A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » System Manufacturers & Vendors » Dell Computers
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dell 8400: Processor Vs. Ram



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 04, 10:46 PM
Tracy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dell 8400: Processor Vs. Ram

I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the
final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user
and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system.

I am trying to choose between these three options...

(1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram

I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth
it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any
frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and
2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I
wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase.

On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed
would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon,
the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about
the same.

Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the
basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram.

Please let me know what option you would go with, especially
considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with
this system.

-Tracy
  #2  
Old July 23rd 04, 11:25 PM
Tom Scales
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use a Dimension 2400 with a P4-2.8 and 640MB ram to do video
editing/rendering.

Works flawlessly without dropping a frame.

1GB is plenty.
3.0 to 3.4 is small and you won't notice it --- much.

Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so
you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way.

2GB is wasted.

Tom
"Tracy" wrote in message
om...
I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the
final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user
and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system.

I am trying to choose between these three options...

(1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram

I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth
it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any
frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and
2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I
wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase.

On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed
would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon,
the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about
the same.

Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the
basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram.

Please let me know what option you would go with, especially
considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with
this system.

-Tracy



  #3  
Old July 24th 04, 04:32 AM
Tracy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so
you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way.


I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance
worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives?

-Tracy
  #4  
Old July 24th 04, 01:03 PM
Tom Scales
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Not to me. A decent 7200rpm drive is enough.

Tom
"Tracy" wrote in message
om...
Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two,

so
you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way.


I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance
worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives?

-Tracy



  #6  
Old July 25th 04, 12:31 AM
WSZsr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

better check again. Memory for the 8400 at the time of purchase is
competitively priced. Much less expensive than Crucial.

"daniel" wrote in message
om...
Whichever amount of RAM you decide to go with, I'd compare the cost of
buying it from Dell and the cost of buying it from
www.crucial.com
Dell usually charges and arm and a leg for RAM.

Daniel

(Tracy) wrote in message

. com...
I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the
final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user
and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system.

I am trying to choose between these three options...

(1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram

I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth
it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any
frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and
2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I
wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase.

On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed
would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon,
the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about
the same.

Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the
basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram.

Please let me know what option you would go with, especially
considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with
this system.

-Tracy



  #7  
Old July 25th 04, 03:13 AM
S.Lewis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tracy" wrote in message
om...
Don't forget the hard drive. Absolutely critical. Better to have two, so
you can have a source and a destination. Much faster that way.


I'm thinking about getting a RAID 0. Is the additional performance
worth the "double risk" of loosing both drives?

-Tracy



No. Absolutely not.


  #8  
Old July 27th 04, 07:43 PM
DKH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use Pinnacle Studio Pro 9.0 and encode video from a DV camcorder using the
following:

8300 2.6 P4
1.5 gigabytes of ram
2 - 250 gig IDE drive
XP Pro

Haven't lost a frame...

Dave

"WSZsr" wrote in message
m...
better check again. Memory for the 8400 at the time of purchase is
competitively priced. Much less expensive than Crucial.

"daniel" wrote in message
om...
Whichever amount of RAM you decide to go with, I'd compare the cost of
buying it from Dell and the cost of buying it from
www.crucial.com
Dell usually charges and arm and a leg for RAM.

Daniel

(Tracy) wrote in message

. com...
I plan on purchasing a Dell 8400 later today. I'm trying to make the
final decision between these options. I consider myself a power user
and plan on doing some video editing/DVD burning with this system.

I am trying to choose between these three options...

(1) 3.0 processor / 2 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(2) 3.4 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram
(3) 3.0 processor / 1 gig of 400 mhz Ram

I'm trying to decide if the jump from 1 gig to 2 gig of Ram is worth
it. Since I'll be doing video editing/burning I don't want to drop any
frames in processing. Some argue that the difference between 1 gig and
2 gig of Ram you will never notice. That's hard for me to believe so I
wanted to get some opinions before I made my purchase.

On the other hand, I don't know if the extra .4 in processor speed
would be more noticeable than the extra Ram. With the 20% off coupon,
the price difference between 2 gig of Ram and a 3.4 processor is about
the same.

Or I could just save a few dollars in the process and go with the
basic 3.0 process and 1 gig of Ram.

Please let me know what option you would go with, especially
considering I'm a power user and plan to do a lot of DVD burning with
this system.

-Tracy





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goodbye Dell, Hello IBM or Toshiba? Giganews Dell Computers 56 October 4th 05 12:29 PM
Thoughts on Dell 8400 BCC Ati Videocards 6 August 21st 04 01:14 PM
Our Dell experience said never again Rey Barry Dell Computers 50 February 28th 04 10:44 PM
Is Dell P1110 21" monitor the same as Liyama S102GT 21" monitor? private person Homebuilt PC's 0 February 25th 04 04:56 PM
Dell customer support Steve Dell Computers 30 July 13th 03 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.