If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Sandisk Thumbnailscrew
OK, one may presume, for embed or dedicated applications.
Applications you can reach around and stick your hand into for, say, a fanny-packed handheld device;- I haven't one, actually, to speak of, but rather a simplistically engineered, psycho acoustically-chipped, shirt-pocket radio. Midnight Cowboy at the drugstore corner stuff for the twenty-first century digital revolution: You need to know what the hell you're doing to play. https://hyperstone.com/en/A1-Compact...oller-216.html Behold woe, though, should you even remotely expect Sandisk's SD TF Flash Memory, MicroSDHC class cards, its controller, specifically, to be so forgiving if placed even remotely near a PC environment proper. They'll break like hell;- Hell, literally, means what Sandisk is about when you'll seek resolution from their warranty qualifications. Yes, that means they even want photo JPG images to qualify considering 10-year or lifetime warranty card stipends. To visit the Sandisk hell is easily accomplished. I suggest buying anything above 16GB in their Class4(-10) SDHC offerings. Question: How, too, can I get to see Sandisk's hell. 1) First you want to spend your money in order to do so. 2) Then you'll need a USB adaptor to format it, on your Personal Computer, thereby rendering it qualifiedly* useless and irrevocably* broken. Please to note: Sandisk as well provides their own format utility, which equally will run, upon their products, to render them no better than as useless as from a PC-formatted environ. * It is strongly upheld, that you visit Sandisk's friendly automated Warrantee Consideration Department for further, in-depth perspectives. Best take it straight from the horse's mouth: An aftermarket industry for compact memory is rife with relatively easily hacked controllers on compact cards reporting larger memory capacities, than, in actuality, a smaller quantity of physical memory rewriting over itself, over potentially established data prematurely, in order to achieve that degree of exploitation. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A Sandisk Thumbnailscrew
On 3/12/2016 8:06 PM, Flasherly wrote:
OK, one may presume, for embed or dedicated applications. Just buy another copy. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A Sandisk Thumbnailscrew
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:19:18 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: Just buy another copy. First I bought a 16G MicroSDHC - a Sandisk. Then I bought a 32G offbrand: Welcome to after-market, hacked and fake controllers. (Cards which begin to rewrite themselves, over established data, prior to the card's stated capacity.) So I went back to Sandisk. AKA, still a 32G "4K card" or FAT32. (Larger, 64G cards, use FAT extended, FATExt.) I also downloaded Sandisk's website utility for formatting their cards. I killed every one of the above cards. They're useless now. I'll send you them for filler for the bottom of your favorite trash can. The 16G card still works perfectly. I did not manage to kill that one by reformatting, initiating the disk it with either Easus, AOMEI, or Windows' native Disk Manage. The 16G was also my initial impression, a favorable and normal one, for this class of memory storage. Now qualifiedly with a touch of fear. These cards are for handheld devices, e.g. Google's latest Candy-Coated Android for a handheld, camera medium, in other words something not quite ready for Prime Time, such as an actual Personal Computer. My latest Singapore wonder, a $10 MP3 chipped radio uses MicroSDHC. The engineer only speaks Chinglish and hangs on Amazon. Bad choice, implementing MicroSDHC, when he's recommending specific brand names he's only tested (across a field rife with fakery & hacking, with even known brand names operationally inconclusive). I also wrote a few comments, fairly neutral for based on the logistics of laying in MicroSDHC file formats, according to the logic of how the perceives to order a play list. Perhaps he mentioned what I wrote, in his own particular explinations, after deleting my post for an unrelated technicality. In any event, I've ordered another one of his products (in another variation, this time, though, encompassing both USB and MicroSDHC). I can presume that when the item arrives I will be able to correct for the engineer's shortcomings for implementing MicroSDHC in a situation where a real computer is needed to handle a better class of storage solution. That's the plan. Delivery is slated for later today. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A Sandisk Thumbnailscrew
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 12:03:21 -0500, Flasherly
wrote: Delivery is slated for later today. Got it. Nice and shiny, shiny unit in a Candy Apple Red. Picked up my USB 64G flashstick fine. Sequenced buffering of file copies evidently conflicts with NAND controllers, as well and similarly as it does to MicroSDHC thumb cards. This in turn causes the MP3 unit to misidentify direct keypad input to music tracks.* Now, if I can format a USB flashdrive, then I needn't follow your suggestion and throw away mo' money into the micro-card flash industry, or any other industry, we may hope, not up to prime time. Besides, with that 16G MicroSDHC I'd laid about 2000 song tracks;- with the 64G USB thumbdrive I should have 8000 song tracks available from a unit, no bigger than deck of cards, that fits in my shirt pocket. *Basically, it plays by the sector/cluster format, sequentially, e.g. song1 being located on HDD device sector1, and song9999 on HDD sector9999. That means patience every time 8000 songs are copied to a computer HDD, modified with additions and so forth, whereupon to copy back in a final format to the thumbdrive's controller (at odds from that manipulation): A special HDD optimizer progam is required, which I have (it's commericial), that is then capable of ordering file [re]placement according to the logical ordering of a thumbdrive's format, by ascending numbered clusters corresponding to ascending numbered file names. Got it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A Sandisk Thumbnailscrew
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 20:48:45 -0500, Flasherly
wrote: thumbdrive's controller (at odds from that manipulation): That may likely be interpreted for a thumbdrive controller's hardwired "wear leveling" implementation;- The file copy buffer I'm sending it certainly is not out of sequence. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions of SanDisk's U3 System? | MF[_2_] | General | 0 | August 28th 09 08:04 PM |
SanDisk Sansa review | Bret Miller | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | October 13th 06 12:23 AM |
Problem with sandisk MP3 player | Zed Rafi | General | 7 | September 2nd 05 12:55 AM |
SanDisk ImageMate SDDR-05 | STuMPy | General Hardware | 0 | December 7th 03 07:21 PM |
Sandisk ImageMate 8-in-1 Readers | J.Clarke | Storage (alternative) | 7 | November 30th 03 04:02 PM |