A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage & Hardrives
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fastest workstation storage



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 24th 05, 10:51 PM
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

..::SuperBLUE::. wrote:

39320 is not a RAID controller...

http://www.geizhals.at/eu/?cat=sccraid&sort=p


Depends on your definition. It appears to be host-based, in other words
it's software RAID only with BIOS support for boot.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
  #12  
Old April 24th 05, 11:56 PM
Folkert Rienstra
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter" wrote in message
Hello,
I am looking for fastest raid 0 storage solution for a workstation. Is
Adaptec 39320 controler + 6 Fujitsu mas 36gb 15000 rpm drives u 320 the
fastest i could get or is there something else, faster? Thanks


Fast is a generic term. Be more specific.


Fast RAID for a database, web server or a streaming application
requires a different selection criteria.


Oh? How so?
  #13  
Old April 25th 05, 12:12 AM
Neill Massello
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

..::SuperBLUE::. wrote:

This workstation is used for various 35mm film and hdtv video production
effects.


So you need fast reads and writes on large files, but not extremely fast
access. For this application, the high (15k) rpm drives you mentioned
won't provide much additional benefit to offset their high cost.

  #14  
Old April 25th 05, 01:19 AM
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:

You could possibly use software RAID0 solution,


That is what all RAID is, software.
The only difference is where this software runs on/runs in,
whether that's a dedicated processor, bios+driver or driver only.


Software RAIDs are often more reliable and better coded then hardware
ones. The Linux community or Veritas Corp (MS licensed the lite version of
Veritas's VxVM to Windows as "Dynamic Disk") can produce better code then
the small company with small development bugdets and heavy time-to-market
requirements.

The only drawbacks of the software RAID are a) hardships in some OSes like
Windows in booting from it - Windows can boot from mirror only, not from
stripe or span set or RAID5 b) RAID5 checksum calculation is done by the
host CPU, which is slow.

If one does not use RAID5, but uses mirror - then I see no advantages in
hardware RAID.


Unless your main process is CPU-bound.


--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
  #15  
Old April 25th 05, 01:47 AM
Maxim S. Shatskih
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You could possibly use software RAID0 solution,

That is what all RAID is, software.
The only difference is where this software runs on/runs in,
whether that's a dedicated processor, bios+driver or driver only.


Software RAIDs are often more reliable and better coded then hardware ones. The
Linux community or Veritas Corp (MS licensed the lite version of Veritas's VxVM
to Windows as "Dynamic Disk") can produce better code then the small company
with small development bugdets and heavy time-to-market requirements.

The only drawbacks of the software RAID are a) hardships in some OSes like
Windows in booting from it - Windows can boot from mirror only, not from stripe
or span set or RAID5 b) RAID5 checksum calculation is done by the host CPU,
which is slow.

If one does not use RAID5, but uses mirror - then I see no advantages in
hardware RAID.

--
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP
StorageCraft Corporation

http://www.storagecraft.com


  #16  
Old April 25th 05, 02:44 AM
Nick Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My experiments with Win2003 server backed by EMC CX-700 (2Gbit
fibre-channel) show that best throughput was achieved with hardware RAID-10
sets striped in software so that multiple LUNs were visible to the OS. With
a 2Tb drive created from five 400Gb RAID-10 sets each consisting of six
133Gb drives, throughput was several hundred percent better than with the
RAID-10 all done in hardware and only presenting a single LUN to the OS.
OTOH, with Win2000 as the OS the software striping gave no appreciable
advantage over the hardware striping.

My testing was done with the MS Loadsim 2003 stress test tool for simulating
a production Exchange environment.

Nick


  #17  
Old April 25th 05, 03:04 AM
Eric Gisin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Folkert Rienstra" wrote in message
eenews.net...
"Eric Gisin" wrote in message


Don't be stupid. Hardware RAID is of no benefit on the desktop,

especially
from Adaptec.

If you do not have PCI-X, the fastest (STR) available is RAID 0 on

Intel's
i9XX and nForce4 SATA2.

If you want a fast workstation, get a 15K SCSI OS drive, and IDE for

data.

And you said "Don't be stupid"?

This is an A/V workstation. 7200 IDE has taken over 10K SCSI in this
application, because of price and drive capacity.

4 IDE drives will do 300MB/s today, an Ultra320 channel is less.

Tell us Folknuts, what would you recommend? Or are you just going to troll?


  #18  
Old April 25th 05, 03:43 AM
Bill Todd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maxim S. Shatskih wrote:

....

If one does not use RAID5, but uses mirror - then I see no advantages in
hardware RAID.


Well, if your controller has even a very small amount of NVRAM in which
to record current write operations, the hardware approach can avoid the
need to perform a complete mirror resynch after something as common as a
power failure (even when such software resynchs are done in the
background, they consume disk performance resources). And if your
controller has somewhat more (preferably mirrored) NVRAM, it can perform
some significant write-back optimizations on the write stream (while
significantly improving perceived write latency in the process).

Other than that, and avoiding the additional processor interrupts and
bus and memory activity which software mirroring requires, I agree.

- bill
  #19  
Old April 25th 05, 03:53 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

U comp.periphs.scsi Eric Gisin prica:
4 IDE drives will do 300MB/s today, an Ultra320 channel is less.


Well, to tell you the truth... RAID0 over 12 Hitachi 160GB/8MB 7K250 drives
(SATA), on 3Ware 9500S-12 SATA RAID controller, and I could get 350MB/s read
and 210MB/s write speed... How the heck could you get 300MB/s on 4 ATA
drives?!!!!!

3Ware 9500S-12, 128MB cache, PCI-X 66MHz
12x Hitachi 7K250, 160GB/8MB, 64kb stripe size

The machine was a video-capture workstation... Tested with BlackMagic Design
software for video-capture speed testing... Capture card was BlackMagic
Design DectLink Extreme IIRC...


--
Opekaa gura u kantini ekonomije divovski dorucaku ugnjetavu
danima. By runf

Damir Lukic,
a member of hr.comp.hardver FAQ-team
  #20  
Old April 25th 05, 03:55 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

U comp.periphs.scsi Folkert Rienstra prica:
39320 is not a RAID controller...

Yes, it is. Just not an all purpose one.


? Hmmm? 39320 is, accoring to Adaptec's support page plain SCSI HBA... RAID?
Sorry, I couldn't find any RAID funcion in it... Any links?

You could possibly use software RAID0 solution,

That is what all RAID is, software.
The only difference is where this software runs on/runs in,
whether that's a dedicated processor, bios+driver or driver only.


OK, I get your point...

but I don't recommend it...

Who cares what you recommend.


Well, yes, who cares?

Second... What kind of speed you need? Fast read, write, seek?

Do you always have to ask questions that the post already answers?


I intend to get as much info as possible...


--
"Izbacens li beogradjaninu vjesu ?" upita eurokremo tuce pajseru ubiju.
"Nisam ja nikog bombardiro !" rece kondoma pozdravlja "Ja samo rukometasu guru blesavm !"
By runf

Damir Lukic,
a member of hr.comp.hardver FAQ-team
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SAN (Storage Area Network) Security FAQ Revision 2004/10/30 - Part 1/1 Will Spencer Storage & Hardrives 0 October 30th 04 08:35 AM
Enterprise Storage Management (ESM) FAQ Revision 2004/06/23 - Part 1/1 Will Spencer Storage & Hardrives 0 June 23rd 04 06:58 AM
Enterprise Storage Management (ESM) FAQ Revision 2004/04/11 - Part 1/1 Will Spencer Storage & Hardrives 0 April 11th 04 07:24 AM
Enterprise Storage Management (ESM) FAQ Revision 2004/02/16 - Part 1/1 Will Spencer Storage & Hardrives 0 February 16th 04 10:23 PM
Terabyte Storage By Real-Storage Real-Storage Storage & Hardrives 2 October 23rd 03 04:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.