If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
No real details here, just a "stay tuned" message, but that should be
enough to start wild speculations running. "One strategic path that will knock you for a loop, and which I'll detail soon, is AMD's coming escape from the confines of Intel's x86 instruction set. To this point, AMD has resisted the temptation to overhaul the x86, even though it sorely needs it. When Fab 36 cranks up, AMD will overcome that fear. AMD64 processors will take on performance, scalability, resource management, and availability-related instruction set extensions that will be proprietary to AMD CPUs. Don't freak out: AMD will keep its contract to be 100 percent compatible with Intel-standard processors. But the idea of seeing "optimized for AMD64" stamped on software boxes delights me. " http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/...rss&url=http:/ /www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/26/44OPcurve_1.html or, http://tinyurl.com/cvvwn I'll start off with my own wild speculation. There was word that prior to choosing SSE2/SSE3 as its AMD64 floating point instruction set, AMD was investigating going its own way. So I'm going to speculate that AMD will extend floating point out with its previously abandonned instruction set. I'm going to speculate that this instruction set will be a full scientific functions instruction set, just like the old x87 FPU was, except without the stack-based register system. And let's say it'll have 32 FP registers instead of just 16 like SSE does. Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
Keith R. Williams wrote:
You mean like PowerPC has had for years? ;-) Maybe they'll do VMX. Wouldn't that be a kick! ;-)) That would certainly make it very appealing to Apple all of a sudden, I would guess. However, the real kicker here is that AMD is attempting something here that only Intel or Microsoft usually ever try to do, which is embrace, extend, and extinguish. Another wild possibility is that AMD might open up its internal RISC implementation to direct access by applications. They used to allow that sort of thing on the K5 processor, but stopped it as of K6 onwards. Yousuf Khan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
On 26 Oct 2005 08:17:17 -0700, "YKhan" wrote:
No real details here, just a "stay tuned" message, but that should be enough to start wild speculations running. "One strategic path that will knock you for a loop, and which I'll detail soon, is AMD's coming escape from the confines of Intel's x86 instruction set. To this point, AMD has resisted the temptation to overhaul the x86, even though it sorely needs it. When Fab 36 cranks up, AMD will overcome that fear. AMD64 processors will take on performance, scalability, resource management, and availability-related instruction set extensions that will be proprietary to AMD CPUs. Don't freak out: AMD will keep its contract to be 100 percent compatible with Intel-standard processors. But the idea of seeing "optimized for AMD64" stamped on software boxes delights me. " http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/...rss&url=http:/ /www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/26/44OPcurve_1.html or, http://tinyurl.com/cvvwn I'll start off with my own wild speculation. There was word that prior to choosing SSE2/SSE3 as its AMD64 floating point instruction set, AMD was investigating going its own way. So I'm going to speculate that AMD will extend floating point out with its previously abandonned instruction set. I'm going to speculate that this instruction set will be a full scientific functions instruction set, just like the old x87 FPU was, except without the stack-based register system. And let's say it'll have 32 FP registers instead of just 16 like SSE does. Yousuf Khan Not sure if it will fly. Remember 3dnow and lowly K6/2 beating then-top of the line P2 at Quake because of 3dnow optimization? Then, about a year later, came out P3 with SSE, and everyone started doing SSE optimization. 3dnow was forgotten quite soon, even though both instruction sets were pretty similar, and AMD was about a year ahead. As long as AMD market share stays where it is now (just under 20% overall IIRC) few will bother to do AMD optimization. Besides, Intel might counter this move with another installment of SSE that essentially copies AMD instructions but is different enough to make SSEx optimized code not compatible with AMD. _If_ AMD market share goes above 30% as it is hoped, and also _if_ AMD will be significantly ahead of Intel releasing it, and also _if_ the new instruction set gets the backing of some software heavyweights (just as MS put its weight behind x86-64), then it might happen. But then Intel today is not as strong as Intel back in 1998, and if the chain of major screw-ups by Intel continues, AMD may get a fighting chance. NNN |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
In article . com,
YKhan wrote: ... Another wild possibility is that AMD might open up its internal RISC implementation to direct access by applications. They used to allow that sort of thing on the K5 processor, Can you speak a little more to how this was done? IIRC (and my recollection isn't too good), the K5 used a similar core to the AMD29000. I didn't know there was a way for it to run code for the 'other' instruction set. Thanks, Mike -- http://www.mschaef.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
MSCHAEF.COM wrote: Can you speak a little more to how this was done? IIRC (and my recollection isn't too good), the K5 used a similar core to the AMD29000. I didn't know there was a way for it to run code for the 'other' instruction set. Yeah, they called them the macro-ops, and they could only be accessed by writing to specific model-specific registers, as I recall. But I might be wrong about how they were implemented. Yousuf Khan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
"YKhan" wrote in message ups.com... Another wild possibility is that AMD might open up its internal RISC implementation to direct access by applications. They used to allow that sort of thing on the K5 processor, but stopped it as of K6 onwards. That would be *very* interesting. It doesn't seem that it would be that difficult to do, and it would be very difficult for Intel to copy because it would be tightly tied to the AMD microarchitecture. One problem I see with doing this, precisely because it is so tightly tied to the chip's specific microarchitecure, is that it might limit what directions AMD can go in the future. Having to continue to support or abandon this microarchitecture could cripple AMD's subsequent processors. Future Intel CPUs would only have to support legacy x86 and x86-64 while future AMD CPUs would have to continue to support legacy x86, x86-64, and this new RISC thing. DS |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
YKhan wrote:
No real details here, just a "stay tuned" message, but that should be enough to start wild speculations running. "One strategic path that will knock you for a loop, and which I'll detail soon, is AMD's coming escape from the confines of Intel's x86 instruction set. To this point, AMD has resisted the temptation to overhaul the x86, even though it sorely needs it. When Fab 36 cranks up, AMD will overcome that fear. AMD64 processors will take on performance, scalability, resource management, and availability-related instruction set extensions that will be proprietary to AMD CPUs. Don't freak out: AMD will keep its contract to be 100 percent compatible with Intel-standard processors. But the idea of seeing "optimized for AMD64" stamped on software boxes delights me. " http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/...rss&url=http:/ /www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/26/44OPcurve_1.html or, http://tinyurl.com/cvvwn I'll start off with my own wild speculation. There was word that prior to choosing SSE2/SSE3 as its AMD64 floating point instruction set, AMD was investigating going its own way. So I'm going to speculate that AMD will extend floating point out with its previously abandonned instruction set. I'm going to speculate that this instruction set will be a full scientific functions instruction set, just like the old x87 FPU was, except without the stack-based register system. And let's say it'll have 32 FP registers instead of just 16 like SSE does. What's the market for this? Gamers maybe, engineering probably. Gamers buy because of the numbers, in most cases what they have generates more fps than the human eye can detect and the monitor can display, but a lot of people want a faster system for a better DSI. I think a lot will depend on the next Intel memory system, if bandwidth is the limit rather than CPU it might not be worth the chip area to do something else. AMD will check before going with this I'm sure, once it's out they have to support it, and if Intel comes up with something with the same performance AMD won't have the advantage as a selling point. Very interesting topic, could be more long term downside than upside if it isn't a huge win. -- -bill davidsen ) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
AMD to leave x86 behind?
"Bill Davidsen" wrote in message ... I think a lot will depend on the next Intel memory system, if bandwidth is the limit rather than CPU it might not be worth the chip area to do something else. Intel seems to keep talking about Fully Buffered Dimm, wonder what's up with that? And Micron just demonstrated a 4GB FBDimm. Didn't say what speed the links run at. del |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should I leave my printers on? | OM | Printers | 22 | August 8th 05 10:50 PM |
Please leave in garage? | John Hardaker | UK Computer Vendors | 1 | May 14th 05 07:34 PM |
Leave Dell 4600 PC Always On? | Filipo | General | 6 | September 15th 04 01:21 AM |
Turn printer off or leave it on? | Walter R. | Printers | 4 | February 29th 04 08:18 PM |
Should I leave well enough alone? | Ken Fox | Overclocking | 1 | January 25th 04 12:34 AM |