If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
We know there are a lot of vendors offering SATA JBODs with either FC or
Ultra320 interfaces. They all pretty much offer hot-swap drives, but I haven't seen any that package the individual drives in such a way that they're designed to be portable/modular. You remove a bare drive in some type of convenience tray, but not something protective that would facilitate vault storage. Has anyone seen any SATA JBODs where the drives are packaged in removable cartridges that might be suitable for storage outside the JBOD? Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
David Boyer wrote:
We know there are a lot of vendors offering SATA JBODs with either FC or Ultra320 interfaces. They all pretty much offer hot-swap drives, but I haven't seen any that package the individual drives in such a way that they're designed to be portable/modular. You remove a bare drive in some type of convenience tray, but not something protective that would facilitate vault storage. Has anyone seen any SATA JBODs where the drives are packaged in removable cartridges that might be suitable for storage outside the JBOD? ProStor Systems in Colorado are doing something along those lines (see www.prostorsytems.com) I think the reason you don't tend to see it as a common feature is that for most backup-to-disk applications it would be of dubious utility since each backup set spans multiple disks in order to achieve the required throughput, so can't just pull a disk and take them somewhere else to read the data, you'd have to pull the entire stripe. In addition, most people who want long term archive storage are still going with tape even if they use D2D for their frontline backup application. -- Nik Simpson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Previously David Boyer wrote:
We know there are a lot of vendors offering SATA JBODs with either FC or Ultra320 interfaces. They all pretty much offer hot-swap drives, but I haven't seen any that package the individual drives in such a way that they're designed to be portable/modular. You remove a bare drive in some type of convenience tray, but not something protective that would facilitate vault storage. Has anyone seen any SATA JBODs where the drives are packaged in removable cartridges that might be suitable for storage outside the JBOD? First, JBOD is about the least suitable option for backup. Loose one disk and loose everything. Second, why not use eSATA disks directly? Arno |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
"Arno Wagner" wrote in message
... Previously David Boyer wrote: We know there are a lot of vendors offering SATA JBODs with either FC or Ultra320 interfaces. They all pretty much offer hot-swap drives, but I haven't seen any that package the individual drives in such a way that they're designed to be portable/modular. You remove a bare drive in some type of convenience tray, but not something protective that would facilitate vault storage. Has anyone seen any SATA JBODs where the drives are packaged in removable cartridges that might be suitable for storage outside the JBOD? First, JBOD is about the least suitable option for backup. Loose one disk and loose everything. If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Second, why not use eSATA disks directly? eSATA disks are also an option we're looking at. Arno |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Previously David Boyer wrote:
"Arno Wagner" wrote in message ... Previously David Boyer wrote: We know there are a lot of vendors offering SATA JBODs with either FC or Ultra320 interfaces. They all pretty much offer hot-swap drives, but I haven't seen any that package the individual drives in such a way that they're designed to be portable/modular. You remove a bare drive in some type of convenience tray, but not something protective that would facilitate vault storage. Has anyone seen any SATA JBODs where the drives are packaged in removable cartridges that might be suitable for storage outside the JBOD? First, JBOD is about the least suitable option for backup. Loose one disk and loose everything. If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. JBOD is a RAID mode. It just places the individual disks sectors one after another and supports differently sized disks. JBOD is not RAID 1/5/10 or any other redundant RAID level. JBOD is sometimes called APPEND mode (e.g. by the Linux LVM). Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Maybe you mean something else than the Just a Bunch Of Disks RAID mode here? Arno |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Arno Wagner wrote:
Previously David Boyer wrote: If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. JBOD is a RAID mode. It just places the individual disks sectors one after another and supports differently sized disks. JBOD is not RAID 1/5/10 or any other redundant RAID level. JBOD is sometimes called APPEND mode (e.g. by the Linux LVM). Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Maybe you mean something else than the Just a Bunch Of Disks RAID mode here? To me, JBOD means "Just a Bunch Of Disks". That's a system where each of the individual disks is visible to the operating system in their raw individual disk form, rather than visible to the OS as a virtual volume pre-virtualized by a hardware RAID disk array. JBODs can then be volumized by software RAID into concats, stripes, mirrors, RAID 5, and other RAID modes. Yousuf Khan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Previously Yousuf Khan wrote:
Arno Wagner wrote: Previously David Boyer wrote: If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. JBOD is a RAID mode. It just places the individual disks sectors one after another and supports differently sized disks. JBOD is not RAID 1/5/10 or any other redundant RAID level. JBOD is sometimes called APPEND mode (e.g. by the Linux LVM). Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Maybe you mean something else than the Just a Bunch Of Disks RAID mode here? To me, JBOD means "Just a Bunch Of Disks". That's a system where each of the individual disks is visible to the operating system in their raw individual disk form, rather than visible to the OS as a virtual volume pre-virtualized by a hardware RAID disk array. JBODs can then be volumized by software RAID into concats, stripes, mirrors, RAID 5, and other RAID modes. Well, then you should adjust your language to the standards that cover this, unless you want to be misunderstood. JBOD does mean "Just a Bunch Of Disks", but "Just a Bunch Of Disks" is a RAID mode also known as SPAN, concat or append mode. A reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels Arno |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
See Nik's reply above? That's what a useful response looks like. He actually
answered the question. You can cite Wikipedia all day as though it's implicitly authoritative, but the reality is that numerous vendors are selling JBODs that don't match the "standard" definition. Maybe they need to consult with wikipedia or Arno before those items go to market. JBOD seems to be a broad term applied to multi-disk SAN-type enclosures that aren't being connected to a fabric. Maybe I should have said "multi drive SATA enclosure" instead of JBOD. Now, can you answer the question, or is nit-picking pretty much the limit of what you can contribute? "Arno Wagner" wrote in message ... Previously Yousuf Khan wrote: Arno Wagner wrote: Previously David Boyer wrote: If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. JBOD is a RAID mode. It just places the individual disks sectors one after another and supports differently sized disks. JBOD is not RAID 1/5/10 or any other redundant RAID level. JBOD is sometimes called APPEND mode (e.g. by the Linux LVM). Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Maybe you mean something else than the Just a Bunch Of Disks RAID mode here? To me, JBOD means "Just a Bunch Of Disks". That's a system where each of the individual disks is visible to the operating system in their raw individual disk form, rather than visible to the OS as a virtual volume pre-virtualized by a hardware RAID disk array. JBODs can then be volumized by software RAID into concats, stripes, mirrors, RAID 5, and other RAID modes. Well, then you should adjust your language to the standards that cover this, unless you want to be misunderstood. JBOD does mean "Just a Bunch Of Disks", but "Just a Bunch Of Disks" is a RAID mode also known as SPAN, concat or append mode. A reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels Arno |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Previously David Boyer wrote:
See Nik's reply above? That's what a useful response looks like. He actually answered the question. You can cite Wikipedia all day as though it's implicitly authoritative, but the reality is that numerous vendors are selling JBODs that don't match the "standard" definition. Maybe they need to consult with wikipedia or Arno before those items go to market. Maybe they need to read up waht terms mean before using them. JBOD seems to be a broad term applied to multi-disk SAN-type enclosures that aren't being connected to a fabric. Maybe in marketing-speak. In engineering it has a meaning that is the one e.g. described in wikipedia. You can also do a google-search for the term and see what you find there or you can look into manufacturer documentation. Maybe I should have said "multi drive SATA enclosure" instead of JBOD. Now there is a term that actually matches your intention. Now, can you answer the question, or is nit-picking pretty much the limit of what you can contribute? Term clarification is not nit-picking. It is essential for meaningful communication. Even more when vendors start to use terms that already have a different meaning for their own thing, maybe because it sounds cool. As to your original question, no, the only variant I know is using individual eSATA disks, since they are packaged for separate storage. In principle the external SATA RAID enclosures you are talking about can all use eSATA instead of internal SATA, since it is identical on the software side. On the hardware side, you may need to stay within SATA cable lenght limits (1m) to make it work with internal SATA controllers. But quite frankly, as with regard to resonable disk protection for storege, I am less than impressed with current eSATA enclosures. The ones I havve seen do not have reasonable shock protection (i.e. they are pretty equivalent to a bare drive), no moisture seals and no dust seals. I think the best option is to use the internal removable bays and add your own packaging. Depending on what you need an anti-static bag and two layers of high-quality bubble wrap may be enough. There are also HDD shiping containers that have 5cm of foam-rubber in all directions. Combine that with an anti-static bag and there you go. Yes, I know this is stupid, but there seems to be no market for what you want. And yes, I agree that this would be a good idea to have available. Arno "Arno Wagner" wrote in message ... Previously Yousuf Khan wrote: Arno Wagner wrote: Previously David Boyer wrote: If you lose one disk, you shouldn't lose everything IF the JBOD is configured properly. You can usually use mirroring, RAID 5, RAID 6, and RAID 10, and any other methods you would use to survive one or more disk failures. JBOD is a RAID mode. It just places the individual disks sectors one after another and supports differently sized disks. JBOD is not RAID 1/5/10 or any other redundant RAID level. JBOD is sometimes called APPEND mode (e.g. by the Linux LVM). Depending on the JBOD vendor, the array config is stored on each of the physical disks, so you can remove a disk or diskset and pop it in a year later and have it back online just by installing the drives. We've been doing backups to a 6TB SATA JBOD for nearly two years, and it works great. The problem with our JBOD is that drives are hot-swappable, but aren't otherwise designed to be modular. Maybe you mean something else than the Just a Bunch Of Disks RAID mode here? To me, JBOD means "Just a Bunch Of Disks". That's a system where each of the individual disks is visible to the operating system in their raw individual disk form, rather than visible to the OS as a virtual volume pre-virtualized by a hardware RAID disk array. JBODs can then be volumized by software RAID into concats, stripes, mirrors, RAID 5, and other RAID modes. Well, then you should adjust your language to the standards that cover this, unless you want to be misunderstood. JBOD does mean "Just a Bunch Of Disks", but "Just a Bunch Of Disks" is a RAID mode also known as SPAN, concat or append mode. A reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels Arno |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
SATA JBODs for backup-to-disk
Previously David Boyer wrote:
See Nik's reply above? That's what a useful response looks like. He actually answered the question. Well, as to that, ProStore simply seems to use 2.5" laptop disks, which are inherently more robust than 3.5" disks (because of the intended application). It does not look to me like they actually add much of value to the bare drive. And of course you take a performance and a cost and a capacity hit with this approach. Arno |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Disk to Disk Backup is Very Slow, Solutions ? | Jay | Storage & Hardrives | 10 | October 23rd 06 05:30 PM |
Boot off SATA with ATA disk + other SATA disk present? | Asus Motherboards | 15 | May 27th 05 02:35 PM | |
Disk to Disk Backup Question | Ken | Storage (alternative) | 4 | December 26th 04 03:06 PM |
Disk to Disk Backup recommendations requested | Michelle | Storage (alternative) | 12 | September 9th 04 04:15 PM |
Disk to Disk Backup recommendations please (entry level system) | Michelle | Storage & Hardrives | 6 | September 5th 04 03:44 AM |