Why all big PC tech Magazine Publish in England?

On Mar 1, 4:36*am, John Doe wrote:
Red Cloud mmdir2005 yahoo.com wrote:









Rob noone nowhere.noway.con wrote:
Red Cloud wrote:
John Doejdoe usenetlove.invalid ÿwrote:
Sounds like a personal problem, Red Clown.

ÿ Is English Anglo-Saxon can't produce DDR, HDTV or any
storage devic
e
is my problem??? Haahhaha.. I guess these English white
became devolved. Why all the high-tech DDR memory are
produced by Koreans? Where is the glory of the superior
English Anglo-Saxon race. They taught ÿme the superiority of
the Anglo-Saxon is superior. I can't understand how in the
world White Anglo-Saxon ÿso downgraded they have to rely on
Asian technology.

Racism is illegal in the West. ÿYou would be thrown in jail for
your racist comments.

Happy white guy is holding a latest Samsung IPod. *His life is
totally relying on Asian hi-tech consumer device. *Is White race
became so ****ing lazy they can not even produce
flashlight?????? * Simply flashlight Western white race can't
produce. *Forget the Samsung hi-tech DDR memory making. *They
can't even manufacture simple flashlight!!!!! LAZY WHITE
RACE!!!!

You are a nasty little racist, Red Clown, and the manufacturing
problem here in our United States is more complex than your tiny
little brain can understand.

Long ago, labor unions pulled our workers into the middle class.
Then women's "rights" came along. The ruling class figured out how
to use so-called women's rights to subjugate ordinary people.
Women's "rights" has nothing to do with helping ordinary women.
It's classic "divide and conquer". The ruling class is using sex
warfare to win the class warfare. The idea that ordinary women can
somehow surpassed their male counterparts is silly. However, it
does mess up our underclass. And that helps the ruling class stay
on top. Women's rights doesn't help women in the long run, but it
allows them to earn more money. That gives them power. One way to
use that power is to corrupt our Christian church. Another way is
to help the ruling class trash labor. Most manufacturing jobs are
done by men. Women do not mind using Communist Chinese slave labor
even though it puts their male counterparts out of work. Big
business loves Communist Chinese slave labor too, to reduce
manufacturing costs. And since ordinary women have the right to
vote, men are sandwiched between the ruling class and ordinary
women, there really isn't anything (short of violent revolution)
that ordinary men can do to help correct the situation. The only
hope is for ordinary women to realize that they are being used.
But that will mean lots of sacrifice on their part. I think they
will opt for World War III instead (hopefully not any time soon).
And that means lots of toxic gaseous red clouds just like you, Red
Clown.

That's also a reason for our infrastructure to crumble. The ruling
class cannot figure out how to give infrastructure jobs to women.

--


Great post.

I think that if you have an hour to spare on you Tube you would
probably like to hear Alfred Adask on the subject who has similar
views on the subject of fake feminism, and why it is being done.
You would probably find it very interesting.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...l728l3.2.1l6l0

The one I heard was "Alfred Adask rant - The American Woman " (4 part)
but there are others there that I havent yet heard
but might be interesting.



You might also want to hear at his commentary on "man and other
animals" which explains why religion is being dismantled too,
basically to remove our status as "made in the image of god" and to
make us "animals" in law so as we have no constitutional or human
rights.

There are many speeches on this subject by him, you need several to
get the entire picture.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FH-88-gULs



See also Google Groups







Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.go ogle.com!i6g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Red Cloud mmdir2005 yahoo.com
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: Why all big PC tech Magazine Publish in England?
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Organization:http://groups.google.com
Lines: 29
Message-ID: df103a25-6ca8-456e-9410-0f190f897e5b i6g2000yqe.googlegroups.com
References: 9ab6e4a9-e8d7-4766-9627-ad78b1cad665 r20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com fd0dk7poprub1fj45j8ese3anqr55465ni 4ax.com 2466af27-1682-40f3-899b-657393c70391 r20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com jiaajf$b7k$1 dont-email.me b0b85b75-ac76-4ccb-89f4-be34a0abfbcf b3g2000yqi.googlegroups.com 4f492d09$0$1690$c3e8da3$50776f34 news.astraweb.com 870bc770-b22b-468c-94e0-d27f95e0d2e2 a15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com 4f49648e$0$64042$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af news.astraweb.com 80e6cfb1-8a75-4b83-a171-8830227f132c k29g2000yqc.googlegroups.com 9r3v5iFldqU1 mid.individual.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.60.207.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1330537982 2488 127.0.0.1 (29 Feb 2012 17:53:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
Injection-Info: i6g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.60.207.10; posting-account=J56LSgkAAADXgXF-d8W7le6CF3ZN1DW1
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010031422 Firefox/3.0.19,gzip(gfe)

On Mar 1, 3:53*am, Red Cloud wrote:
On Feb 28, 4:21*am, Rob wrote:









On 28/02/2012 08:54, Red Cloud wrote:

On Feb 25, 2:45 pm, John *wrote:
Sounds like a personal problem, Red Clown.

* Is English Anglo-Saxon can't produce DDR, HDTV or any storage device
is
my problem??? Haahhaha.. I guess these English white became devolved.
Why all the high-tech DDR memory are produced by Koreans?
Where is the glory of the superior English Anglo-Saxon race.
They taught *me the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon is superior.
I can't understand how in the world White Anglo-Saxon *so downgraded
they have to rely on Asian technology.

Racism is illegal in the West. *You would be thrown in jail for
your racist comments.

Happy white guy is holding a latest Samsung IPod. *His life is totally
relying
on Asian hi-tech consumer device. *Is White race became so ****ing
lazy they can not even produce flashlight?????? * Simply flashlight
Western white race
can't produce. *Forget the Samsung hi-tech DDR memory making. *They
can't even manufacture simple flashlight!!!!! LAZY WHITE RACE!!!!


Speaking from the Australian point of view, you simply wouldn't be
able to do it here.
Unless you produced some specialised, customised flashlight (or other
item) made to spec for
someone (government) to who cost was no object you would be bankrupt
in the first year


Once you cut through all the laws that are against business,
Unnecessary environmental crap, massive local
council rates charges, $3000 PA for a home, and about $15,000 a year
for a small retail premises
and now with the Carbon tax, forget affordable electricity
(currently 23c KWH, but will go up 10-20% more with the carbon tax))

Union and skilled labour problems, and even if you could find people
who would work, you have to compete
with the welfare state, where as soon as you get to the age where you
can conceive you receive around
$1400 per week tax free once you slut out 4 children, as well as free
legal, free medical and hospital,
(you get free dental, but would wait for probably 5+ years to get an
appointment) and human rights that the
middle class can only dream of, but instead they have to pay for this
human bogan rubbish to live in luxury.

Even unemployment benefit is not bad, and if you make sure you do
something to remain unemployable
(ie - commit a crime and get a record) you can stay on this for life.


The whole idea is to get people fully dependant on government in order
to be fully under control of the
government.


The other problem is the 'unfair dismissal laws" that make even the
most useless lazy worker extremely
difficult to fire, even if they blatantly do wrong. In one case a
worker caught stealing from the cash register
of a major supermarket chain, successfully sued them for damages and
their job back, for the simple reason
that they were not told that they were not to steal.

KR wrote:

Speaking from the Australian point of view

Speaking from the United States point of view

Once you cut through all the laws that are against business,

Big business is part of the ruling class here.

Unnecessary environmental crap,

Unfortunately, some environmental law is necessary. Some
businesses are good, some businesses are bad. Without
environmental law, you are favoring the bad business by allowing
it to dump sewage into a waterway. The good guy either takes the
same shortcut or goes out of business. Or maybe you think that
people upstream for me should be able to pollute the water that I
drink.

Are you a Libertarian?

Union and skilled labour problems, and even if you could find
people who would work,

If you really think that businessmen are better than ordinary men,
I think you have a personal problem. That is not uncommon, though.
Thinking that the rich are virtuous goes back to at least biblical
times.

you have to compete with the welfare state,

If the ruling class stopped using ordinary women to divide and
conquer ordinary people, the welfare state would be much smaller.

where as soon as you get to the age where you can conceive you
receive around $1400 per week tax free once you slut out 4
children, as well as free legal, free medical and hospital,

That helps break up ordinary families, to help foster the same
dependence in the next generation. The ruling class have a lot to
do with it.

What is your stand on women's "rights"?

(you get free dental, but would wait for probably 5+ years to
get an appointment) and human rights that the middle class can
only dream of, but instead they have to pay for this human bogan
rubbish to live in luxury.

....and other fairy tales.

Even unemployment benefit is not bad, and if you make sure you
do something to remain unemployable (ie - commit a crime and get
a record) you can stay on this for life.

You exaggerate too much.

The whole idea is to get people fully dependant on government in
order to be fully under control of the government.

If you believe that the ruling class rich including those in big
business have nothing to do with government, you are gullible.

The other problem is the 'unfair dismissal laws" that make even
the most useless lazy worker extremely difficult to fire, even
if they blatantly do wrong. In one case a worker caught
stealing from the cash register of a major supermarket chain,
successfully sued them for damages and their job back, for the
simple reason that they were not told that they were not to
steal.

Don't believe everything you hear.

On Feb 28, 10:21*pm, Rob wrote:
On 28/02/2012 08:54, Red Cloud wrote:

On Feb 25, 2:45 pm, John *wrote:
Sounds like a personal problem, Red Clown.

* Is English Anglo-Saxon can't produce DDR, HDTV or any storage device
is
my problem??? Haahhaha.. I guess these English white became devolved.
Why all the high-tech DDR memory are produced by Koreans?
Where is the glory of the superior English Anglo-Saxon race.
They taught *me the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon is superior.
I can't understand how in the world White Anglo-Saxon *so downgraded
they have to rely on Asian technology.

Racism is illegal in the West. *You would be thrown in jail for
your racist comments.

Shows another example of the lack of freedom of speech in the west.
If its like here, the "racism" is "selective" too.

On Mar 4, 3:20*pm, John Doe wrote:
KR wrote:
Speaking from the Australian point of view

Speaking from the United States point of view

Once you cut through all the laws that are against business,

Big business is part of the ruling class here.


Thats true from what I can gather. Its actually Fascism, which
by definition is the "merger of corporation and state".


Unnecessary environmental crap,

Unfortunately, some environmental law is necessary. Some
businesses are good, some businesses are bad. Without
environmental law, you are favoring the bad business by allowing
it to dump sewage into a waterway. The good guy either takes the
same shortcut or goes out of business. Or maybe you think that
people upstream for me should be able to pollute the water that I
drink.


Some of it is, but the majority is irrelevant to the environment, and
is just used as a mechanism to tax to death and close small business
and firms
to help the big guys get more market share.

If you have lived in or near an area where industry was closed, you
will
find that the dispossessed people that are left behind, soon turn
feral
and apart from costing you heaps in tax to keep them on benefits, not
to mention the huge extra
cost of medical, extra police and so on, the way these people
ultimately end up living
the pollution and harm caused to society is probably not much worse
than the industries were.

You cannot manufacture any given item without some pollution.



Are you a Libertarian?


Define what that is in the USA. This can be taken in many ways

If it has anything to do with enforcing the US' traditional
constitutional rights
which in the last couple of years are becoming quite popular and of
interest here,
then would have to say yes.



Union and skilled labour problems, and even if you could find
people who would work,

If you really think that businessmen are better than ordinary men,
I think you have a personal problem. That is not uncommon, though.
Thinking that the rich are virtuous goes back to at least biblical
times.



I don't think the rich are somehow virtuous, and in fact, when you
look at it
its people in expensive suits, sitting on thrones, (and those in
government who
the above group control) they are the major cause of the world's
problems.



The traditional way here was to work hard and to the best of your
skill and ability to be comfortable
(middle class), and then take it easy once you had a nice house, nice
car, family, get their kids educated for
what they wanted to do in life, or started in a trade, and have
sufficient funds
to live comfortably into retirement.... And not be a burden on anyone
else, whether it be society or family.

Usually once they reached these goals in middle age these people would
then cut back on their work or desire
for earning money at that point, and help others, usually by volunteer
work in local charity or community groups to help the less fortunate,
and/or helping train or start others in that trade or profession that
they had worked in. Usually these things were done without
telling all the world about it.


This is getting less now, as it seems to be necessary to have both man
and woman working, to come anywhere near the standard
of living enjoyed a generation ago from one income. What this means
is that the corporate world now gets both parents for the price
of one.



The ones that are the problem - and seem to be a modern disease are
the ones who want to
continually amass money in unlimited amounts by any means, want to
completely crush any
competition, and in the process grab as much power and influence as
possible.




you have to compete with the welfare state,

If the ruling class stopped using ordinary women to divide and
conquer ordinary people, the welfare state would be much smaller.

where as soon as you get to the age where you can conceive you
receive around $1400 per week tax free once you slut out 4
children, as well as free legal, free medical and hospital,

That helps break up ordinary families, to help foster the same
dependence in the next generation. The ruling class have a lot to
do with it.



Thats true, and since the average "pram pushing slut" (as they are
commonly
referred to here,) has 4 kids, that's 4 more ALP voters that are there
to help
vote money out of the middle class's pocket, and get a small portion
of it in benefits.



What is your stand on women's "rights"?

They (as they are promoted and selectively enforced here)
are a crock of ****, and have done enormous damage to
society, as well as the family and women themselves.


(you get free dental, but would wait for probably 5+ years to
get an appointment) and human rights that the middle class can
only dream of, but instead they have to pay for this human bogan
rubbish to live in luxury.

...and other fairy tales.


These are well known fact to anyone who lives here. 4 kids, you get a
big
house - and big rent subsidy, usually 4 bed premium property.

The dental waiting situation has been covered widely in mainstream
media since about 2002.
A guy who worked for me who had government health care has been
waiting since 2004 and
now his teeth are ****ed. It would be $2000+ to go to private care.


Even unemployment benefit is not bad, and if you make sure you
do something to remain unemployable (ie - commit a crime and get
a record) you can stay on this for life.

You exaggerate too much.


Again you don't live here and aren't familiar with the reality of this
situation.
There have been people on the dole since the 1970's when it started,
and
due to their typically low breeding age, have continued with this for
the next
2 generations.


The whole idea is to get people fully dependant on government in
order to be fully under control of the government.

If you believe that the ruling class rich including those in big
business have nothing to do with government, you are gullible.


I don't see what that has to do with welfare, and I have known for
a long time that big business and government are merged.



The other problem is the 'unfair dismissal laws" that make even
the most useless lazy worker extremely difficult to fire, even
if they blatantly do wrong. * In one case a worker caught
stealing from the cash register of a major supermarket chain,
successfully sued them for damages and their job back, for the
simple reason that they were not told that they were not to
steal.


Don't believe everything you hear.


Being in business and working with other small businesses I know from
others who have been victims of this bull****
Due to our court system, where if you are not a welfare or working
class person you have
to pay for legal defense, which is usually about $15,000 and you don't
get it back
from a feral or working class person even if you win, you are pretty
much forced to settle
rather than have your day in court, if the amount claimed is $15k or
less. Legal aid (gov) will
not pay the costs of the other party if they win.


The case about the stealing was widely covered in mainstream media at
the time.


There was another one about an idiot who was twice caught smoking in a
petroleum storage area
and was sacked on the spot the second time.. He won an unfair
dismissal,
they had to pay him compo and give him his job back.

KR kenreed1999 gmail.com wrote:

Thats true from what I can gather. Its actually Fascism, which
by definition is the "merger of corporation and state".

I don't think the rich are somehow virtuous, and in fact, when
you look at it its people in expensive suits, sitting on
thrones, (and those in government who the above group control)
they are the major cause of the world's problems.

I think this is how it works here... Democrats promote the ruling
class women's "rights" agenda. It helps keep the underclass
disorganized and oppressed. Then, when all of the costs associated
with so-called women's rights come back up to Washington,
Republicans are there to shield the ruling class from having to
pay for the side effects of their own agenda. Democrats are
outspoken, but Republicans don't say a word against women's
"rights" here in the United States.

I think some of our politicians don't like what they're doing, but
they are trapped.

The traditional way here was to work hard and to the best of
your skill and ability to be comfortable (middle class), and
then take it easy once you had a nice house, nice car, family,
get their kids educated for what they wanted to do in life, or
started in a trade, and have sufficient funds to live
comfortably into retirement.... And not be a burden on anyone
else, whether it be society or family.

Usually once they reached these goals in middle age these people
would then cut back on their work or desire for earning money at
that point, and help others, usually by volunteer work in local
charity or community groups to help the less fortunate, and/or
helping train or start others in that trade or profession that
they had worked in. Usually these things were done without
telling all the world about it.


This is getting less now, as it seems to be necessary to have
both man and woman working, to come anywhere near the standard
of living enjoyed a generation ago from one income. What this
means is that the corporate world now gets both parents for the
price of one.

Here in the United States, Richard Nixon is the president known
for normalizing relations with Communist China (our main source of
slave labor). In 1973... Row versus Wade was decided. Richard
Nixon appointed a woman to fill high-level administration
positions with women. And men's earnings have fallen since then.
No doubt there were other significant turning points, but that one
looks obvious.

I think the ruling class got wind of the idea that ordinary women
can be used against their male counterparts to subjugate ordinary
people.

The first benefit of women's rights was to bestow property rights
on them. Obviously that would be geared towards the ruling class,
since they own the most property. One thing for sure, when women
were given the right to vote, ordinary men had less idea than the
ruling class of the potential negative consequences for ordinary
people.

And now women's "rights" is promoted as a necessary part of
democracy! I think that's similar to the Nazi Germany style BIG
LIE.

The ones that are the problem - and seem to be a modern disease
are the ones who want to continually amass money in unlimited
amounts by any means, want to completely crush any competition,
and in the process grab as much power and influence as possible.

They are supported by government "so that we can compete". That's
probably just an excuse. The same thing can be done through trade
law. Trade should be based on natural resources and climate, but
not slave labor. Communist China would be **** without our market.
Leaders of democracies can band together and trade amongst
ourselves, but our leaders goal isn't to promote democracy. I
don't really know if it helps (it's certainly better than voting),
but I vote with my money. If possible, I buy products made in a
democracy. Otherwise, I try to put off the purchase. Using
Communist Chinese slave labor is one of the worst examples of
leadership in this age IMO. We need to avoid following it.

[Women's rights] (as they are promoted and selectively enforced
here) are a crock of ****, and have done enormous damage to
society, as well as the family and women themselves.

Do you know what the statistics are for men running big business
over there or elsewhere? Here, ninety-seven percent of our top
1000 companies are run by men. Up there in Richland, they practice
patriarchy. Conservative sheep who support the ruling class must
think that the ruling class are the last bastion of real men and
the virtuous keepers of family values. More likely, the ruling
class understand what matriarchy does to the underclass and that's
why they promote it without practicing it. Seriously...
Republicans pretend to be helpless against big business moving
jobs to Communist China. Obviously the ruling class rule.

Being in business and working with other small businesses

I can see that big business is favored over small business, but I
don't have that perspective. I would guess that all of the talk
about helping small business is just talk, like many other things,
regardless of which political party it comes from. I usually just
think of them as helping small business women when they talk about
helping small business.

My "ruling class" is fairly easy to define. It's those above the
"glass ceiling". The glass ceiling continues to get higher, and so
does the concentration of wealth.






--

I usually don't snip context, no offense intended, I just wanted
to keep it simple as possible. I know it's confusing, but the
reader can look at the prior post if necessary.