A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage & Hardrives
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

which RAID level for write only?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 29th 03, 10:00 AM
Bill Todd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"idunno" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Todd" wrote in message

...

For small writes, a classic RAID-3 implementation may be slightly faster
because its spindles are synchronized (and the mirrored spindles in

RAID-10
typically aren't, so the write there will take take the longer of the

two
disk access times). But if the RAID-10 controller has stable write-back
cache such that it can queue up write requests and execute them in

optimal
order, any such advantage may be reduced or eliminated (as it will be

for
large writes in any event, where the access times become a smaller
percentage of the overall overhead).

But that's for purely serial small writes. For multiple small writes
requested in parallel, RAID-10 may well be able to process at least some

of
them in parallel, whereas RAID-3 will serialize them at the parity disk
(though should at least be able to queue-optimize their execution).

RAID-10, of course, provides potentially significantly better *read*
performance for a given usable capacity. It also provides somewhat

better
availability, since with RAID-3 (or -5) the loss of any two disks

results in
data loss whereas with RAID-10 data is lost only if the two disks happen

to
be partners.

- bill


Thank you. That helps. Are these performance differences maintained
when you enable spindle sync on a RAID 10 array with a large
write-back cache?


Hmmm. Most people with read-dominated workloads would likely consider
unsynched spindles a *feature* of RAID-10, since they'd get the faster of
the two potential read options (at least if the array were suave) at only
small expense in write performance. But if the array allows the option of
synching the spindles for RAID-10 operation, and if you're performing only
writes (so that the heads can be presumed to be in the same position on both
mirror partners before each write request - at least I hope you could
presume that), then I can't think of any situation off the top of my head in
which the RAID-10 array wouldn't equal the speed of the RAID-3 array, and
for parallel write operations it might well be superior (with the large
write-back cache, even somewhat larger writes might be able to achieve some
parallelism, though you're still going to have a hard limit of half the
aggregate streaming bandwidth of the disks - the same value as the limit for
a RAID-3 array of equal usable capacity, assuming that its parity generator
can keep up).

- bill



  #12  
Old September 29th 03, 10:12 AM
idunno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Compelling...

thanks again
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IDE RAID Ted Dawson Asus Motherboards 29 September 21st 04 03:39 AM
Need help with SATA RAID 1 failure on A7N8X Delux Cameron Asus Motherboards 10 September 6th 04 11:50 PM
Asus P4C800 Deluxe ATA SATA and RAID Promise FastTrack 378 Drivers and more. Julian Asus Motherboards 2 August 11th 04 12:43 PM
Gigabyte GA-8KNXP and Promise SX4000 RAID Controller Old Dude Gigabyte Motherboards 4 November 12th 03 08:26 PM
DAW & Windows XP RAID Tips, ProTools error -9086 Giganews Asus Motherboards 0 October 24th 03 06:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.