If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
netbackup datacenter vault errors with 275....
Hi - newbie type question alert! I've googled but no joy... I have
inherited a netbackup solution and am trying to come to grips with it... it is running netbackup datacentre 4.5 on a Sun V480 running Solaris 8. There are 4 media servers and policies exist for vault runs for reach of them. There are some vault failures that I am having trouble understanding - when I checked the activity monitor this morning I noticed that a vault run for the master server (policy named "vault-master" - a daily automatic vault with a schedule window of 06:00-noon which runs the command "/opt/openv/netbackup/bin/vltrun master-offsite") had failed with an error status 275 - "a session is already running for this vault". Its start time was today 06:03. However, when I check what else was running to see why it had failed with such an error I see that the previous time that policy had run was yesterday at the same time ... it had completed successfully at 09:46 the same day. In other words this policy was NOT running at the same time as today's attempt... However, further investigation showed that a DIFFERENT vault policy WAS running at that time. i.e. a vault policy for one of the other media servers (policy named "vault-ms2") which runs the command "/opt/openv/netbackup/bin/vltrun ms2-offsite". master-offsite and ms2-offsite are both definied within vault management the former for all backups on all clients on media server "master" for all policies and schedules, and the latter similarly except for media server "ms2". The same source volume group is used for both... Having checked all policies are set on the master server - there are no policies defined on the actiual media-server itselkf (ie ms2). So - the basic question is... does "vault-master" fail because "vault-ms2" is running, even though they were presumably intended to be different jobs handling different backups from different media servers? Secondary question(s) : If the above is correct should the configuration be (to make the initial intention work as originally planned) that each media server should be controlling its own backup policies and schedules etc. (although there doesn't appear to be an option to do this via tyhe gui which suggests this sin;t feasible), or should it be (given ALL policies etc are defined on the master server) that their should be one single vault policy that vaults all four media-servers in one hit? And if the above ISN'T correct (ie the failure 275 is not due to the other vault job running) then has anybody any suggestions as to its cause? Thanks In Advance! Ian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
From reading the vault manual while doing an install last week I noticed
that you cannot have 2 instances of vault running at the same time. You must change your policy schedules to make this work. No overlaps or possible overlaps. "didds" wrote in message oups.com... Hi - newbie type question alert! I've googled but no joy... I have inherited a netbackup solution and am trying to come to grips with it... it is running netbackup datacentre 4.5 on a Sun V480 running Solaris 8. There are 4 media servers and policies exist for vault runs for reach of them. There are some vault failures that I am having trouble understanding - when I checked the activity monitor this morning I noticed that a vault run for the master server (policy named "vault-master" - a daily automatic vault with a schedule window of 06:00-noon which runs the command "/opt/openv/netbackup/bin/vltrun master-offsite") had failed with an error status 275 - "a session is already running for this vault". Its start time was today 06:03. However, when I check what else was running to see why it had failed with such an error I see that the previous time that policy had run was yesterday at the same time ... it had completed successfully at 09:46 the same day. In other words this policy was NOT running at the same time as today's attempt... However, further investigation showed that a DIFFERENT vault policy WAS running at that time. i.e. a vault policy for one of the other media servers (policy named "vault-ms2") which runs the command "/opt/openv/netbackup/bin/vltrun ms2-offsite". master-offsite and ms2-offsite are both definied within vault management the former for all backups on all clients on media server "master" for all policies and schedules, and the latter similarly except for media server "ms2". The same source volume group is used for both... Having checked all policies are set on the master server - there are no policies defined on the actiual media-server itselkf (ie ms2). So - the basic question is... does "vault-master" fail because "vault-ms2" is running, even though they were presumably intended to be different jobs handling different backups from different media servers? Secondary question(s) : If the above is correct should the configuration be (to make the initial intention work as originally planned) that each media server should be controlling its own backup policies and schedules etc. (although there doesn't appear to be an option to do this via tyhe gui which suggests this sin;t feasible), or should it be (given ALL policies etc are defined on the master server) that their should be one single vault policy that vaults all four media-servers in one hit? And if the above ISN'T correct (ie the failure 275 is not due to the other vault job running) then has anybody any suggestions as to its cause? Thanks In Advance! Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
C1 and C2 errors | James Perrett | Cdr | 10 | April 14th 04 08:08 AM |
Solution for strange graphics errors (long) | Henrik Stavnshøj | Ati Videocards | 0 | April 9th 04 12:21 PM |
Can't install any OS (hardware fault?) | Paul Richard | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | September 27th 03 12:55 PM |
How concerned should I be about these Nero CD-Speed C2 errors? | Robert Hancock | Cdr | 5 | August 19th 03 12:34 AM |
Update: Memtest86 errors | Bob Davis | Gigabyte Motherboards | 2 | August 3rd 03 06:27 AM |