A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rambus sued for patent violation!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 30th 05, 03:41 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036

Yousuf Khan

  #2  
Old November 30th 05, 04:01 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

On 30 Nov 2005 07:41:49 -0800, "YKhan" wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036


I thought I had seen the last of the Rambus circus, do we have to
bring them up again? :P

--
A Lost Angel, fallen from heaven
Lost in dreams, Lost in aspirations,
Lost to the world, Lost to myself
  #3  
Old November 30th 05, 04:14 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New newsgroup formed

alt.invest.stocks.rambus is an unmoderated newsgroup. It's meant
for the discussion of company news about RAMBUS and its competitors
and partners.

For your newsgroups file:
alt.invest.stocks.rambus RAMBUS (RMBS) stock chat

Charter:
Discussions about RAMBUS (RMBS) company news and stock investment
topics. RMBS is a law firm which sues makers of semiconductors used
in home PCs, among other things; it's main competitor is Micron.
One should not ask for RMBS product technical support in this
newsgroup, such as how to dispose of your Intel-RAMBUS based PC.
Unmarked off-topic materials, binaries (except PGP-type
signatures), advertising (spam), excessive posting,
cancel attacks, and abusive cross postings are prohibited.

....just ;-)

--
Keith

P.S. Yousuf, individual.net has agreed to carry AISA and it should
be set up in an hour or so. Unfortunately, they have no history so
only new articles will be carried.
  #4  
Old November 30th 05, 04:28 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

They're always funny. :-)

  #5  
Old November 30th 05, 04:31 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New newsgroup formed

Keith wrote:
P.S. Yousuf, individual.net has agreed to carry AISA and it should
be set up in an hour or so. Unfortunately, they have no history so
only new articles will be carried.


Cool thanks for the info. Users are slowly trickling in there.

Yousuf Khan

  #6  
Old November 30th 05, 09:28 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

On 30 Nov 2005 07:41:49 -0800, "YKhan" wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036


Hmm, that's the 2nd one... both Canadian. Mosaid has been in the process
of suing Rambus for several months now.

--
Rgds, George Macdonald
  #7  
Old November 30th 05, 10:44 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

On 30 Nov 2005 07:41:49 -0800, "YKhan" wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036

Yousuf Khan


What goes around, comes around. Just a few years ago, the Law Firm of
Rambus, Scambus, & Shambus LLP (sorry, don't remember who came up with
this definition first) sued everyone and their mother-in-law for
patent infringement, and claimed they owned the IP in all present,
past, and future types of memory. Serves them well.

NNN

  #8  
Old December 1st 05, 06:13 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:28:36 -0500, George Macdonald
wrote:

On 30 Nov 2005 07:41:49 -0800, "YKhan" wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036


Hmm, that's the 2nd one... both Canadian. Mosaid has been in the process
of suing Rambus for several months now.


Have they actually sued Rambus? I know that Mosaid has been, umm,
having talks with Infineon, Hynix and Samsung (and previously some
others), but I didn't think them and Rambus had been going at each
other yet.

It is kinda funny though, Mosaid was the company that immediately
jumped to mind when I read the headline and then again after I saw
that it was a Canadian company!

sigh I am still kind of sad about Mosaid. They are based here in my
home town and just ten years ago seemed like they were becoming a real
leader in the technology front. However something changed in ~2000,
perhaps even related to the whole Rambus fiasco. All of a sudden they
laid off all their engineers and hired on a whole lot of lawyers.
They stopped innovating and starting litigating.

Perhaps there is a glimmer of hope though. I just checked the
"career" section of their website and the only 4 jobs they have listed
are all pure engineering jobs. Even Rambus is hiring people to do
actual design work again, though I do also see some tell-tale job
postings for "Patent Attorney" and such.


Interesting point of note: This new company that is suing Rambus is a
non-profit organization!

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca
  #9  
Old December 1st 05, 02:07 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

YKhan wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036


Unstable junk DDR dead dead dead!

  #10  
Old December 1st 05, 06:10 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rambus sued for patent violation!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article ,
chrisv wrote:
YKhan wrote:

Now for something completely different.

Rambus sued over patent violation
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28036


Unstable junk DDR dead dead dead!


I'd like to show the corse's ass who used to repeat that phrase ad infinitum
the server that's running alfter.us. The motherboard is coming up on five
years old now, and it's been running on the same pair of PC1600 DDR DIMMs
the whole time.

(The board is a Biostar M7MIA; the processor on it is a 1.0-GHz Athlon.)

_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDjzyuVgTKos01OwkRAsgLAKDoPR9OPbvHbDwxDGrvco H/ZJcU1QCgz93X
QMZQy3nJ9aM1N279eifCqUw=
=A2X4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rambus continues its march into oblivion Sparky Dell Computers 0 March 2nd 05 12:04 PM
Rambus for GPUs? (was: Cell Processor Uses Rambus ...) Tony Hill General 4 February 14th 05 02:33 AM
Rambus shares rise on FTC's Unocal ruling Robert Myers General 45 December 3rd 03 02:57 AM
Hypertransport group gains TI, IBM Keith R. Williams General 46 August 30th 03 05:03 AM
Hypertransport group gains TI, IBM Keith R. Williams Intel 46 August 30th 03 05:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.