If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote:
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben Myers
wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
mm wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben Myers wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. How did you determine that? The first memory allocated may or may not be from any particular address space and the area most accessed may or may not be related to the address space assigned to that function? yes? no? But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:59 -0800, mike wrote:
mm wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben Myers wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. How did you determine that? I didn't determine it. "I'm 99% sure that I read it." It makes sense, to me, and a reason it makes sense would be so that it used faster memory more often that way. The first memory allocated may or may not be from any particular address space and the area most accessed may or may not be related to the address space assigned to that function? yes? no? I don't know. You end your sentence with a question mark, so I guess you're not saying one way or the other. My concentration was on whether large DIMMs should be first or not. If the answer to your question means that it doesn't matter if faster DIMMs are first, then it likely doesn't matter if large DIMMs are first. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On Dec 17, 9:52*pm, mm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:59 -0800, mike wrote: mm wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben Myers wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. How did you determine that? I didn't determine it. *"I'm 99% sure that I read it." *It makes sense, to me, and a reason it makes sense would be so that it used faster memory more often that way. The first memory allocated may or may not be from any particular address space and the area most accessed may or may not be related to the address space assigned to that function? *yes? no? I don't know. * You end your sentence with a question mark, so I guess you're not saying one way or the other. My concentration was on whether large DIMMs should be first or not. If the answer to your question means that it doesn't matter if faster DIMMs are first, then it likely doesn't matter if large DIMMs are first. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. *A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. * But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? *Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. *But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. *Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. 1st you mention "bigger" then you say "faster". WTF? You are using all the same speed, aren't you? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 05:48:29 -0800 (PST), Bob Villa
wrote: On Dec 17, 9:52*pm, mm wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:59 -0800, mike wrote: mm wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben Myers wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. How did you determine that? I didn't determine it. *"I'm 99% sure that I read it." *It makes sense, to me, and a reason it makes sense would be so that it used faster memory more often that way. The first memory allocated may or may not be from any particular address space and the area most accessed may or may not be related to the address space assigned to that function? *yes? no? I don't know. * You end your sentence with a question mark, so I guess you're not saying one way or the other. My concentration was on whether large DIMMs should be first or not. If the answer to your question means that it doesn't matter if faster DIMMs are first, then it likely doesn't matter if large DIMMs are first. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. *A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. * But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? *Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. *But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. *Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. 1st you mention "bigger" then you say "faster". WTF? I was suggesting that maybe the reason someone would think that bigger DIMMs should go first was that, iirc, faster DIMMs should go first. And that that was generalized into "better" DIMMs should go first, even though it didn't actually apply to bigger ones. You are using all the same speed, aren't you? Yes, the same speed. The same everything afaict except size. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On 12/17/2010 7:07 PM, mm wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. There is no difference whatsoever placing faster memory in the first DIMM slots or the second ones. "Faster" memory is rated to run at a faster speed than slower memory, but it can and does also run at slower speeds. The speed at which memory operates is dictated by the motherboard and CPU, not by the memory itself which is a passive component. For example, if you put PC3200 memory in a system with a CPU operating with a 533MHz front side bus (e.g. the hot-running 3.06 GHz P4), the memory operates at the lower PC2100 speed... Ben Myers |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On 12/17/2010 10:52 PM, mm wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:59 -0800, wrote: mm wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. How did you determine that? I didn't determine it. "I'm 99% sure that I read it." It makes sense, to me, and a reason it makes sense would be so that it used faster memory more often that way. The first memory allocated may or may not be from any particular address space and the area most accessed may or may not be related to the address space assigned to that function? yes? no? I don't know. You end your sentence with a question mark, so I guess you're not saying one way or the other. My concentration was on whether large DIMMs should be first or not. If the answer to your question means that it doesn't matter if faster DIMMs are first, then it likely doesn't matter if large DIMMs are first. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. It doesn't matter if faster DIMMs are first. See my other response. It MAY matter if large DIMMs are first. Again, a read of the owner's manual or the chipset spec will tell if it does matter... Ben Myers |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second?
On Dec 19, 10:50*am, Ben Myers wrote:
On 12/17/2010 7:07 PM, mm wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:17:24 -0500, Ben wrote: On 12/15/2010 9:52 PM, mm wrote: Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? Posted to alt.comp.hardware and alt.sys.pc-clone.dell, since the computer is a Dell and I started the topic in that group, but have broader questions now. I have two 512M and two 1G DDR[1]s and they are the same speed PC2700, the same 333, the same CL 2.5, the same non-ECC and assume everything else the same except the brand and size. Does it make a difference if the big pair goes in the first pair of slots, or if the small pair does??? Is this true for DDR2 and DDR3 also? Just to be perfectly clear, if you are talking about Dell Precision 360, Dimension 4600, Optiplex GX270, or Dimension 8300, It was meant as a general question. I'm 99% sure I've read that *faster* memory should go in the first pair of slots, and that makes sense so that one should use the faster memory most of the time. But here the speed is the same, only the *size* is different, so does it matter which one is first? two memory slots have black DIMM clips and two have white clips. *A matched pair has to go in a pair of DIMM slots with the same color of clips. Yes, thanks, the computer I'm working on now is a Dell 4600 and the manual made that clear. As a rule, I install the larger capacity memory in the "first" pair of slots. But is that a personal practice, or maybe a habit left over from fast vs. slow memory, or is it really based on some benchmark testing or recommended by engineers or so forth? Which is the "first" pair of slots? *Usually the one nearest to the CPU and its mate with the same color of clips. *But when in doubt, read the owner's manual. *Same for DDR2 and DDR3. These boards all have Intel 865 or 875 chipsets, which dictate the memory configuration rules. Way back when I worked in mainframe software development, we and tech support used to write "RTFB" responses, telling customers the answers to their questions or solutions to their problems and telling them to read the ^^&&*(_* book, where the answer could be found... Ben Myers The Dell owners manual didn't go into such detail. Thanks again. There is no difference whatsoever placing faster memory in the first DIMM slots or the second ones. *"Faster" memory is rated to run at a faster speed than slower memory, but it can and does also run at slower speeds. The speed at which memory operates is dictated by the motherboard and CPU, not by the memory itself which is a passive component. *For example, if you put PC3200 memory in a system with a CPU operating with a 533MHz front side bus (e.g. the hot-running 3.06 GHz P4), the memory operates at the lower PC2100 speed... Ben Myers Ben, wouldn't that lower speed instance be PC2700? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Memory: Does it matter if big DDRs are firsr or second? | mm | Dell Computers | 13 | December 20th 10 03:48 AM |
does memory brand really matter? | Nate Nagel | General | 11 | September 7th 08 07:12 PM |
How much does memory speed matter? | Cyde Weys | General | 6 | August 1st 06 02:00 PM |
Does memory bank order matter? | Sabyasachi Basu | General | 0 | August 18th 03 09:49 AM |
Number of memory modules matter? | Mickey Mouse | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | August 7th 03 06:16 AM |