Q: Why don't desktops us mobile cpus?

True, True....

The only certainty to any of that was the core sizes (also referenced on
Intel's own site). Very interesting times ahead.

"Gargravarr" wrote in message
.. .
I can only guess, but if you're lighting your whole house with a coupla
hundred watts then either your house is *very* small or you're walking
around it in the f**kin' dark like you are in this NG.
"That's huge" ? You idiot.

You're the idiot walking around in the dark, obviously unable to add or
multiply. One energy saver is 13 watts at most, some are 7 watts i believe.
For 200 watts I can have 15+ light bulbs running, which is about the total
number of lights in my 4 bedroom home. I'd never have every globe running at
once so I'm probably lighting my house with 100watts.

Michael

"kony" wrote in message
...
It is fairly easy to do it. Except for a reading area,
one's eyes generally acclimate fine to lower wattage light,

I'd be lighting my entire house with 200 watts and it's definately not dark.
Those 13watt energy savers light a normal sized bedroom on their own quite
well. The larger rooms would have 2.

a couple bulbs in fairly unrestricted fixtures can light a
room fine, maybe 4 per large room, so with 14W per CCFL
"bulb",

It would be like a supermarket with 4! :-)

Michael

"ISOHaven" wrote in message
...
Except those numbers are coming from LAPTOP components.

No, it was a desktop motherboard and desktop power supply, NOT laptop.

I think you are trying compare apples and oranges. I seriously doubt you
could run a Pentium M mainboard/CPU along with DESKTOP COMPONENTS on a 60W
power supply.

That's what the site said.

Is your source trying to specify that a specific 60W is needed for only
the processor? Or for the "mobile" system (assuming laptop parts)?

I believe you needed a low power hdd and CD also.

Michael