Is it wrong

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:28:10 +0000, Gazwad wrote:

Punching people in the face who wear glasses is generally a no-no, right?
But these ****s who wear those stupid ****ing rectangular glasses, they're
just asking to be punched in their stupid ****ing faces, aren't they?

Yup.

In your case, just the stupid ****ing face is a sufficient condition.

HTH

Ad hoc , the bald-headed leper and dirty-minded
faggot-worker who likes ravenous knob-slobbing with beavers, and whose
partner is a camp follower with a denuded cockpit, wrote in
:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:28:10 +0000, Gazwad wrote:

Punching people in the face who wear glasses is generally a no-no,
right? But these ****s who wear those stupid ****ing rectangular
glasses, they're just asking to be punched in their stupid ****ing
faces, aren't they?

Yup.

In your case, just the stupid ****ing face is a sufficient condition.

HTH

Yes, thanks for the invite. When would you like to receive your punch in the
face?



--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.