If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
Hi:
Below is an example of "parallel Hz" http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. The benefit of using a billion 1 Hz clock signals to make a clock rate of 1Ghz is that such a system would not get as hot as system running one 1 GHz clock signal . While the overall amount of heat generated by both systems maybe around the same, the system running a billion 1 Hz clock signals will have less heat per area than the system running one 1 billion Hz clock signal. Hence, the former system is far less vulnerable to thermal damage than the latter. Let's say two CPUs of different frequencies have been running at the same voltages and amperages and for the same amount of time. The CPU with a higher-frequency will be hotter than the CPU with a lower- frequency. In a "parallel Hz" device the bits maybe completely in serial and the algorithms and tasks maybe totally non-parallelizable. However, the frequency is still parallel. The device I am proposing is completely serial except for the clock rate. My proposed device is completely serial except for the frequency. It uses "parallel Hz" but in terms of everything other than frequency, it is totally serial and non-parallel. Only the clock rate is parallel. Parallel Hz = a method using N number of 1 Hz clock signals to gain a clock rate of N Hz. My design has a clock rate of 4 GHz that is obtained by using 4 billion 1 Hz clock signals. But otherwise, it is completely serial. This design would go great for any application that cannot be efficiently parallelized [in terms of bits]. Examples of such are arithmetics and Boolean logic. Parallel Hz would work for serial-only problems because the bits are still in serial. Parallel Hz does not require that the bits be parallel. There is a significant difference between "parallel Hz" and "parallel bits". A parallel printer is an example of a device that uses "parallel bits". This has nothing to do with "parallel Hz" because both serial and parallel devices can use parallel Hz. Thanks, Radium |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Troll season is already into re-runs.
Radium wrote:
Hi: Bye: -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
Radium wrote:
Hi: Below is an example of "parallel Hz" http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. The benefit of using a billion 1 Hz clock signals to make a clock rate of 1Ghz is that such a system would not get as hot as system running one 1 GHz clock signal . While the overall amount of heat generated by both systems maybe around the same, the system running a billion 1 Hz clock signals will have less heat per area than the system running one 1 billion Hz clock signal. Hence, the former system is far less vulnerable to thermal damage than the latter. Let's say two CPUs of different frequencies have been running at the same voltages and amperages and for the same amount of time. The CPU with a higher-frequency will be hotter than the CPU with a lower- frequency. In a "parallel Hz" device the bits maybe completely in serial and the algorithms and tasks maybe totally non-parallelizable. However, the frequency is still parallel. The device I am proposing is completely serial except for the clock rate. My proposed device is completely serial except for the frequency. It uses "parallel Hz" but in terms of everything other than frequency, it is totally serial and non-parallel. Only the clock rate is parallel. Parallel Hz = a method using N number of 1 Hz clock signals to gain a clock rate of N Hz. My design has a clock rate of 4 GHz that is obtained by using 4 billion 1 Hz clock signals. But otherwise, it is completely serial. This design would go great for any application that cannot be efficiently parallelized [in terms of bits]. Examples of such are arithmetics and Boolean logic. Parallel Hz would work for serial-only problems because the bits are still in serial. Parallel Hz does not require that the bits be parallel. There is a significant difference between "parallel Hz" and "parallel bits". A parallel printer is an example of a device that uses "parallel bits". This has nothing to do with "parallel Hz" because both serial and parallel devices can use parallel Hz. Thanks, Radium Ya gots your persumptions ronggg. If each processor drew a microwatt, a billion would draw (and dissipate) a kilowatt. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
On May 2, 4:46 pm, Radium wrote:
Hi: Below is an example of "parallel Hz" http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. The benefit of using a billion 1 Hz clock signals to make a clock rate of 1Ghz is that such a system would not get as hot as system running one 1 GHz clock signal . While the overall amount of heat generated by both systems maybe around the same, the system running a billion 1 Hz clock signals will have less heat per area than the system running one 1 billion Hz clock signal. Hence, the former system is far less vulnerable to thermal damage than the latter. Let's say two CPUs of different frequencies have been running at the same voltages and amperages and for the same amount of time. The CPU with a higher-frequency will be hotter than the CPU with a lower- frequency. In a "parallel Hz" device the bits maybe completely in serial and the algorithms and tasks maybe totally non-parallelizable. However, the frequency is still parallel. The device I am proposing is completely serial except for the clock rate. My proposed device is completely serial except for the frequency. It uses "parallel Hz" but in terms of everything other than frequency, it is totally serial and non-parallel. Only the clock rate is parallel. Parallel Hz = a method using N number of 1 Hz clock signals to gain a clock rate of N Hz. My design has a clock rate of 4 GHz that is obtained by using 4 billion 1 Hz clock signals. But otherwise, it is completely serial. This design would go great for any application that cannot be efficiently parallelized [in terms of bits]. Examples of such are arithmetics and Boolean logic. Parallel Hz would work for serial-only problems because the bits are still in serial. Parallel Hz does not require that the bits be parallel. There is a significant difference between "parallel Hz" and "parallel bits". A parallel printer is an example of a device that uses "parallel bits". This has nothing to do with "parallel Hz" because both serial and parallel devices can use parallel Hz. Thanks, Radium That's hilarious. Dave. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
Robert Baer wrote: Radium wrote: Hi: Below is an example of "parallel Hz" http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. Hey idiot. You already asked this one before. It's as stupid as all your other ideas. Graham |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
On Wed, 02 May 2007 07:46:36 +0100, Radium wrote:
If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. I note that actually producing a compiler that can exploit an ILP of 10**9 is left as an exercise for the reader. That would be a 51 on the Knuth scale of difficulty, no? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
My design has a clock rate of 4 GHz that is obtained by using 4
billion 1 Hz clock signals. But otherwise, it is completely serial. Very Big LOL Let me guess, you are mentifex in disguise. http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/ http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/The...y/Mentifex_FAQ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
Radium wrote:
: Hi: : : Below is an example of "parallel Hz" : snip rant "Sir, there is a multi-legged creature crawling on your shoulder." [Spock, c.1967] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
"Radium" wrote in message
ups.com... Hi: Below is an example of "parallel Hz" http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/242...example8is.gif If each clock signal is 1 Hz, and you have a billion of them, staggered such that every 1ns part of the CPU can start, and finish, an instruction - making the effective 'clock rate' 1 GHz. snippity Thanks, Radium LMAO!!!!!!!!!! And just how are you going to make a CPU with a billion separate clock lines going into it, not to mention all the supporting inter-CPU communication circuits? All those CPU "parts" need to be managed somehow... the microcode to do that would require gigabytes of memory on the CPU. Heat would be the least of your worries. The OP needs to redirect his/her energy to earthbound reality and stop watching so many StarTrek reruns. -- Dave M MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the address) Life is like a roll of toilet paper; the closer to the end, the faster it goes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Advantages of Parallel Hz
On May 2, 3:27 am, insert name wrote:
Very Big LOL Let me guess, you are mentifex in disguise.http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/http://...y/Mentifex_FAQ Those mentifex devices are massively-parallel. As I said, my "parallel Hz" design is intended for applications that are serial. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parallel to USB: HP Bi-Tronics Parallel Interface" ? | [email protected] | Printers | 1 | January 9th 06 07:50 PM |
Any advantages? | Gary C | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | April 6th 05 01:39 AM |
Advantages of going XP64 | Black Shuck | AMD x86-64 Processors | 43 | January 26th 05 10:26 AM |
LCD Advantages? | Mike245 | General | 6 | August 22nd 04 09:00 PM |
Does parallel to usb work for usb printer to parallel port? | Don in WNY | Printers | 2 | July 14th 03 11:04 AM |