![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 May 2004 06:24:54 -0400, "HH" wrote:
Uh, an IDE card will not allow 3 drives on a cable any more than your onboard IDE controller will, so in actuality, it is not an answer either. Also, many PCs and their OSs react strangely to any more than 4 IDE devices total. Not quite. With a second IDE card, you could add 4 more devices. I've done this before with Win 3.1 and a pile of 120MB hard drives. As long as the correct drivers are used, no odd behavior should happen. It's not common though as for most people, 2 ports and 4 drives are usually enough. The only possible issues with multiple IDE cards is the boot order. Onboard IDE generally have boot drives only but if there's no onboard IDE or if it's been disabled and you have 2 or more IDE cards, figuring which card get sthe boot priority would require a bit of trial and error. Dale was politely making a good point. Yes he was. There is simply no way to get 3 or more IDE devices on the same IDE port. The OP was being a jerk for insisting the impossible was possible without closely checking for what it really was. (SCSI? Or 2 separate cables held together so it appears as one cable?) -- To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh, I was referring to non-ancient OSs. I've seen the squirrelly behavior
with more than 4 IDE devices in Win 95, 98, Me and even 2000 and XP. Raid controllers are another matter. A standard dual channel IDe controller and a raid controller often can co-exist peacefully. HH "Impmon" wrote in message ... On Sun, 9 May 2004 06:24:54 -0400, "HH" wrote: Uh, an IDE card will not allow 3 drives on a cable any more than your onboard IDE controller will, so in actuality, it is not an answer either. Also, many PCs and their OSs react strangely to any more than 4 IDE devices total. Not quite. With a second IDE card, you could add 4 more devices. I've done this before with Win 3.1 and a pile of 120MB hard drives. As long as the correct drivers are used, no odd behavior should happen. It's not common though as for most people, 2 ports and 4 drives are usually enough. The only possible issues with multiple IDE cards is the boot order. Onboard IDE generally have boot drives only but if there's no onboard IDE or if it's been disabled and you have 2 or more IDE cards, figuring which card get sthe boot priority would require a bit of trial and error. Dale was politely making a good point. Yes he was. There is simply no way to get 3 or more IDE devices on the same IDE port. The OP was being a jerk for insisting the impossible was possible without closely checking for what it really was. (SCSI? Or 2 separate cables held together so it appears as one cable?) -- To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 May 2004 06:13:36 -0400, "HH" wrote:
Uh, I was referring to non-ancient OSs. I've seen the squirrelly behavior with more than 4 IDE devices in Win 95, 98, Me and even 2000 and XP. Raid controllers are another matter. A standard dual channel IDe controller and a raid controller often can co-exist peacefully. Funny I don't have any problem with my current system: onboard IDE with 80GB primary, 60GB slave (boot drive), DVD-ROM and DVD burner and I have a plain vanilla ATA133 card added with 3x 200GB hard drives. The only odd problem I had in the past 6 months was that one of the 200GB hard drive mysteriously unformatted itself but that was probably because the file table was being written when a power failure happened and corrupted the partition data. Oh yeah I have XP with SP1, older XP can't handle 200GB drives anyway. -- To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tele64 wrote:
This group has tried to answer my question but can not.... The group has consistently and correctly answered your question, you simply refuse to accept the reply you've received! Regards, James Vist the NEW Thinkpad Forums: http://forum.thinkpads.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First, the other postings are correct. A standard IDE channel handles two, and
no more than two, devices. I have been in this business for many many years, and I have torn apart, serviced, or built thousands of computers. NEVER have I seen a 3-device 40-pin IDE cable. If it does exist, it also requires a non-standard IDE controller of some sort. IDE drives have exactly two device settings: master & slave. So no more than two devices per cable. SCSI controllers support up to 7, or even 15, devices depending on the type of SCSI you have. But SCSI uses 50-pin or 68-pin cables, not 40-pin. Second, you can add PCI IDE controller cards to a system to expand the number of IDE channels beyond the usual primary and secondary. I have seen systems with four IDE channels, two devices each, for a total of eight IDE devices. Even more are possible. Third, especially if the system is a Compaq, there is the possibility that the "floppy" drive is/was an LS120 drive with an IDE connector. LS120 reads and writes both its own 120MB disk and standard 1.44MB floppy diskettes. A system with three IDE devices would customarily use two IDE channels and have two cables. Rather than simply denying responses, as in the past, how about identifying the IDE controller card (manufacturer and model) which uses a 3-device cable and allows 3 devices to be attached? Thanks... Ben Myers On Mon, 3 May 2004 21:36:19 -0400, "tele64" wrote: Where can I buy a 3 drive (plus the motherboard connect) 40Pin ribbon cable? thanks in advance, tele64 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're a n00b. It's not nOOb. It's n00b. Sorry. I just had to say it.
"Impmon" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 4 May 2004 21:19:47 -0400, "tele64" wrote: you're wrong. Are you sure? Unless your son uses SCSI setup and has SCSI disk drive (is there such thing as internal SCSI floppy drive??), there is no way a floppy drive and hard drive can be on the same cable. Take another look, maybe it only appeared to be one cable is in fact 2 cables positioned close together so to fool some nOObs like you. Better yet, prove you're right by taking picture oif his computer and posting it so we could look for ourselves. -- To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You sure that nOOb isn't just an overweight n00b?
"Ryan 8088" wrote in message m... You're a n00b. It's not nOOb. It's n00b. Sorry. I just had to say it. "Impmon" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 4 May 2004 21:19:47 -0400, "tele64" wrote: you're wrong. Are you sure? Unless your son uses SCSI setup and has SCSI disk drive (is there such thing as internal SCSI floppy drive??), there is no way a floppy drive and hard drive can be on the same cable. Take another look, maybe it only appeared to be one cable is in fact 2 cables positioned close together so to fool some nOObs like you. Better yet, prove you're right by taking picture oif his computer and posting it so we could look for ourselves. -- To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point. He's prolly fat as a telly.
"Tom Scales" wrote in message ... | You sure that nOOb isn't just an overweight n00b? | "Ryan 8088" wrote in message | m... | You're a n00b. It's not nOOb. It's n00b. Sorry. I just had to say it. | "Impmon" wrote in message | news ![]() "tele64" | wrote: | | you're wrong. | | Are you sure? Unless your son uses SCSI setup and has SCSI disk drive | (is there such thing as internal SCSI floppy drive??), there is no way | a floppy drive and hard drive can be on the same cable. Take another | look, maybe it only appeared to be one cable is in fact 2 cables | positioned close together so to fool some nOObs like you. | | Better yet, prove you're right by taking picture oif his computer and | posting it so we could look for ourselves. | -- | To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net | | | | | |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you're wrong
"tele64" wrote in message . .. | you're wrong. | | | "doS" wrote in message | ... | No he doesn't. | | "tele64" wrote in message | . .. | HH, I don't get it....my nephew has 3 drives connected; 2 CDRW drives | and | one floppy.....all with one ribbon cable! | | | "HH" wrote in message | ... | You cannot. Only 2 drives per IDE controller. | HH | | "tele64" wrote in message | . .. | Where can I buy a 3 drive (plus the motherboard connect) 40Pin | ribbon | cable? | | thanks in advance, | | tele64 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ryan 8088" wrote in message om... Good point. He's prolly fat as a telly. "Tom Scales" wrote in message ... | You sure that nOOb isn't just an overweight n00b? | "Ryan 8088" wrote in message | m... | You're a n00b. It's not nOOb. It's n00b. Sorry. I just had to say it. | "Impmon" wrote in message | news ![]() "tele64" | wrote: | | you're wrong. | | Are you sure? Unless your son uses SCSI setup and has SCSI disk drive | (is there such thing as internal SCSI floppy drive??), there is no way Well, there is such a device as an internal SCSI floppy but I've only seen them in older Sun Sparc hardware. I'd be very surprised to see one in a Compaq consumer product. | a floppy drive and hard drive can be on the same cable. Take another | look, maybe it only appeared to be one cable is in fact 2 cables | positioned close together so to fool some nOObs like you. I'd go with this poster. You in fact have two cables which can be hard to see when they're jammed in to tight areas. | Better yet, prove you're right by taking picture oif his computer and | posting it so we could look for ourselves. | -- | To reply, replace digi.mon with tds.net | | | | | -- Herb Stein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to test psu and reset to cmos to default | Tanya | General | 23 | February 7th 05 09:56 AM |
"Failure Imminent" should i continue? | Lindsay | Asus Motherboards | 3 | July 11th 04 06:45 PM |
Help... | Gene Puhl | Homebuilt PC's | 3 | April 10th 04 02:16 AM |
Help needed: problem installing XP on new system | GJ | General | 26 | March 1st 04 10:04 PM |
isolating new clone drive for 1st bootup | Timothy Daniels | General | 86 | February 29th 04 03:37 PM |