If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
HD DVD and Blu-ray Now Completely Hacked, Cracked, Sacked - Gizmodo
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-ente...ked-236213.php |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
Yousuf Khan wrote:
: HD DVD and Blu-ray Now Completely Hacked, Cracked, Sacked - : Gizmodo : http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-ente...ked-236213.php That's just f**kin great! I've always loved the Doom forums (been following them since around the year 2000) and am a TOTAL anti-DRM believer. No, I'm not a pirate, just your average Joe who believes backup copies of your **purchased** movies (whether DVD, HD DVD, or whatever) is your "god-given right." To hell with both the MPAA, RIAA, and for that matter the U.S. government and their bull**** DMCA (digital millennium copyright act). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
Yousuf Khan wrote:
: HD DVD and Blu-ray Now Completely Hacked, Cracked, Sacked - : Gizmodo : http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-ente...ked-236213.php This is completely OT, but here's the history in the making: -------------- Wooow. I think I did it. Processing Key found!!! More info later. To be sure I need to confirm my finding. I need the following (from anybody with a HD DVD disc): 1) - Movie Title (not King Kong please ) 2) - The Verify Media Key Record in the MKBROM.AACS file. It starts with 81 00 00 14 followed by the 16 byte Record. In my case this it at Offset 00000120h. Here is mine: Code: 81 00 00 14 87 B8 A2 B7 C1 0B 9F AD F8 C4 36 1E 23 86 59 E5 7F 00 00 xx3) - The first C-Value in the MKBROM.AACS file (also called Media Key Data). It starts with 05 00 20 14 (the 20 14 could be different but is probably the same) followed by the first 16 byte C-Value. In my case this it at Offset 00004376h. Here is mine: Code: 05 00 20 14 6D 02 CA C6 7B 1A 7E 95 C2 16 EF D4 C9 28 09 CF D3 CE 9A DCIf you react quickly I can check if the Processing Key is really valid (for multiple discs). Yeah I'm happy... ---------------------------------- 1.) The Departed 2.) Quote: FF 29 11 E9 96 16 5D 97 29 2D BB A0 3C A9 0D E0 3.) Quote: 68 07 C3 23 7E 18 6F 7F BC 78 E2 DC 26 C5 84 0B Hope that helps. EDIT: Here's another disc just for kicks. 1.) Spy Game 2.) Quote: 7C AD 1D 65 D5 9E C1 67 A7 96 E5 C2 13 23 08 22 3.) Quote: 59 28 94 3F 5C 09 19 2C 8D 54 0A 77 45 BE 3E 6D Last edited by Eeknay : 11th February 2007 at 14:06. ---------------------------------- Quote: Originally Posted by Eeknay 1.) The Departed 2.) 3.) Hope that helps. EDIT: Here's another disc just for kicks. 1.) Spy Game 2.) 3.) YES YES YES!! It works! I'm going to take some rest now (I need it ). But will tell all later. Here is the Processing Key which should work on all HD DVD discs (and maybe even Blu-Ray discs) released so far: Code: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0Save it. Store it. Regards, arnezami PS. As explained before in order to get a VUK you now only need a Volume ID (which should be fairly easy to get or even to guess...). ------------------------------- Indeed a real breakthrough!! Congrats everybody for the thrill of witnessing how DRM was defeated. February 11, 2007 is a day to be remembered. I predict that movies will one day be liberated without DRM and we are all going to loose all the fun and excitement. Fairuse wins!! PS. As in LOR, this is the KEY(RING) to conquer all!! Now, we have to find the processing key for blueray to help out HD-DVD market position. Movie studios may just stop releasing new movies on HD-DVDs. There should be a level playing field for the competing formats. Fin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
On Feb 14, 4:54 pm, "The Lone Gunman" wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: : HD DVD and Blu-ray Now Completely Hacked, Cracked, Sacked - : Gizmodo snip PS. As explained before in order to get a VUK you now only need a Volume ID (which should be fairly easy to get or even to guess...). ------------------------------- Indeed a real breakthrough!! Congrats everybody for the thrill of witnessing how DRM was defeated. February 11, 2007 is a day to be remembered. I predict that movies will one day be liberated without DRM and we are all going to loose all the fun and excitement. Fairuse wins!! PS. As in LOR, this is the KEY(RING) to conquer all!! Now, we have to find the processing key for blueray to help out HD-DVD market position. Movie studios may just stop releasing new movies on HD-DVDs. There should be a level playing field for the competing formats. Fin wink.gif 1KViewDownload I am waiting for the response from the studio's, do they want to start revoking keys regardless of the consequences? Or will they push more TPM on motherboards try to implement more DRM? The next few months should be very interesting, I could see the EU really making a difference as they are starting to come around about music DRM, if only they would focus their ire against the right people the music companies. This could have the side effect of pushing more studios to an online model, I could see in the future of online release first followed by retail copies. Gnu_Raiz |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completelycracked
Gnu_Raiz wrote:
I am waiting for the response from the studio's, do they want to start revoking keys regardless of the consequences? Or will they push more TPM on motherboards try to implement more DRM? The next few months should be very interesting, I could see the EU really making a difference as they are starting to come around about music DRM, if only they would focus their ire against the right people the music companies. This could have the side effect of pushing more studios to an online model, I could see in the future of online release first followed by retail copies. Gnu_Raiz I wonder if revoking the keys is going to work at all anymore? It looks like with this technique, all anyone has to do is wait for the processing key to appear in memory, and they have it again (albeit, easier said than done). No matter how many keys they revoke and reissue, they will always lose it. Yousuf Khan -- There is no failure, only delayed success |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
The Lone Gunman wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: : HD DVD and Blu-ray Now Completely Hacked, Cracked, Sacked - : Gizmodo : http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-ente...-bluray-now-co mpletely-hacked-cracked-sacked-236213.php That's just f**kin great! I've always loved the Doom forums (been following them since around the year 2000) and am a TOTAL anti-DRM believer. No, I'm not a pirate, just your average Joe who believes backup copies of your purchased movies (whether DVD, HD DVD, or whatever) is your "god-given right." To hell with both the MPAA, RIAA, and for that matter the U.S. government and their bull**** DMCA (digital millennium copyright act). YA!!!!!!! now I can buy HD!! no comment on the piracy topic................ I do rent however........... -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completelycracked
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Gnu_Raiz wrote: I am waiting for the response from the studio's, do they want to start revoking keys regardless of the consequences? Or will they push more TPM on motherboards try to implement more DRM? The next few months should be very interesting, I could see the EU really making a difference as they are starting to come around about music DRM, if only they would focus their ire against the right people the music companies. This could have the side effect of pushing more studios to an online model, I could see in the future of online release first followed by retail copies. Gnu_Raiz I wonder if revoking the keys is going to work at all anymore? It looks like with this technique, all anyone has to do is wait for the processing key to appear in memory, and they have it again (albeit, easier said than done). No matter how many keys they revoke and reissue, they will always lose it. Yousuf Khan Of cause this shows a fundamental limit of security that can be implemented in a PC. PC does not have a secure memory, period. That itself says that NO protection scheme in the PC can be secure even theoretically. To have a secure protection scheme in a device, it requires a memory space that is not accessible by any processes outside the CPU micro-code, e.g. secure memory. That means micro-code itself would have to do all the decrypting, authentication etc. Obviously this memory space has to be factory programmed, or at least a seal code has to be factory programmed which allows access to programming the secure memory. None of these exists in a PC architecture, so as long as something is PC-playable, it is not going to be secure (until this architecture is changed). To change this architecture is not going to be easy of cause, it would conceptually obsolete most of existing software. Most important, every software installation would require to have a hardware component with its own secure memory that has to be securely(*) attached to the processing unit to program secure memory with the new description code specific for this new software. "Securely attached" means excluding external monitoring of communication lines to steal the software decryption key, which is fundamentally possible only with QM cryptography. Good enough approximation (which does not need a hardware component) might be public-key cryptography with the software decryption key being encrypted with the public key of the "internal" recipient (e.g. micro-code in CPU) while secret key is factory programmed in the secure memory of CPU and allows the micro-code to decrypt the software key. Unfortunately this "internal" secret key would become a holly grail of the whole system which is now more difficult to compromise because it is in secure memory, but considering its uniqueness to entire architecture of the world PCs, it could still be eventually compromised by hardware attack or social engineering attack. It is just not right to center security of the whole system around one key. Which brings us back to QM-cryptography and hardware modules coming with each software. Anyway, I think copy-right concept that was initially intended for protecting book publishers from competitors copying their products have been incorrectly extended on private activities people themselves involve with. This resulted in creating an artificial monopoly on content distribution (which should actually be competitive and as wide open as possible) instead of solving actual problem of compensating content creators. So, if the means on maintaining this unproductive state-sponsored monopoly are being cracked, why should I care. But the problem of securing the content in a PC still remains interesting topic in itself. Regards, Evgenij |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completely cracked
Evgenij Barsukov wrote in part:
Of cause this shows a fundamental limit of security that can be implemented in a PC. PC does not have a secure memory, period. That itself says that NO protection scheme in the PC can be secure even theoretically. Perhaps you should define what you mean by security before making such absolute statements. Security implies a threat, and there are many different types of threat. So security is a vector, not a scalar. As for x86 IBM PC compatible architecture, I agree RAM is not secure against threats from the PCI or other busses. Page tables and other CPU-side protection doesn't operate, and a hostile device (or more likely friendly device with hostile programming) can easily snoop whatever it wants. Think a trojan or worm that accesses an ethercard's busmastering. A decent OS would prevent this. To have a secure protection scheme in a device, it requires a memory space that is not accessible by any processes outside the CPU micro-code, e.g. secure memory. That means micro-code itself would have to do all the decrypting, authentication etc. Obviously this memory space has to be factory programmed, or at least a seal code has to be factory programmed which allows access to programming the secure memory. None of these exists in a PC architecture, so as long as something is PC-playable, it is not going to be secure (until this architecture is changed). I believe that devices such as SmartCards and other dongles are within "PC architecture" and conceptually reasonably secure. Of course various debuggers can bypass this security, especially if it is poorly implemented (one-time check). But then the question becomes the value of the prize, and whether such a valuable asset (worth running royalties) should be on any customer system rather than a controlled compute server. More paranoia doesn't make up for misplaced paranoia. -- Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That didn't take so long ... HD & Blu-ray DVD now completelycracked
Evgenij Barsukov wrote:
Of cause this shows a fundamental limit of security that can be implemented in a PC. PC does not have a secure memory, period. That itself says that NO protection scheme in the PC can be secure even theoretically. There was some talk in the original Microsoft Trusted Computing Platform/Palladium specs for a secure memory scheme. It seemed unbelievably complex, and performance-sapping. I guess this stuff never made it into the DRM that we did eventually end up with. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compaq Deskpro won't boot, won't read floppy or CD, 1 long beep-1 short-1 long-1 short, pause then 1 long-2 short beeps | Olde Fortran | Compaq Computers | 2 | May 31st 06 04:45 AM |
System Beeps - Five Beeps (One long, two short, high pitch, low pitch) | Huw E | General | 3 | January 30th 04 03:49 AM |
System Beeps - Five Beeps (One long, two short, high pitch, low pitch) | Huw E | General | 0 | January 28th 04 10:58 PM |
Get the Serial Number with Visual Basic | Michael Wittmann | General | 15 | November 15th 03 06:03 PM |
Silent Computer - Advice | David Taylor | General | 49 | October 7th 03 11:26 AM |