If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8400: Processor Vs. Ram
I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the
final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system. I am trying to choose between these three options... (1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram (2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram (3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and 2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase. On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon, the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about the same. Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram. Please let me know what option you would go with, especially considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with this system. -Tracy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I use a Dimension 2400 with a P4-2.8 and 640MB ram to do video
editing/rendering. Works flawlessly without dropping a frame. 1GB is plenty. 3.0 to 3.4 is small and you won't notice it --- much. Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way. 2GB is wasted. Tom "Tracy" wrote in message om... I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system. I am trying to choose between these three options... (1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram (2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram (3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and 2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase. On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon, the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about the same. Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram. Please let me know what option you would go with, especially considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with this system. -Tracy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so
you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way. I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives? -Tracy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Not to me. A decent 7200rpm drive is enough.
Tom "Tracy" wrote in message om... Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way. I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives? -Tracy |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
better check again. Memory for the 8400 at the time of purchase is
competitively priced. Much less expensive than Crucial. "daniel" wrote in message om... Whichever amount of RAM you decide to go with, I'd compare the cost of buying it from Dell and the cost of buying it from www.crucial.com Dell usually charges and arm and a leg for RAM. Daniel (Tracy) wrote in message . com... I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system. I am trying to choose between these three options... (1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram (2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram (3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and 2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase. On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon, the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about the same. Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram. Please let me know what option you would go with, especially considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with this system. -Tracy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Tracy" wrote in message om... Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way. I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives? -Tracy No. Absolutely not. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I use Pinnacle Studio Pro 9.0 and encode video from a DV camcorder using the
following: 8300 2.6 P4 1.5 gigabytes of ram 2 - 250 gig IDE drive XP Pro Haven't lost a frame... Dave "WSZsr" wrote in message m... better check again. Memory for the 8400 at the time of purchase is competitively priced. Much less expensive than Crucial. "daniel" wrote in message om... Whichever amount of RAM you decide to go with, I'd compare the cost of buying it from Dell and the cost of buying it from www.crucial.com Dell usually charges and arm and a leg for RAM. Daniel (Tracy) wrote in message . com... I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system. I am trying to choose between these three options... (1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram (2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram (3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and 2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase. On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon, the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about the same. Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram. Please let me know what option you would go with, especially considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with this system. -Tracy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodbye Dell, Hello IBM or Toshiba? | Giganews | Dell Computers | 56 | October 4th 05 12:29 PM |
Thoughts on Dell 8400 | BCC | Ati Videocards | 6 | August 21st 04 01:14 PM |
Our Dell experience said never again | Rey Barry | Dell Computers | 50 | February 28th 04 10:44 PM |
Is Dell P1110 21" monitor the same as Liyama S102GT 21" monitor? | private person | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 25th 04 04:56 PM |
Dell customer support | Steve | Dell Computers | 30 | July 13th 03 02:39 AM |