A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Building Computer, need advice, please.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 28th 04, 03:16 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Building Computer, need advice, please.

Hi folks,

I'm about to start putting together my fourth build, and I'm at the point
where I can use mucho advice. The new mchine will be primarily for CPU-
intensive stuff, such as high quality audio compression and editing or
high definition fractals, and also general "house-office" stuff. I'm not
much into games or fast 3-D video, and am not planning to overclock, or
not extensively.

My present two year old machine, which is getting ncreasingly ragged
around the edges, has a Soyo KT400 Dragon and Athlon 1400. I am looking
for a decent real world speed improvement, but without the hassles of
building to the cutting edge. My highest priority is a stable and trouble
free machine made up of tried and tested components. Speed is my next
highest priority. Third priority is a quiet system. My budget can stand
some moderate upgrading of the components below, if it will mean a better
machine.

Here is my first and very tentative approximation of how to go about it.

Thank you all very much for any input and recommendations about better
alternatives, and for pointing out any bottleneck or overkill.

MOTHERBOARD:
ABIT NF7-S
or ASUS A7N8X-E DELUXE Rev.2.0 ?
(or possibly GIGABYTE GA-7N400 Pro2 ?)
CPU:
Barton XP2800
(or XP2500 OC to FSB 400 ?)
MEMORY: 2x512MB DDR400 operating as dual channel,
HD: Hitachi 250GB 7200RPM
DVD WRITER: Dual Layer, 12X or 16X
FLOPPY/MEMORY CARD READER: MITSUMI FA404A
VIDEO CARD: Chaintech FX20 (GeForce 5200, 128MB)
CASE: EVERCASE E4252

CPU SINK/FAN:
Speeze WHISPER ROCK II, #5F263B1M3G (2700rpm, 38CFM, 26.5dB)
or Speeze "FALCONROCK" #5F286B (2300rpm, 28cfm, 25db)
CASE FANS:
Back: 12cm, NMB 4710NL-04W-B29 (72cfm, 30dB, will use at 7V)
Front: 8cm: Speeze FDC08025S1M, (37.8cfm, 25.0 DB)

--- already have: ---
POWER SUPPLY: Pc Power and Cooling, 410W
HD #2: Hitachi 120GB
SOUND CARD: Revolution 7.1
WinXP SP1 Pro
  #2  
Old August 28th 04, 12:39 PM
Dave C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


building to the cutting edge. My highest priority is a stable and trouble
free machine made up of tried and tested components. Speed is my next
highest priority. Third priority is a quiet system. My budget can stand
some moderate upgrading of the components below, if it will mean a better
machine.

Here is my first and very tentative approximation of how to go about it.

Thank you all very much for any input and recommendations about better
alternatives, and for pointing out any bottleneck or overkill.

MOTHERBOARD:
ABIT NF7-S
or ASUS A7N8X-E DELUXE Rev.2.0 ?
(or possibly GIGABYTE GA-7N400 Pro2 ?)
CPU:
Barton XP2800
(or XP2500 OC to FSB 400 ?)
MEMORY: 2x512MB DDR400 operating as dual channel,
HD: Hitachi 250GB 7200RPM
DVD WRITER: Dual Layer, 12X or 16X
FLOPPY/MEMORY CARD READER: MITSUMI FA404A
VIDEO CARD: Chaintech FX20 (GeForce 5200, 128MB)
CASE: EVERCASE E4252


OK, you have some goals that conflict with each other, and some components
that conflict with your goals. If your power supply is fairly new and has
SATA and P4 connectors like this one he

http://www.pcpowercooling.com/produc...cers/index.htm

Then that's a good start. Otherwise, I'd suggest a newer power supply.
It's generally not a good idea to recycle a power supply into a new system,
as the power supply is the most frequent failure point, and it is the only
component that is likely to "kill" other components WHEN (not if) it fails.

Stability is your first priority, but oddly you are entertaining the idea of
possibly overclocking. You can have stability or overclocking, one OR the
other. Don't listen to the idiots who will scream that it's possible to do
both. (don't count on being that lucky . . . )

Speed is your 2nd priority, but you are looking at possibly going from
Athlon XP to Athlon XP. Generally, an increase in clock speed will not
translate to a noticeably faster system. If you're going to spend money on
an upgrade, do it in a way that will translate to a faster system.

Quiet is your third goal, but if you stick with the Athlon XP platform
(don't do it), you've already honed in on two motherboards that have really
noisy cooling fans on their northbridge chipsets. A fan on the northbridge
is not necessary, not even for overclocking (which you are NOT going to do,
RIGHT?!?), and it just adds tons of noise to the system. Choose a mainboard
that is passively cooled, you will have plenty of choice there.

If you want to accomplish your goal of higher speed, you need to set your
sights just a tad higher. Look for an 800FSB P4 processor on just about ANY
(passively cooled) motherboard that will handle it. Or if your budget can
stretch that far, jump straight to an Athlon 64 in the ~3200 ~3500 range.
Again, for the Athlon64, find a passively cooled mainboard. While your
choice of video card was a good match for the system you originally
envisioned, it would be somewhat of a bottleneck for anything faster. I'd
suggest something like the Sappire Radeon 9600 or Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT
(be sure to get a passively cooled one!). While those aren't cutting edge
either, they won't be quite as much of a bottleneck as a 5200. Plus, they
are silent. Just be aware that different versions exist, and choose one
without a cooling fan. -Dave


  #3  
Old August 28th 04, 05:39 PM
Dave C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave, you need to educate yourself
on a topic before calling people idiots.
--
Mac Cool


If fifteen bazillion people do something stupid, that doesn't mean it's a
good idea for you to do it, also. If someone is looking for stability, they
should NOT be overclocking. Unfortunately, lots of people will probably
advise them to do JUST that. -Dave


  #4  
Old August 28th 04, 05:50 PM
Mac Cool
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

said:

The new mchine will be primarily for CPU- intensive stuff, such as
high quality audio compression and editing or high definition
fractals, and also general "house-office" stuff. I'm not much into
games or fast 3-D video, and am not planning to overclock, or not
extensively.

My present two year old machine ... Athlon 1400.


This was outdated two years ago.

MOTHERBOARD:


MSI K8N NEO Platinum

CPU: Barton XP2800 (or XP2500 OC to FSB 400 ?)


Bump up to an Athlon64 3000+ or 3200+
--
Mac Cool
  #5  
Old August 29th 04, 12:17 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave C. wrote:

Dave, you need to educate yourself
on a topic before calling people idiots.
--
Mac Cool



If fifteen bazillion people do something stupid, that doesn't mean it's a
good idea for you to do it, also. If someone is looking for stability, they
should NOT be overclocking. Unfortunately, lots of people will probably
advise them to do JUST that. -Dave



Another case of knowing how to do something making all the difference.

When done properly, overclocked machines are just as stable as any other
system.

  #6  
Old August 29th 04, 12:30 AM
JK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



David Maynard wrote:

Dave C. wrote:

Dave, you need to educate yourself
on a topic before calling people idiots.
--
Mac Cool



If fifteen bazillion people do something stupid, that doesn't mean it's a
good idea for you to do it, also. If someone is looking for stability, they
should NOT be overclocking. Unfortunately, lots of people will probably
advise them to do JUST that. -Dave



Another case of knowing how to do something making all the difference.

When done properly, overclocked machines are just as stable as any other
system.


Are you saying that processor makers are arbitrary and capricious when
assigning processor ratings? There are reasons for those ratings. There
are also reasons for assigning spped limits on roads. While someone
might be able to drive somewhat above the speed limit without having
an accident, the probability of an accident occuring is greater if they
exceed the speed limit.


  #7  
Old August 29th 04, 12:52 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JK wrote:


David Maynard wrote:


Dave C. wrote:


Dave, you need to educate yourself
on a topic before calling people idiots.
--
Mac Cool


If fifteen bazillion people do something stupid, that doesn't mean it's a
good idea for you to do it, also. If someone is looking for stability, they
should NOT be overclocking. Unfortunately, lots of people will probably
advise them to do JUST that. -Dave



Another case of knowing how to do something making all the difference.

When done properly, overclocked machines are just as stable as any other
system.



Are you saying that processor makers are arbitrary and capricious when
assigning processor ratings?


No, I didn't say that and there's nothing 'arbitrary' or 'capricious' about it.

While there are no guarantees, both Intel and AMD routinely sell processors
with speed ratings below the actual capability of the chip.

There are reasons for those ratings.


Yes there are. Many, in fact, over a range of considerations, of which
clock speed is only one, and part of the overclocking art is knowing what
they are and the tradeoffs involved.

There
are also reasons for assigning spped limits on roads. While someone
might be able to drive somewhat above the speed limit without having
an accident, the probability of an accident occuring is greater if they
exceed the speed limit.


Fortunately, processors are not automobiles driven by error prone humans on
a than perfect road system.


  #8  
Old August 29th 04, 02:15 AM
Dave C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Another case of knowing how to do something making all the difference.

When done properly, overclocked machines are just as stable as any other
system.


If your mechanic tells you not to start your engine with no oil in it, WOULD
YOU? Now what if 15 bazillion other drivers swore up and down that it was
OK to start an engine with no oil in it, and that it runs just fine that
way? Hobbyists like to overclock because they don't know any better. How
do you tell the hacks from the pros? See who advises you to overclock and
who advises you to build a faster computer if that's what you need. Now YOU
guess who the professional is. Hint: It aint the guy telling you to start
your engine with no oil in it, and it for god damned sure isn't the guy
telling you that overclocking is OK because you CAN have a stable system "if
you know how". You won't find anyone with any degree of hardware knowledge
(REAL hardware knowledge) overclocking a system. I don't have to wonder
why, but maybe you should think about that. -Dave


  #9  
Old August 29th 04, 04:05 AM
David Maynard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave C. wrote:

Another case of knowing how to do something making all the difference.

When done properly, overclocked machines are just as stable as any other
system.



If your mechanic tells you not to start your engine with no oil in it, WOULD
YOU? Now what if 15 bazillion other drivers swore up and down that it was
OK to start an engine with no oil in it, and that it runs just fine that
way?


No. Now you tell me why you ask silly irrelevant questions.

Hobbyists like to overclock because they don't know any better. How
do you tell the hacks from the pros? See who advises you to overclock and
who advises you to build a faster computer if that's what you need. Now YOU
guess who the professional is.


I always get a kick out of people who define "professional" as 'the ones
who agree with me'.

Hint: It aint the guy telling you to start
your engine with no oil in it, and it for god damned sure isn't the guy
telling you that overclocking is OK because you CAN have a stable system "if
you know how". You won't find anyone with any degree of hardware knowledge
(REAL hardware knowledge) overclocking a system.


You're wrong.

I don't have to wonder
why, but maybe you should think about that. -Dave


While you're wondering maybe you should also wonder about learning
something of, as you put it, "REAL hardware knowledge."


  #10  
Old August 29th 04, 06:08 AM
heartofBruce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hey David Maynard,
are you the David I know? Do you work in the MSSG?

==============
Posted through www.HowToFixComputers.com/bb - free access to hardware troubleshooting newsgroups.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Off Topic - Lou Costello buys a computer :J:W:B: General 0 September 1st 04 03:37 PM
Moms new computer....advice? rferoni Homebuilt PC's 10 December 9th 03 09:38 PM
How to Fix Your Computer Ben Dellar Overclocking AMD Processors 4 November 12th 03 02:39 AM
Computer upgrade advice wanted please. Gary McQueen Homebuilt PC's 1 August 30th 03 10:36 AM
New Computer Building Suggestions Yifei Chen General 5 June 30th 03 10:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.