a cheap card reader in front where a floppy
drive belongs, so I installed a dual floppy from an old Pentium and my wife's HD is in the
card reader bay for the time being. The Bios doesn't even support the 5 1/4" B: drive. .
It's closer to what I wanted now, but those were the compromises.

Often the benefit of such systems is if the
buyer didn't have the software they need yet, as careful
shopping can come close enough to same price-points but with
the concessions made on an individual basis, what benefits
you personally the most. For example, many people would be
better off with a $40 video card and higher-end hard drive,
than the next-step-up CPU.

You're right about that. The Athlon had been a "build your own" from Fry's, although all I
needed to do was install the cpu (included), fan, memory, and agp video card. The point
being that, assuming I like the starting point, I had a free hand in what went into it. I
could do that again, assuming I found the right killer motherboard, with the right form
factor for that case, at the right price, and all. That may not be a good idea though, as
I sense that the ~2.5GHz single-cpu systems are now in an inventory clearance mode for
whatever is coming next. I might want to save my computing dollars for that, whatever it
is.

What might make sense, and would keep my spouse happy, is to somehow replace *only* this
bad motherboard with something as close to identical as possible so that everything else
would go along with it including the cpu, 640meg pc133 sdram, ati radeon. Even an unused
M805LR motherboard would be ok at the right price. I got 4 full years out of this one, so
I kid you not. Do you have any ideas on where I might find something like that?

Bob

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:05:42 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:

kony wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:27:15 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:
A new power supply would be prudent if I installed a new MB & CPU, so all I've really
got here is a mid-tower case, but at least one with a floppy drive. :-) But when I
can buy a new system with case for around $300, it probably doesn't make much sense
to spend the time and money on that upgrade for the type of use we make of a system.

Perhaps, but a new system for $300 may be a lot of
compromises.

Yes and no, depending on what anyone might have built given free choice. I bought this
Compaq Presario in a hurry in December for $330 when the Athlon suddenly failed the first
time. I had to get *something* to replace it very quickly and didn't have the option of
building my own system to determine the packaging. The cpu & bus speed is ok with me
although I would have liked more than 256 memory. The onboard video is probably ok for my
purposes also although I may use one of those extra video cards now..

What I didn't like was paying for XP Home as part of the price when Compaq's oem version
is unusable and I now run Win2K. The CD/DVD drive would only read DVD's so I had to
replace that drive with a DVD burner. They had a cheap card reader in front where a floppy
drive belongs, so I installed a dual floppy from an old Pentium and my wife's HD is in the
card reader bay for the time being. The Bios doesn't even support the 5 1/4" B: drive. .
It's closer to what I wanted now, but those were the compromises.

It may be possible to do without the OEM setup of the XP
home OS. Your OS license is valid for XP Home, if you
installed it clean by the standard methods you might be more
satisfied. However, I personally prefer Win2k as I don't
care for the GUI changes nor the "user-help" dummed-down XP
interface. I see XP vs 2K as a similar comparison of ME vs
98Se, and do choose 98SE over ME when possible (that is,
when the systems I've collected are licensed for it, I'd not
pay more for an additional 98SE license when a system
already has a ME license, rather disabling ME features till
it more closely resembled 98SE.


Often the benefit of such systems is if the
buyer didn't have the software they need yet, as careful
shopping can come close enough to same price-points but with
the concessions made on an individual basis, what benefits
you personally the most. For example, many people would be
better off with a $40 video card and higher-end hard drive,
than the next-step-up CPU.

You're right about that. The Athlon had been a "build your own" from Fry's, although all I
needed to do was install the cpu (included), fan, memory, and agp video card. The point
being that, assuming I like the starting point, I had a free hand in what went into it. I
could do that again, assuming I found the right killer motherboard, with the right form
factor for that case, at the right price, and all. That may not be a good idea though, as
I sense that the ~2.5GHz single-cpu systems are now in an inventory clearance mode for
whatever is coming next. I might want to save my computing dollars for that, whatever it
is.

Perhaps, but new technlogy always comes at a
price-disparity. Even existing technlogy in the market,
such as P4 CPU, has benefits reserved for those buying
hundreds of dollars worth of new software optimized for the
P4, far moreso than those reusing apps they already had.
Likewise for users of single-threaded applications, those
that aren't multitasking to the extent that they have 100%
utilization on a background task instead of the focused
task- for those people dual core has lesser benefits.



What might make sense, and would keep my spouse happy, is to somehow replace *only* this
bad motherboard with something as close to identical as possible so that everything else
would go along with it including the cpu, 640meg pc133 sdram, ati radeon. Even an unused
M805LR motherboard would be ok at the right price. I got 4 full years out of this one, so
I kid you not. Do you have any ideas on where I might find something like that?

Bob

I'm sure there are some out there, problem is finding them
as they're now old/cheap and as such, not advertised much
except at salvage/closeout type 'sites.

Upon relooking at a picture of your M805LR, I'm not at all
surprised that the capacitors vented, because I've seen VERY
many of the PCChips boards with that layout and era, have
capacitor failure. I would avoid another of same board, and
find you to be lucky to have used it successfully up until
this point in time- quite a few of them didnt' last more
than 2 years.

Does it need be the shorter, mATX form-factor or would full
ATX do as well? Depending on whether that is important,
reuse of the PC133 memory is limiting- might as well get
another KT133 (chipset based) board, preferribly from one of
the better manufacturers such as Asus, MSI, Gigabyte, or
Abit. For a large price difference you might consider
lesser brands but on parts this old the price difference may
be minimal.

There is a KT133 and a KT133A chipset. The latter
officially supporting 133MHz FSB, but either should be
compatible, AFAIK.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/a7pro.html


here's one that might work, but I"m not certain of it- I
leave it to you to research whether you need mATX and
whether your CPU needs a 133MHz FSB.
http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/ms6340.html

There may be others at the same 'site, keeping in mind that
you need KT133 or KT133A. There were some Sis chipset based
boards that would allow reuse of the PC133 memory, but none
that I recall in mATX form that seem any good.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/amdsomo.html

kony wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:05:42 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:
What I didn't like was paying for XP Home as part of the price when Compaq's oem version
is unusable and I now run Win2K.

It may be possible to do without the OEM setup of the XP
home OS. Your OS license is valid for XP Home, if you
installed it clean by the standard methods you might be more
satisfied.

But I'd have to have the standard retail CD to do that and there's no free path to getting that
that I know of. The way %@#& Compaq operates is that XP comes pre-installed and you have to
burn your own XP "recovery" CD(s), all 5 of them! Then, when you want to install it, it wipes
out the partition table and all your data in *all* partitions along with it. I found out the
hard way on my 250gig drive. That's not a good setup for someone with a multi-boot system
especially.

However, I personally prefer Win2k as I don't
care for the GUI changes nor the "user-help" dummed-down XP
interface.

Likewise exactly!

I see XP vs 2K as a similar comparison of ME vs
98Se, and do choose 98SE over ME when possible (that is,
when the systems I've collected are licensed for it, I'd not
pay more for an additional 98SE license when a system
already has a ME license, rather disabling ME features till
it more closely resembled 98SE.

In XP vs 2K there is also a big performance hit per my recent experience.

What might make sense, and would keep my spouse happy, is to somehow replace *only* this
bad motherboard with something as close to identical as possible so that everything else
would go along with it including the cpu, 640meg pc133 sdram, ati radeon. Even an unused
M805LR motherboard would be ok at the right price. I got 4 full years out of this one, so
I kid you not. Do you have any ideas on where I might find something like that?

I'm sure there are some out there, problem is finding them
as they're now old/cheap and as such, not advertised much
except at salvage/closeout type 'sites.

Upon relooking at a picture of your M805LR, I'm not at all
surprised that the capacitors vented, because I've seen VERY
many of the PCChips boards with that layout and era, have
capacitor failure. I would avoid another of same board, and
find you to be lucky to have used it successfully up until
this point in time- quite a few of them didnt' last more
than 2 years.

Does it need be the shorter, mATX form-factor or would full
ATX do as well?

I took some rough measurements and you're right about mATX.

Depending on whether that is important,
reuse of the PC133 memory is limiting-

That's ok as the idea is to keep cost down on this system and I'm sticking with the 1Ghz cpu
and putting the old ATI Radeo back in.

might as well get
another KT133 (chipset based) board, preferribly from one of
the better manufacturers such as Asus, MSI, Gigabyte, or
Abit. For a large price difference you might consider
lesser brands but on parts this old the price difference may
be minimal.

Thanks for the tip. I'll look around for those.

There is a KT133 and a KT133A chipset. The latter
officially supporting 133MHz FSB, but either should be
compatible, AFAIK.

If the "A" stands for the socket A then that's what it is. This does support 100 & 133MHz FSB,
but when I tried cranking it up from 100 to 133 early on there was some problem and I think it
was memory. Somehow I never got around to having the memory checked and had been running at
100, but just recently one of the sticks was coming up with an error. That's when I bought the
512 as I still had a system at that point.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/a7pro.html

here's one that might work, but I"m not certain of it- I
leave it to you to research whether you need mATX and
whether your CPU needs a 133MHz FSB.

That one is ATX Form Factor: 34.5 cm x 24.4 cm and mine is roughly 25 X 22. Was looking good up
until that point though.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/ms6340.html

Micro ATX Form Factor: 19.2cm x 24.4cm. Looks good vs 22 x 25 (24.4?) as long as the mounting
points line up.

There may be others at the same 'site, keeping in mind that
you need KT133 or KT133A. There were some Sis chipset based
boards that would allow reuse of the PC133 memory, but none
that I recall in mATX form that seem any good.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/amdsomo.html

That's great! You've put me on the right track. I don't expect much out of that system, just a
little more mileage and then she'll get this system when I find something else I really like.
If the Athlon is still running then, I'll give it to a relative.

Thanks again for the great help!

Bob

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:01:18 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:

kony wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:05:42 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:
What I didn't like was paying for XP Home as part of the price when Compaq's oem version
is unusable and I now run Win2K.

It may be possible to do without the OEM setup of the XP
home OS. Your OS license is valid for XP Home, if you
installed it clean by the standard methods you might be more
satisfied.

But I'd have to have the standard retail CD to do that and there's no free path to getting that
that I know of.

Borrow it from someone.
You are legally licensed to use the OS, it matters not where
you come upon the installation files- BUT your issued
activation key has to work, Simply trying an XP Home Retail
Disc may not work, nor would the license technically be
valid for it.


The way %@#& Compaq operates is that XP comes pre-installed and you have to
burn your own XP "recovery" CD(s), all 5 of them!

They don't even provide the QuickRestore CDs like they used
to? If that's the case, you're putting up with a lot to
save a few dozen dollars.


Then, when you want to install it, it wipes
out the partition table and all your data in *all* partitions along with it. I found out the
hard way on my 250gig drive. That's not a good setup for someone with a multi-boot system
especially.

When you make OS changes, such that windows needs some of
the installation files, does it prompt you to insert the
disc(s)? If it's reading those files from the HDD, you may
have most if not all of the WIndows files there on your
drive, which you could burn to a CD.




Does it need be the shorter, mATX form-factor or would full
ATX do as well?

I took some rough measurements and you're right about mATX.

Depending on whether that is important,
reuse of the PC133 memory is limiting-

That's ok as the idea is to keep cost down on this system and I'm sticking with the 1Ghz cpu
and putting the old ATI Radeo back in.

might as well get
another KT133 (chipset based) board, preferribly from one of
the better manufacturers such as Asus, MSI, Gigabyte, or
Abit. For a large price difference you might consider
lesser brands but on parts this old the price difference may
be minimal.

Thanks for the tip. I'll look around for those.

There is a KT133 and a KT133A chipset. The latter
officially supporting 133MHz FSB, but either should be
compatible, AFAIK.

If the "A" stands for the socket A then that's what it is. This does support 100 & 133MHz FSB,
but when I tried cranking it up from 100 to 133 early on there was some problem and I think it
was memory. Somehow I never got around to having the memory checked and had been running at
100, but just recently one of the sticks was coming up with an error. That's when I bought the
512 as I still had a system at that point.

No, KT133 boards were "supposed" to support 133MHz, but Via
never got them stable at that speed for FSB. The result was
that many boards actually had a 133MHz bios setting or
jumper setting to enable 133MHz FSB, but the boards couldn't
run at that speed no matter what CPU or memory was
installed. A typical upper limit for such boards was around
112MHz FSB, so if the memory were set to asynchronous +33
mode, then 145MHz for the memory- although generally it was
best to leave memory bus at synchronous speed to the FSB.

KT133A was solution to the 133MHz FSB problem of KT133, the
"A" simply meant it could run the 133MHz FSB. Otherwise
(IIRC) the board itself didn't need any physical changes,
only the chip that was soldered on, changed. There may've
been some other refinements made too, like bus signal
strengths, though these could be considered more of a design
refinement than a necessity for the chip change.

Given the choice, I'd go for the KT133A. Even if you don't
have the CPU running at 133FSB, it's not bad to have the
extra margin. The remaining issue I had was whether the
southbridge remained the same- which I don't remember. At
some point they switched from the 686B southbridge to
another series, and if that's the case it could be a problem
for windows to boot to the OS to plug-n-play everything
(what little there would be to do that too, minimal things
since for the most part the hardware would be the same).



http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/a7pro.html

here's one that might work, but I"m not certain of it- I
leave it to you to research whether you need mATX and
whether your CPU needs a 133MHz FSB.

That one is ATX Form Factor: 34.5 cm x 24.4 cm and mine is roughly 25 X 22. Was looking good up
until that point though.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/ms6340.html

Micro ATX Form Factor: 19.2cm x 24.4cm. Looks good vs 22 x 25 (24.4?) as long as the mounting
points line up.

They should line up, that's part of the mATX standard.

However, you might want to look at the rear of that Compaq
case to be sure it has a standard (or removable) rear IO
plate over the ports. I *think* your board uses a standard
plate but if the new board didn't, it would probalby come
with a new plate so your case would need have the removable
plate so you could replace it- other OEMs, notibly Gateway,
still used port holes that where stamped into the metal
instead of being removable.


There may be others at the same 'site, keeping in mind that
you need KT133 or KT133A. There were some Sis chipset based
boards that would allow reuse of the PC133 memory, but none
that I recall in mATX form that seem any good.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/amdsomo.html

That's great! You've put me on the right track. I don't expect much out of that system, just a
little more mileage and then she'll get this system when I find something else I really like.
If the Athlon is still running then, I'll give it to a relative.

Thanks again for the great help!

The system is fast enough and well enough endowed to be
quite suitable for general purpose use.... unlike prior
eras, the systems from the last 6 years or so will proably
be retired due to failures rather than lack of usefullness,
even if their present owners give them to someone with
lesser needs.

kony wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:01:18 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:
The way %@#& Compaq operates is that XP comes pre-installed and you have to
burn your own XP "recovery" CD(s), all 5 of them!

They don't even provide the QuickRestore CDs like they used
to? If that's the case, you're putting up with a lot to
save a few dozen dollars.

No CD's. You have to burn your own and they call those "Recovery CD's". The Fry's salesman said
there was a CD inside when I asked, but there wasn't one in the box when I opened it. If I hadn't
been trapped by the time constraints I mentioned, I would have returned the system when I learned
about that situation. Since I was really just interested in the h/w and not the OS, I let the whole
thing go.

Then, when you want to install it, it wipes
out the partition table and all your data in *all* partitions along with it. I found out the
hard way on my 250gig drive. That's not a good setup for someone with a multi-boot system
especially.

When you make OS changes, such that windows needs some of
the installation files, does it prompt you to insert the
disc(s)? If it's reading those files from the HDD, you may
have most if not all of the WIndows files there on your
drive, which you could burn to a CD.

Sure, they had to be there in order to burn the CD's, but that was several iterations ago. I see
what you're suggesting about custom-building my own installation CD and the files should also all be
there on the 5 CD's, but I'm too committed by now with all my software installations to change back,
plus I didn't even like XP. I have a "dead" XP installation still sitting there on drive 2 from the
last installation. It was booting fine until I added it to boot.ini along with Win2K & Linux and it
has never booted since, even from the Bios like it had been.

No, KT133 boards were "supposed" to support 133MHz, but Via
never got them stable at that speed for FSB. The result was
that many boards actually had a 133MHz bios setting or
jumper setting to enable 133MHz FSB, but the boards couldn't
run at that speed no matter what CPU or memory was
installed. A typical upper limit for such boards was around
112MHz FSB, so if the memory were set to asynchronous +33
mode, then 145MHz for the memory- although generally it was
best to leave memory bus at synchronous speed to the FSB.

KT133A was solution to the 133MHz FSB problem of KT133, the
"A" simply meant it could run the 133MHz FSB. Otherwise
(IIRC) the board itself didn't need any physical changes,
only the chip that was soldered on, changed. There may've
been some other refinements made too, like bus signal
strengths, though these could be considered more of a design
refinement than a necessity for the chip change.

That must have been the reason it wouldn't run at 133 then. I don't see 133A on anything including
the manual (They actually included a good manual back then!).

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/ms6340.html

Micro ATX Form Factor: 19.2cm x 24.4cm. Looks good vs 22 x 25 (24.4?) as long as the mounting
points line up.

They should line up, that's part of the mATX standard.

Ok. There are only square holes in the sheet metal behind the mb with metal clips coming through. I
guess that some of those are just the standoffs? and I see about 5 philips head screws on the cpu
side to hold the mb in?

However, you might want to look at the rear of that XXXAthlon
case to be sure it has a standard (or removable) rear IO
plate over the ports. I *think* your board uses a standard
plate but if the new board didn't, it would probalby come
with a new plate so your case would need have the removable
plate so you could replace it- other OEMs, notibly Gateway,
still used port holes that where stamped into the metal
instead of being removable.

There is definitely a rectangular plate there and not just the sheet metal.

There may be others at the same 'site, keeping in mind that
you need KT133 or KT133A. There were some Sis chipset based
boards that would allow reuse of the PC133 memory, but none
that I recall in mATX form that seem any good.

http://store.yahoo.com/justdeals/amdsomo.html

That's great! You've put me on the right track. I don't expect much out of that system, just a
little more mileage and then she'll get this system when I find something else I really like.
If the Athlon is still running then, I'll give it to a relative.

Thanks again for the great help!

The system is fast enough and well enough endowed to be
quite suitable for general purpose use.... unlike prior
eras, the systems from the last 6 years or so will proably
be retired due to failures rather than lack of usefullness,
even if their present owners give them to someone with
lesser needs.

That's the way I look at it! That first site was out of stock and I found a similar board that
might do the trick, but it's a refurb and I don't think I want anybody's old capacitors. The biggest
hangup is needing mATX as there are a fair number of ATX boards available all over including EBay.
I'll just keep on looking.

Thanks!

Bob

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:49:43 -0700, Robert Heiling
wrote:


They should line up, that's part of the mATX standard.

Ok. There are only square holes in the sheet metal behind the mb with metal clips coming through. I
guess that some of those are just the standoffs? and I see about 5 philips head screws on the cpu
side to hold the mb in?


Yes, some boards may use +-1 of those standoffs so when you
go to mount a different board you simply have to take note
of whether "all" holes match up- and move or remove a
standoff. It's a quicker way for them to mount boards than
using screw-in studs but in practice it makes no difference.
The majority of the holes are the same- it's mostly whether
the board has the 3rd column of holes due to being
extra-wide. If your present board isnt' that wide but the
new one is, AND if you dont' have any spare standoff clips,
one solution to that is picking up a few nylon friction-grip
type of standoff-insert, that merely holds the board away
from the case tray at that edge, as the remaining
screw-downs are sufficient to hold the board in place well
enough.



However, you might want to look at the rear of that XXXAthlon
case to be sure it has a standard (or removable) rear IO
plate over the ports. I *think* your board uses a standard
plate but if the new board didn't, it would probalby come
with a new plate so your case would need have the removable
plate so you could replace it- other OEMs, notibly Gateway,
still used port holes that where stamped into the metal
instead of being removable.

There is definitely a rectangular plate there and not just the sheet metal.

I figured there would be, most if not all of the Compaqs
I've seen from that era (except the slimline desktop types)
do have the removable IO shield.



The system is fast enough and well enough endowed to be
quite suitable for general purpose use.... unlike prior
eras, the systems from the last 6 years or so will proably
be retired due to failures rather than lack of usefullness,
even if their present owners give them to someone with
lesser needs.

That's the way I look at it! That first site was out of stock and I found a similar board that
might do the trick, but it's a refurb and I don't think I want anybody's old capacitors. The biggest
hangup is needing mATX as there are a fair number of ATX boards available all over including EBay.
I'll just keep on looking.


Newegg often has "refurbs" that are in good shape- customers
buy without realizing what they bought, perhaps that it used
PC133 memory instead of DDR. Others might be manufacturers
getting rid of stock held back to fulfill past-sales
warranty replacement programs, but now the warranty is over
for those. Others may not have worked due to user error and
are 100% fine and new boards. Others may have some defect
or damage though, but with newegg's great return policy it's
only a minor expense to return-ship the board.

Other sellers I can't vouch for, as I only buy refurbs from
Newegg. I do recall at least one place that sells stuff
that looked like it'd been kicked around in someone's
basement for a few years, though I hesitate to mention
their name.

There is an alternate way of finding older boards, go to the
manufacturer's website, like Gigabyte, Abit, MSI, Gigabyte,
Asus, and look through their support or product sections to
pick up the model names for the mATX KT133/133A based
boards, then you can Froogle ( http://www.google.com/frghp?
) or Pricewatch ( http://www.pricewatch.com/ ) search for
those specific model-names.

kony wrote:

Other sellers I can't vouch for, as I only buy refurbs from
Newegg. I do recall at least one place that sells stuff
that looked like it'd been kicked around in someone's
basement for a few years, though I hesitate to mention
their name.

There is an alternate way of finding older boards, go to the
manufacturer's website, like Gigabyte, Abit, MSI, Gigabyte,
Asus, and look through their support or product sections to
pick up the model names for the mATX KT133/133A based
boards, then you can Froogle ( http://www.google.com/frghp?
) or Pricewatch ( http://www.pricewatch.com/ ) search for
those specific model-names.

Many thanks for those installation tips and other good info.

I've located something that is in stock and looks to me to be very comparable with what I've got now. A
couple of possible concerns are the manufacturer and the vendor. I don't see them on your list and don't
know if that's conclusive. :-) I hope I can pick your brains a little more about this.

The one I found is the Biostar M7VKE Socket A at:
http://www.gearxs.com/gearxs/product_info.php?products_id=3624m Since the board I'm replacing is a
Chips & Technologies M805LR with VIA KT133 chipset, AMD Duron and Athlon Socket A, PC133 SDRAM up to 1
GB, and AGP 4X (AGP2.0), the specs are very close.

But possible concerns a
They only mention the VIA VT8365 chipset which is also used in the KT133, but that is only the
Northbridge portion of the whole set per http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/chipsets/legacy/km133/ and
I wonder what they use for the Southbridge portion and if the omission is hiding something.

"Supports up to 1024 MB SDRAM"; "Two 168-pin DIMM sockets" which is all correct, but I wonder why they
don't mention PC100/133 like everyone else has?

They just mention AGP slot without mentioning any specs.

Condition "PULLS", whatever definition they give to that term.

7 day return window, $8.95 for a 1 year warrantee. Guess it's really a $39.95 mb. :-) 7 days is too
close for my taste given that there are other unknowns with this system in getting it up & running.

All in all, they are sort of loose and lack the type of precision in describing their products that most
of the other websites I've seen have. They don't even give the board dimensions except to say mATX.

Maybe I'm too cautious.

Bob